[x]

Live home game ruling

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 11
  1. Archie1106 Archie1106 is offline

    Leesburg, FL
    United States

    Posts: 465
    Joined: Dec 07

    Nov 21st, 2011 (11/21/2011 4:22am)

    Was playing in a 1-3 game when this popped up.

    post flop..

    player A bets 45

    player B bets 65 and is all in

    player C wants to make it 100 and the table says no you cant raise since player B didnt complete the raise. is this correct because it didnt seem to make sense to me.
  2. Slay Slay is offline

    Posts: 2,701
    Joined: Oct 10

    Nov 21st, 2011 (11/21/2011 4:23am) in reply to Archie1106

    yep, it's called an underraise
  3. grandmamoneybags grandmamoneybags is offline

    Atlanta, GA
    United States

    Posts: 739
    Joined: Oct 09

    Nov 21st, 2011 (11/21/2011 6:35am) in reply to Slay

    Def legit
  4. doc793 doc793 is offline

    Clio, MI
    United States

    Posts: 210
    Joined: Apr 06

    Nov 21st, 2011 (11/21/2011 6:46am) in reply to grandmamoneybags

    Player C can raise since he has not taken action on the original bet. He must make it 90 or more if he has enough.

    Player A would not be allowed to raise again since the raise wasn't a full raise and he would be raising himself unless the bet was raised the full amount.
    Edited By: doc793 Nov 21st, 2011 at 06:47 AM
     
  5. Archie1106 Archie1106 is offline

    Leesburg, FL
    United States

    Posts: 465
    Joined: Dec 07

    Nov 21st, 2011 (11/21/2011 6:58am) in reply to doc793

     
    Originally Posted by doc793 View Post

    Player C can raise since he has not taken action on the original bet. He must make it 90 or more if he has enough.

    Player A would not be allowed to raise again since the raise wasn't a full raise and he would be raising himself unless the bet was raised the full amount.

    thats what i was thinking but i was way out numbered in debate and wasnt in the hand so i stfu
    Thread Starter
  6. sirjwab sirjwab is offline

    United States

    Posts: 1,631
    Joined: Oct 09

    Nov 21st, 2011 (11/21/2011 7:10am) in reply to doc793

     
    Originally Posted by doc793 View Post

    Player C can raise since he has not taken action on the original bet. He must make it 90 or more if he has enough.

    Player A would not be allowed to raise again since the raise wasn't a full raise and he would be raising himself unless the bet was raised the full amount.

    This. Player C is new to action so he can def raise. LOL at the people saying he cant.
  7. unemployable unemployable is offline

    Los Angeles, CA
    United States

    Posts: 870
    Joined: Mar 11

    Nov 21st, 2011 (11/21/2011 7:49pm) in reply to doc793

     
    Originally Posted by doc793 View Post

    Player C can raise since he has not taken action on the original bet. He must make it 90 or more if he has enough.

    Player A would not be allowed to raise again since the raise wasn't a full raise and he would be raising himself unless the bet was raised the full amount.

    Almost this but not this. Player C has yet to act so all options are open to him. If he wants to raise though he must raise the bet amount ($45) over the $65 so he has to make it at least $110. If Player C only calls then Player A can only call or fold because the action was never reopened after his bet.
  8. sirjwab sirjwab is offline

    United States

    Posts: 1,631
    Joined: Oct 09

    Nov 21st, 2011 (11/21/2011 9:16pm) in reply to unemployable

    I think you are wrong. Since 65 isnt a complete raise player C can make it 90 and just complete the raise.
    Edited By: sirjwab Nov 21st, 2011 at 09:16 PM
  9. unemployable unemployable is offline

    Los Angeles, CA
    United States

    Posts: 870
    Joined: Mar 11

    Nov 22nd, 2011 (11/22/2011 12:02am) in reply to sirjwab

     
    Originally Posted by sirjwab View Post

    I think you are wrong. Since 65 isnt a complete raise player C can make it 90 and just complete the raise.

    no sir, i am positive i am right. you want to raise you raise over the amount you are facing. Say player B went all in for $85, does player C saying "I want to raise dealer, lets make it $90 to go" make sense?

    edit: to add. floor people and casinos (not to mention home gamers) make wrong rulings regularly. don't take a past ruling as the gospel necessarily. if i had any doubt i would look up the ruling but i don't and i'm lazy.
    Edited By: unemployable Nov 22nd, 2011 at 12:10 AM
Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 11

Similar Threads