[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
<p>Doug, there is little difference between 29 and 43 big blinds. As buy-in increases so does aggression, so the stack sizes aren't much different. And lets be real, the problem just gets worse and worse as the final table comes to a close. Maybe you should make those time level increases a little more significant.</p>
-
<p>hide feature</p>
<p>'yes'</p>
<p>thank the lord</p>
-
<p>notice rakeback wasn't brought up even though a ton of people asked about it in the thread earlier this week</p>
-
<p>ty for the time doug.</p>
-
<p>I was hoping the rakeback issue was addressed as well. I would play a lot more on full tilt if I could actually get rakeback.</p>
-
<p>Of course they aren't going to address rakeback. If you signed up for FTP before you knew what rakeback was, one of their friends likely cashes checks on your behalf every month and you will never see a dime of it. Then, being classy, they'll add to the insult to loyal players by randomly dispensing 10k bonuses to some players who should have rakeback while doing absolutely nothing whatsoever for the other players who've been regs there for years, paid tons in rake, and gotten nothing back for it. You have no leverage so they're going to screw you and continue to target most of their bonuses and promotions at noobs since you are going to play there anyways...</p>
-
<p>wish someone asked about the search feature...that can be improved upon..i like how stars does it</p>
Similar Threads
- 4 Replies
-
10 Replies
Why don't the full tilt rebuys draw larger fields?
By Mennas Joint in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Apr 17th, 2007, 07:33 AM - 6 Replies










