When Federer's forehand is on, there's just no weapon like it in the sport

 

Originally Posted by kellykip

His mom is really hot tho... not sure how anyone could have stayed hard enough to shoot a load in that

Like his mom, Andy is very pretty; real soft delicate features, they're real feminine, you know. Which is, for me...because that would be a simple sort of transition. You know what I am saying? Maybe throw a little rouge on him, tuck his sack back? Think he's game?

Andy Murray has a little streak too where he thinks he's tough...I like that in a woman

Fed looks inspired. Think he realized he probably won't have a better chance to win a major than here and he is hungry. I have always wanted to Roger to go out Sampras-style after winning a major - but if he were to win this, I wouldn't want him to retire but I have my doubts that he will win another.

lets go federer

Looks like Roger is deep into his head. Djokovic looks like he's already lost.

 

Originally Posted by Skyroller

Looks like Roger is deep into his head. Djokovic looks like he's already lost.

Ya, Djokovic is getting mindfucked really deep

 

Originally Posted by djg23

WIll be nice for Fed to add another runners up at a slam to his long list of honours

Yeah, he's had some trouble with Tsonga

I've always been a bigger Nadal fan too. Not because anything either of them did off the court, but simply because i tend to cheer for the underdog and Roger Federer was unbeatable from 2004-2007. Excluding clay, he won 11 of 12 majors in that span. That is just too fucking insane. So out of the necessity of wanting more competition I backed Nadal whenever they played. Then Nadal was clearly better and I wanted Novak to challenge him. He did, and now I hope guys like Tsonga, Del Po, and even Murray can up their games and contend for majors. As much of a treat as these past few years of tennis have been, and they have been exceptional, part of me longs for the balance of the 90s where there were a number of players that could win a given major.

 

Originally Posted by qjuice14

I've always been a bigger Nadal fan too. Not because anything either of them did off the court, but simply because i tend to cheer for the underdog and Roger Federer was unbeatable from 2004-2007. Excluding clay, he won 11 of 12 majors in that span. That is just too fucking insane. So out of the necessity of wanting more competition I backed Nadal whenever they played. Then Nadal was clearly better and I wanted Novak to challenge him. He did, and now I hope guys like Tsonga, Del Po, and even Murray can up their games and contend for majors. As much of a treat as these past few years of tennis have been, and they have been exceptional, part of me longs for the balance of the 90s where there were a number of players that could win a given major.

Ya, but at this point you gotta want Fed to win another, last major

 

Originally Posted by edwardt1988

If Murray survives his game with Tsonga, it will be a 5 set marathon. If Fed ends this quickly, he will be nice and rested and he will shit on Murray in the final

Straight sets. its a lock

 

Originally Posted by djg23

Straight sets. its a lock

How much you willing to bet on that?

When the fuck are these people in Tennis going to figure out how seeds work. 1/3 shouldn't meet until the finals and 4/5 should meet in the quarters

 

Originally Posted by edwardt1988

Ya, but at this point you gotta want Fed to win another, last major

You're right, I do. But I also grew up watching Sampras and Agassi and I don't want Federer to break Sampras' record of most weeks at #1. He has every other record and I would like the 90's era to hold on to a few records. At least Agassi still has the most consecutive wins at the Aussie Open still alive. I obviously won't be disappointed if Roger does win. He is great, possibly the greatest ever and he deserves everything he gets.

 

Originally Posted by qjuice14

You're right, I do. But I also grew up watching Sampras and Agassi and I don't want Federer to break Sampras' record of most weeks at #1. He has every other record and I would like the 90's era to hold on to a few records. At least Agassi still has the most consecutive wins at the Aussie Open still alive. I obviously won't be disappointed if Roger does win. He is great, possibly the greatest ever and he deserves everything he gets.

I definitely understand this sentiment, and again Nadal is my boy, but how fuckin badass would it be for Roger Federer in 2012 on the other side of 30 with a wife and family to storm back to #1 in the ultimate sport of youth?