Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Article: Considering Variables Against Ranges

Reply to Thread
  1. Bond18 Bond18 is offline

    Melbourne
    Australia

    Posts: 241
    Joined: Oct 06

    Sep 2nd, 2009 (9/2/2009 5:38pm)

     2
  2. Crazy Gauge Crazy Gauge is offline

    Greensboro, NC
    United States

    Posts: 319
    Joined: May 06

    Sep 2nd, 2009 (9/2/2009 6:52pm) in reply to Bond18

    <p>nice as usual bond</p>
  3. driftdc5 driftdc5 is offline

    Syosset, NY
    United States

    Posts: 474
    Joined: Oct 06

    Sep 2nd, 2009 (9/2/2009 9:05pm) in reply to Bond18

    <p>one of the best articles ive read on this site</p>
     
  4. I Spew Chips I Spew Chips is offline

    United States

    Posts: 2,763
    Joined: May 07

    Sep 3rd, 2009 (9/3/2009 2:22am) in reply to Bond18

    <p>A+</p>
     
  5. Col. frobin Col. frobin is offline Disabled account

    NC
    United States

    Posts: 70
    Joined: Sep 08

    Sep 3rd, 2009 (9/3/2009 3:22am) in reply to Bond18

    <p>EPIC ARTICLE ...CONFIRMED</p>
  6. jasament jasament is offline

    Manhattan, NY
    United States

    Posts: 85
    Joined: May 08

    Sep 3rd, 2009 (9/3/2009 11:42am) in reply to Bond18

    <p>great article...yo bond, does luckychewy raise a weak ace in that spot as well? basicaly..when does it become more profitable to just call, ie where does that guys block bet range end and bet/call range begin....</p>
  7. StayCalm StayCalm is offline

    Posts: 671
    Joined: Jul 08

    Sep 3rd, 2009 (9/3/2009 7:30pm) in reply to Bond18

    <p>"great article...yo bond, does luckychewy raise a weak ace in that spot as well? basicaly..when does it become more profitable to just call, ie where does that guys block bet range end and bet/call range begin...."</p>
    <p>+1</p>
  8. Bond18 Bond18 is offline

    Melbourne
    Australia

    Posts: 241
    Joined: Oct 06

    Sep 3rd, 2009 (9/3/2009 8:45pm) in reply to Bond18

    <p>That will heavily depend on how weak his ace is, and how wide he thinks the BB is defending. If he had a mid ace of like A6-AT and he thinks the BB only defends AT+ in that spot, then I absolutely think he would because the value of his top pair is little more than the pair of his 7 against the villains range, particularly since villain almost never has just a random K here (I mean what's he gonna do, randomly float OOP with KQ?)</p>
     2
    Thread Starter
  9. RioMata RioMata is offline

    Klamath Falls, OR
    United States

    Posts: 220
    Joined: Jun 08

    Sep 7th, 2009 (9/7/2009 10:28am) in reply to Bond18

    <p>Villain plays a flopped set that way as well.</p>
     
Reply to Thread