Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1.  
  2. <p>Nice article Graps. I wish I could take a shot once in awhile but in this economy for a working man on a tight budget its hard. I would hate to stay Micro for life.</p>
  3. <p>nice article sir...</p>
     
  4. <p>Good article, but I've always wondered with those types of tables, are the buy-ins = to full buy-ins, or should they be equal to the buy-in you usually do at a given level? Ex 2/4 PLO if you buy-in 240$ loads as oppose to 400$ loads.</p>
  5. <p>People seem to like me because I am polite and I am rarely late.</p>
    <p>(Hold one time)</p>
  6. <p>Question: When talking about buy-ins are you refering to playing one table?  If so, when playing multiple tables should i multiply the amount of tables vs. 40 - 50 buy-ins?</p>
  7. <p>I think ur talking about me!. I have run $300 up to about $4,000 on Full Tilt, and am still playing mostly $5-10 MTT's & SNG's. My OPR for last yr was over 98%. Sounds like I should be taking some bigger shots, huh? The money is 'fun' money for me.</p>
  8. <p>Hey Randy dont throw your shoulder out patting yourself on the back </p>
  9. <p>another beneficial article! Great writing Graps</p>
     
  10. <p>Question: When talking about buy-ins are you refering to playing one table?  If so, when playing multiple SnG or NL tables should i multiply the amount of tables vs. 40 - 50 buy-ins, 30 - 45 buy-ins?</p>
  11. <p>I have a feeling this article is going mean trouble for me.  :) </p>
  12. <p>I sure am. It's been the only poker skill I've had.</p>
  13. <p>nice edit graps, and yw ;)</p>
     1
  14. <p>Great article, thanks!</p>
  15. <p>Nice article, Graps... I am definitely a bankroll nit, though not nearly as bad as your friend.  Well played.</p>
  16. <p>MJIY, I consider a buy-in for NL/PL cash games to be the traditional table max (100 BBs).  I suppose if you're short-stacking, and reducing the variance that way, you could use a smaller number.</p>
    <p>JonJack, unless you have a severe drop-off in your ROI multi-tabling, I would use the same BR requirements for each table.  If I've got $600, I'm still multi-tabling $10 SNGs.  Bump the buy-in range up a little bit to counteract the fact that you're sacrificing a little bit of ROI.  But I wouldn't do anything as drastic as cutting my buy-in level in half.</p>
    <p>Thanks for reading, everyone....</p>
     
    Thread Starter
  17. <p>I think it's also about playing where you have an edge despite your bankroll. I'm playing $33 SNGs at the moment and am rolled to be playing a lot higher than that. I'm not confident that I have beaten the $33s yet, so I stay there.</p>
  18. <p>ok so i have been multi tabling $6 tables with a bankroll i went from 200 to 1200 now...mostly playin sit n gos? i like the turbos so move up to the $16 range? and 1200 roll for now stick to the low buy in tourneys....????</p>
  19. <p>I guess I should stop playing $1 tournies with a 1k bankroll</p>
  20. <p>Guys, </p>
    <p>Using the PRO (45 buy-ins)  Bankroll for NL25. I have a $4.500,00 BR. I  play 4 tables at once. Can i play more than 4 tables based on my BR? </p>
    <p>And, what is the right % to cash out and to save to go up to my next limit (NL50)???</p>
    <p>Thanks guys</p>
    <p>ALL innnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn</p>
  21. <p>Guilty as charged :(</p>
  22. <p>free rolls are not even close to a real 10,000 person mtt, they are like playing a lotto. ur friend is just lucky</p>
  23. <p>Bankrollus Nittitus- ahahahahahaahhahahahaaha</p>
  24. <p>Alright now i can go bust again  GUILT FREE !WWWEEEEEEEEEE 102OS NEVER LOOKED SO GOOD.</p>

Similar Threads