goddammit tiger win a major so you can shut every hater up

 

Originally Posted by TheWacoKidd

he's ranked #1 in the world.

yeah and I'm very happy for this but until he wins a big one people are still going to come back and chirp him


and by people I mean turd cunts

 

Originally Posted by TheWacoKidd

exactly. ignore them. only droolers and dolts hate on Tiger (and racists)

and Swedes

 

Originally Posted by ZeeDustin

Why? Tiger winning an event with the weakest field of the year? Or him beating 2 no names on Sunday? Lol. I guess people will always say he is back and not but until he actually wins under pressure it should be a moot point. One guy went bogey bogey par and one shot 77. And my reasoning for hate on tiger is not race or jealousy. It's because he a pos who lies about everything and a phony. Has been doing this since junior golf. Dudes a thug outside the media. He is scum. But he is the best golfer right now and has been since 2008. Will never be the greatest tho.

I just wanna say...

... ah fuck it why bother.

 

Originally Posted by TheWacoKidd

he's ranked #1 in the world.

he's just #1 in the fedex point standings, not ranked #1

 

Originally Posted by ZeeDustin

Why? Tiger winning an event with the weakest field of the year? Or him beating 2 no names on Sunday? Lol. I guess people will always say he is back and not but until he actually wins under pressure it should be a moot point. One guy went bogey bogey par and one shot 77. And my reasoning for hate on tiger is not race or jealousy. It's because he a pos who lies about everything and a phony. Has been doing this since junior golf. Dudes a thug outside the media. He is scum. But he is the best golfer right now and has been since 2008. Will never be the greatest tho.

How can you take anyone serious who thinks he isn't the greatest ever, come on now. By far the most dominant golfer of the most talented golf generation ever. Also it is pretty well known that Phil Mickelson is a much bigger phony than Tiger, as well as Arnold Palmer, so don't act like he is alone in that regard

Tiger Woods has won 27% of all PGA TOUR events he's played in. Nicklaus won 12%, Palmer 8%, Mickelson 8% & Singh 7%.

 

Originally Posted by tommpat2000

never heard that once abour arnold, and there are plenty of people who know more than you who dont think he is greastest ever (at least not yet)

Everone know Arnold was a ladies man but media brushed it under the rug. The people that think he isn't the greatest are old timers who somehow think their generation was better than today's golfers, when it is not even comparable. Oh and that stat Waco posted says it all that's amazing.

 

Originally Posted by jetman4109

he could have replaced the club on the next hole if he had a back up in the locker room. as long as you damage it during the normal course of play you can replace it.

dont think so

 

Originally Posted by TheWacoKidd

Tiger Woods has won 27% of all PGA TOUR events he's played in. Nicklaus won 12%, Palmer 8%, Mickelson 8% & Singh 7%.

Level of competition during their prime by most PGA Wins....

Of the PGA Tour Players with most wins, Tiger has played against #9, 13, 33, 42, 51, 70. Jack has played against #5, 7, 11, 14, 19, 19, 23, 25, 27, 29, 33, 33, 38, 38, 42, 48, 51, 63, 63, 70, 70, 70.

With that, Phil and possibly Ernie are the only ones who can pad their wins and they are winning at a 1-2 per year ratio and can only do that for about 5 more years max.


Also the 12% is flawed. Nicklaus playing well over 15 events a year in the mid 40's(barring miraculous Masters) and 50's where he had no chance of winning.

it really must suck to be that much of a hater. just let it go, IDK what TW has done to you persoanally, but get over it.

copy/paste fail. not even gonna bother. Go Tiger!

For the record, that was already cleared up 13 hours ago

FYI the last few years of pga tour starts/wins for jack - zee has a good point about the % based on all of those zeros but too lazy to do math for first 17 years. pretty obv it is a lot closer than 27 to 12 for %s while good. Plus tiger will never play when old to help tour like Jack did because tiger is a selfish prick.

year / starts / wins (majors)

1979 12 0 0 1 59,434 71 72.49
1980 13 2 (2) 1 0 172,386 13 70.86
1981 16 0 3 0 178,213 16 70.70
1982 15 1 3 2 232,645 12 70.90
1983 16 0 3 1 256,158 10 70.88
1984 13 1 2 1 272,595 15 70.75
1985 15 0 2 1 165,456 43 71.81
1986 15 1 (1) 0 0 226,015 34 71.56
1987 11 0 0 0 64,686 127 72.89
1988 9 0 0 0 28,845 177 72.78
1989 10 0 0 0 96,594 129 72.35
1990 9 0 0 0 68,045 160 73.71
1991 8 0 0 0 123,796 122 71.61
1992 8 0 0 0 14,868 223 72.29
1993 10 0 0 0 51,532 182 72.96
1994 8 0 0 0 11,514 248 74.79
1995 10 0 0 0 68,180 179 72.69
1996 7 0 0 0 137,779 208 73.50
1997 7 0 0 0 85,383 174 72.91
1998 5 0 0 0 128,157 172 71.10
1999 2 0 0 0 5,075 T322 73.25
2000 8 0 0 0 17,244 229 73.56
2001 4 0 0 0 0 n/a 73.08
2002 1 0 0 0 8,910 241 75.00
2003 4 0 0 0 0 n/a 75.61
2004 2 0 0 0 11,130 251 74.16
2005 3 0 0 0 0

22.6% for The Bear through the same time span while playing tougher competition as seen in the players played against with total tour wins.

Not really a good stat to look at yet. Once Tiger reaches 300 tourneys we should revisit it. He is at 271.