Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local


  1. Hi.
  2. LOL post this when you have a candidate that can come close to beating Obama in 2012...I'll wait.

    I'm being serious and throwing all politics out...who the fuck could beat him in a national election right now? Like him or not he's a political machine who won't lose in any national election any time soon. Sorry but i'll wage any ammount of money on that.
  3. you also live in Connecticut where you are going to elect a senator who lied about his war service... soo....
  4. Ahhh yes, lets elect her. Nothing shady about that.

  5.  
    Originally Posted by BirdWings View Post

    LOL post this when you have a candidate that can come close to beating Obama in 2012...I'll wait.

    I'm being serious and throwing all politics out...who the fuck could beat him in a national election right now? Like him or not he's a political machine who won't lose in any national election any time soon. Sorry but i'll wage any ammount of money on that.

  6. hes got a point, right now that is. obama will continue to decline but will it be enough against who? sarah palin? lmao. pls no. who else? bobby jindal. maybe. i just don't see any repubs that could really take it easily with the sad state of the repub party thats motto is basically, come on we cant do any worse.
  7.  
    Originally Posted by BirdWings View Post

    Ahhh yes, lets elect her. Nothing shady about that.


    oh yea boo capitalism...

    common... seriously there isn't much thats lower than lying about being in war.
  8. I think Obama takes it in 2012. Luckily, it won't be nearly as bad with a Republican congress.

    Ladies and Gentleman, the 2016 Election winner, and 45th President of the United States of America...


    PS - I called Obama as (well, I said 2012) POTUS after his speach at the Dem convention in '04
  9. whos that?
  10. Paul Ryan.
  11.  
    Originally Posted by tekiller View Post

    whos that?

    Mr. Schuester from Glee.
    Edited By: MUPokerPlayer Jul 19th, 2010 at 06:28 AM
  12.  
    Originally Posted by MUPokerPlayer View Post

    Mr. Schuester from Glee.

    sometimes I hope for your sake that Mrs.MUPP just didn't feel like signing in to her own account.
  13. whatever may happen, i liked the quote i read about how many young people dont understand a one term president. clinton and bush got reelected, no obvious challenger to obama, well jeez, hes a shoe-in for a 2nd term. it'll be 2 decades since bush 1 ended.

    a one term president isnt some stunning proposition.
  14. One term president sort of is a shocking proposition tho...incumbent presidents are 13-4 since 1900 by my count.
  15.  
    Originally Posted by Lord Supremo View Post

    One term president sort of is a shocking proposition tho...incumbent presidents are 13-4 since 1900 by my count.

    well i appriecate that count, i didnt mean to underscore a reelection, it is and probably should be the common ground. i dont even know, i just dont like the idea that a president has to stay in office/is a political machine.

    if obama cakewalks, i think thats worse than a wartime bush, how pathetic in the end. i dont really care if he wins or not, but an easy win is an embarassment to this entire country.
  16. Paul Ryan is the man. He already said he wouldn't run in 2012, but then again Obama said he wouldn't run in 08' because he lacked experience.
     
  17. <object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.collegehumor.com/moogaloop/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1938115&fullscreen=1" width="640" height="360">

    <embed src="http://www.collegehumor.com/moogaloop/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1938115&fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" allowscriptaccess="always" width="640" height="360"></object>
  18.  
    Originally Posted by tekiller View Post

    hes got a point, right now that is. obama will continue to decline but will it be enough against who? sarah palin? lmao. pls no. who else? bobby jindal. maybe. i just don't see any repubs that could really take it easily with the sad state of the repub party thats motto is basically, come on we cant do any worse.

    please, those arguments are so painful.... where was Bill Clinton on the radar in July 1990? Someone will come out of the woodwork.... and it's really silly to even discuss Obama's chances in 2012 right now. Midterms are the issue at hand.

     
    Originally Posted by Lord Supremo View Post

    One term president sort of is a shocking proposition tho...incumbent presidents are 13-4 since 1900 by my count.

    incumbent presidents are 3-3 since 1976, by my count. Either of our numbers is pretty irrelevant, it will depend on the state of the country in 2012, not the data on one-term presidents. As is the discussion on Obama irrelevant right now.... George HW Bush had the highest approval rating of any president in history - 22 months before he was soundly defeated by Clinton.
     
  19.  
    Originally Posted by resilient View Post

    he was soundly defeated by Clinton.

    give your boy a lilllllll more credit than that, losing 43-37 when the strongest 3rd party candidacy in the modern era is jacking heaps of your votes isn't so bad.

    Agreed that discussion of 2012 based on approval ratings isn't really all that relevant at this point, Reagan's numbers were worse than Obama's at this stage in the game and I heard he did semi-OK in his re-elect.

    I do think that there are powerful advantages to being the incumbent president tho, and that smart money is on them unless things are going horrrrrrrrrrribly
  20. All depends on the economy. If it hasn't rebounded even a little bit, we get a new president. Period.
  21.  
    Originally Posted by userid363 View Post

    All depends on the economy. If it hasn't rebounded even a little bit, we get a new president. Period.

    i agree
     
  22. ^^^^
    wow
  23. Obama can win if he wants to in 2012 if the Republicans take the House and Senate this year. If not, he is gonna have a hard time, no matter what he does.

    As posters above have said, Obama's election success in 2012 will be all about what it was about in 2008...the economy. I don't see it bouncing back unless the power in Washington is balanced out. If the Democrats maintain enough control in Congress and Obama can still pass much of his agenda, the economy is gonna get wayyyy worse before it ever gets better. No shot that the current leadership has enough discipline to stop spending.

    If the Republicans take both houses this year, you are either gonna see Obama make a Clinton-like dash to the center to get re-elected, or a big fat liberal lame duck for two more years before the Republicans take over full control in 2012...which will likely start the entire shit storm all over again, unless of course we can get a REAL conservative in the WH that will shrink the government in a major way and veto any piece of crap legislation that Republicans are also prone to vote for when they are in power.
  24. ^^^ agreed
  25.  
    Originally Posted by cdmalgee View Post

    I think Obama takes it in 2012. Luckily, it won't be nearly as bad with a Republican congress.

    Ladies and Gentleman, the 2016 Election winner, and 45th President of the United States of America...
    PS - I called Obama as (well, I said 2012) POTUS after his speach at the Dem convention in '04

    Not after Jerri tells what she has to say.
  26. you're thinking of Jack Ryan the senate candidate from Illinois, MC.

    Paul Ryan is from Wisconsin, is a fiscal conservative and straight up owned Pres. Obama in the "open" forum/discussion on health care.
  27. In before a pack of OT libs led by UD come in defending their hero, Obama and his performance in the healthcare "discussion".
  28. Hillary could run against him which would help the Democrats move to the middle, rather than have Obama reinvent himself. The other nice thing for the Democrats and Independents who thought it would be cool to have a black president could be responsible for voting in a woman president too. Bill is out there endorsing non Obama candidates right now. Bill and Hillary are politicians and darn good ones, too. This might be Hillary's last and best shot to become President.
  29. for the love of science bring back hide thread
  30.  
    Originally Posted by Willywoo View Post

    Hillary could run against him which would help the Democrats move to the middle, rather than have Obama reinvent himself. The other nice thing for the Democrats and Independents who thought it would be cool to have a black president could be responsible for voting in a woman president too. Bill is out there endorsing non Obama candidates right now. Bill and Hillary are politicians and darn good ones, too. This might be Hillary's last and best shot to become President.

    Drinking so early?

Similar Threads