Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1.  
  2. <p>Nice article.  I'm torn on whether these are worth playing.  Unless you really can dominate (winning 3 of the 5 prize pools), you likely will not double your buy in playing, and there is always a chance of finishing out of the money in all 4 matches (which I did a few times).  </p>
    <p>I do agree though, you really do need to win these events to make them worthwhile.  </p>
  3. <p>These are not worth playing when looking at $ per hour.  Payouts are just too small in comparison to the buy-in. What they are useful for is practicing SNG strategies and experimentation. As has been noted before, play does differ in the various buy-in levels for SNG's somewhat. The level of play in a $20 SNG is somewhat better than that in a $5. In the case of a Matrix tourney, for $20 you basically get 4X the experience against $20 opponents. If viewed in that light, they might be worth while for somebody on a downswing to re-examine some of their play or the player moving from beginner to intermediate and needing to gain some experience. They could aslo be used for players not used to multi tabling but wanting to get their feet wet without stepping down to a lower buy-in to do so. </p>
  4. <p>nice analysis, gl grapsfan</p>
     
  5. <p>love the plo matrix. play them everytime they r goin. the 220 and 330.</p>
     
  6. <p>Let me just get this straight.  In a regular $11 SNG, the winner would receive $45.  But in this format, to win all four SNGs and the matrix bonus would payout $54.</p>
    <p>IMO this does not seem profitable, even if you do only have to buyin once.</p>
  7. <p>They are a good variance reducer. I play PLO8 matrix sng's and if I bust out one of the tables, I usually cash at 2 or 3 other tables and sometimes Matrix pool as well. Since you play 4 tables against the same guys you pretty soon get some 'reads'n them. Who is overly aggro, who folds quickly etc.</p>
  8. <p>Pod, that isn't exactly true, if you win all 4 tournaments, you are the "dominatrix" and you would receive 100% of the matrix pool prize (so basically you would get 6 1st place finishes instead of 5).</p>
  9. <p>POD, you cant compare an $11 matrix to an $11 sng, the matrix is as if u are playing 4 sngs of approxamitly 1/4 the buy in. if u are rolled for $11 sngs u can defenitly play higher than $11 matrixs</p>
     
  10. <p>Definitely true that you should play a higher-buy Matrix than you normally would play a single-table SNG.  Whether or not you should play a straight-up 4x the buy-in (a $5 SNG player would play a $20 Matrix) depends on how good you are multi-tabling.</p>
     
    Thread Starter
  11. <p>yea Pod the Bod in a 11 sng 1st pays 45 but in a 11 matrix its like plays 2s</p>
     
  12. <p>good article. It sounds kinda like the poker superstars idea. I'd think it'll cut down on variance..def about to try these out. </p>
  13. <p>I think that the MATRIX is great</p>
    <p>for example the 110$ entry u have 4 games.</p>
    <p>If u cash in 1 you win 90$ thats 20$ short of the buy in.</p>
    <p>If u cash in top 3 in the others its all profit. (+total matrix)</p>
    <p>bad beats come and go and when playing 110$ SNG's ur AA can be cracked by 44..well in Matrix u take the bad beat into consideration and thats when u have other chances to get even-win money.</p>
    <p>Yes, its true u dont win as much but is it worth playing and is it profitable.. COURSE!</p>
    <p>i enjoy them...GL</p>
     
  14. <p>I played this fad once-saw alot of donlish plays would rather play 4 solid 1-table SnG's and make a better profit.</p>
  15. <p>I Just played a $33 Matrix, won three of the four SNGs and still only split the Matrix fund with another player, due to his superior knockouts!  This seems wrong to me.  Wouldn't it be better to have 2 points for survival and 1 for KOs, seeing as KOs are more down to luck?</p>
    <p>Still, they're a good concept if you have, say, an hour and a half and want some multi-table action.  Serious SNGers will be better off elsewhere though, I think.</p>