[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
<p>good research graps!</p>
-
<p> Very cool work graps. I noticed that when I play HORSE cash games the FPPs add up pretty quick.</p>
-
<p>good stuff graps</p>
-
<p>Of course none of these hold a candle to turbo sng's</p>
-
<p>lol nm... totally missed the 2nd half of the article</p>
-
<p>FPPs are not necessarily good, especially at FTP. $1 in rake in every cash game is a FPP at FTP. Also in split pot games, the pot is often divided making them even harder to beat the rake. I would also consider 1-2 nl equivilent to a 3-6 limit game since the cost per round in blinds are similar. FPPs would be similar for those games. It would be better to play 9 handed vs. 6 handed for FPPs, since FPPS are determined by the pot rake. What would be more impressive stat is possible win rate per hand for the game you play. To me that would be non-turbo rebuy MTTs. But, thanks for the stats.</p>
-
<p>awesome graps have been looking for some concrete numbers on this. Is $3/$6 limit too large for a $2k roll?</p>
-
<p>Nice one Graps. Supanova here I come!!!!</p>
-
<p>nice article, though the conclusions are somewhat misleading, as 20-tabling turbo SNG's is a definite possibility, while 20-tabling LHE is not (same goes for comparing other game types)</p>










