Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1.  
  2. <p>talk to jeffbowski about playing volume</p>
  3. <p>How does the 87-table micro hourly compare to the restaurant business?  My ears would start bleeding after hour 3.</p>
  4. <p>87 tournaments in one day $197 ROI guess we measure success in different ways.</p>
  5. <p>its nateavensonpoker.com and you're a beast.  </p>
     
  6. <p>I am more interested in what the hourly rate would be. In the case above, it is not great. In fact, there are much easier, less stressful and guaranteed ways to earn a lot more than $197 for a full day's work.</p>
    <p>I would prefer playing 2 180 seaters simultaneously for $20 +$2, knowing at the outset that I will need to play 4 hours or so if I go deep. If I win, I am winning $1,040 for 4 hours work (i.e. $250 per hour) and an ROI of 5000%.</p>
    <p>For a guarantee, IT consulting pays a great hourly rate and is less stressful.</p>
  7. <p>pft 87 is nothing.  i played 162 on dec 31 2008</p>
     
  8. <p>87 tourneys is a lot for one day. But it is a rediculously small sample from which to attempt to derive any meaningful info. </p>
    <p>wny2nyc47, I would imagine that if I played 87 multis a day, every day, I could pretty easily sustain, at the very least, a 50% ROI. If my avg total buyins stayed at ~$1000 during that period, and my avg daily hours was ~15, the expected hourly return would be $33.33/hr. I was making ~$12/hr when I left the restaurant industry. The two don't even really compare.</p>
    <p>JonesZ, I guess we do measure success differently. I tend to look at things a little more long term(46% ROI this year,~$33/hr), while you tend to meassure success based on the amount won or lost on a given day. If I, or any other mtt pro for that matter, measured success based on daily changes to our bottom lines, we would think ourselves to be losers, since most day totals are red, and in parenthesis)</p>
    <p>Darkhelmet13, I own both nateavenson.com and nateavensonpoker.com, same place, different address.</p>
    <p>Sherlock, I calculated the expected hourly return in my reply to wny2nyc47. To me, that is how much I earned on Sunday. Actual outcomes are arbitrary, long term expected value is all that really matters in poker. As for playing the 2 $20 180's in 4 hours, why not win them both in your example? Then your ROI would be 10,000%!!! In reality, I think sustaining a 100% ROI might be possible if you only two table the 180's. 100% ROI = $44 per 4 hours session = $11 an hour. I'd probably go back to restaurants before "grinding" two tables at that rate. IT consulting, while profitable over even the smallest sample, does not provide much opportunity for increasing returns over time, probably why it is so stress free.</p>
    <p>POKERDUUDE,</p>
    <p>I thought deebs 100 was pretty sick, 162 is nasty. I wonder how many 180's I could play in a day? 15/hr for 12 hours would be 180. Look for "180 180's in 1 day" thread in near future....</p>
     
  9. <p>"I would prefer playing 2 180 seaters simultaneously for $20 +$2, knowing at the outset that I will need to play 4 hours or so if I go deep. If I win, I am winning $1,040 for 4 hours work (i.e. $250 per hour) and an ROI of 5000%."</p>
    <p>_____________________</p>
    <p>lol @ this. statistics 101 ftw.</p>
  10. <p>Wow very impressive. I play about 50 every sunday, stakes from 26-130. </p>
    <p>On the subect of ROI i cant even belive they brought it up in the article as 87 tourney's is absolutly nothing to a MTT pro. like Nate said most days are in the red. period. In fact many months are in the red. In terms of MTT's the word ROI shouldn't even be brought up till you have at least 1000, and even then its very arbitrary.</p>
     1
  11. <p>Nice Job Nate, Well Played</p>