Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Just amazing
Edited By: threeven Nov 14th, 2011 at 07:46 PM
http://vimeo.com/32001208
edit: embed fail I guess, but click the link it is worth the watch imo -
pretty unreal
-
nice I can see my house
-
wow
-
this is awesome, if you dont think this is cool something is wrong with you.
-
Looks fake.
-
Wow that's really cool.
Questions for Rocket Surgeon most likely: How often to satellites crash into each other? When launching them do they just take into consideration the orbits of every single satellite in space and calculate from there? Does every country share data about launches to avoid these disasters? -
the lightning looks crazy from above
-
daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaam!
-
not too many countries have the ability to put stuff into orbit. We track space junk on our own for years now
Originally Posted by Z-Fresh
Wow that's really cool.
Questions for Rocket Surgeon most likely: How often to satellites crash into each other? When launching them do they just take into consideration the orbits of every single satellite in space and calculate from there? Does every country share data about launches to avoid these disasters? -
The soundtrack makes me want to rip my ears off.
-
Edited By: Rocket Surgeon Nov 14th, 2011 at 09:56 PMOther satellites are taken into consideration when they're planning orbits, but it's not a huge deal. You have to remember that the space (no pun) up there is HUGE. Imagine a few thousand cars circling the earth on the surface... not very congested. Now imagine that the radius of the earth gets even bigger and you've got a lot more space.Originally Posted by Z-Fresh
Wow that's really cool.
Questions for Rocket Surgeon most likely: How often to satellites crash into each other? When launching them do they just take into consideration the orbits of every single satellite in space and calculate from there? Does every country share data about launches to avoid these disasters?
However, it's not all as spread out as it seems. There are good reasons why many satellites are in the same orbit (trying to be over the same geography, for example). When these satellites become old and/or non-functional, they drift from their orbits and basically become an obstacle. There are now many obstacles up there and it is getting a bit too congested for most people's tastes. Even if the chances of a collision are incredible low, the consequences are financially and programatically disastrous. These are billion+ dollar decade long programs that can be wiped out in an instant. In 2009 two satellites collided. Following this event there was a big push for international cooperation on an ATC-like organization for space. -
Baaaaaaaaa!
Wake up you fools! That's obv faked... -
Wtf was that ball of light hauling ass across the sky?
-
So is there a plan to weed out the congestion?
Originally Posted by Rocket Surgeon
Other satellites are taken into consideration when they're planning orbits, but it's not a huge deal. You have to remember that the space (no pun) up there is HUGE. Imagine a few thousand cars circling the earth on the surface... not very congested. Now imagine that the radius of the earth gets even bigger and you've got a lot more space.
However, it's not all as spread out as it seems. There are good reasons why many satellites are in the same orbit. When these satellites become old and/or non-functional, they drift from their orbits and basically become an obstacle. There are now many obstacles up there and it is getting a bit too congested for most people's tastes. Even if the chances of a collision are incredible low, the consequences are financially and programatically disastrous. These are billion+ dollar decade long programs that can be wiped out in an instant. In 2009 two satellites collided. Following this even there was a big push for international cooperation on an ATC-like organization for space. -
Nope, not at all. There's no real way to "get them down." They naturally burn up in the atmosphere, but the problem is that with the increasing amount of objects and the increasing amount of old/non-function objects, there's bound to be another 2009-like collision some day.
Typically they are now designed to fail/get old w/ some onboard fuel left over so that in the case of an emergency engineers on the ground can maneuver the satellite away from danger.
There really needs to be more international coordination, but this is obviously a very difficult problem. -
Really incredible vid, thanks for posting
-
Cool. Thanks for the explanation Rocket! Much appreciated.
Originally Posted by Rocket Surgeon
Nope, not at all. There's no real way to "get them down." They naturally burn up in the atmosphere, but the problem is that with the increasing amount of objects and the increasing amount of old/non-function objects, there's bound to be another 2009-like collision some day.
Typically they are now designed to fail/get old w/ some onboard fuel left over so that in the case of an emergency engineers on the ground can maneuver the satellite away from danger.
There really needs to be more international coordination, but this is obviously a very difficult problem. -
RS, can you post the list you had in the repost thread? Thx in advance.
Similar Threads
- 7 Replies
-
23 Replies
People interested in photoshop (time lapse video)
Last Post: Feb 22nd, 2011, 04:30 AM -
10 Replies
Time Lapse of Giants to Jets field change
By LadyLuck84 in Off Topic
Last Post: Sep 18th, 2010, 04:02 AM - 1 Replies
-
27 Replies
Let's write the story of the Earth, one phrase at a time.
By Rocket Surgeon in Off Topic
Last Post: Nov 2nd, 2007, 09:11 PM










