Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. Have Interstate instead --- create a non-profit organization that is regulated by the federal government that takes memberships. The members would be the states and tribes. They would be able to chose to participate or not in online poker. A pandoras box wouldn't be opened because the non-profit would sanction what poker sites would be able to participate. Based on track records from the members and players. Have several non-profits working together monitoring traffic, regulations, security etc. Keep it out of the hands of fat cat lobbist. What has more money potenticial a progressive slot machine or a house slot machine. If you limit online poker to a state or two even. You will not get anywhere near 41 billion in 100 years. Its a total package potential not easily broken up into egual pieces. I digressed a bit LOL a lot
  2. Indians can be so selfish and self-serving at times.
  3. They'd probably only allow limit poker as our brick and mortar here allows. If it was intrastate. That would suck if they could control the software in that way.
  4. they have saturated areas with indian casinos and if some crash than so what,businesses fail all the time and an indian casino is no different
     1