Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. How do people proceed in this spot after this guys opens 4.25x...........We are 35 to go, 27 make the money.

    Stage #41826526 Tourney ID 5092628 Holdem Multi Normal Tournament No Limit 1,200 - 2010-02-12 01:24:14.015 (ET) [ 2010-02-12 01:24:14 ]
    Table: 8 (Real Money) Seat #6 is the dealer
    Seat 6 - MHODDI (27,855 in chips)
    Seat 7 - N_FROST_10 (37,279 in chips)
    Seat 8 - JKNACK19 (92,523 in chips)
    Seat 9 - 6STRINGERMOM (9,922 in chips)
    Seat 1 - KCRUSE11 (28,830 in chips)
    Seat 2 - ONETIME69 (27,026 in chips)
    Seat 3 - TAKEURSTACK (31,591 in chips)
    Seat 4 - FLORIDASLIM3 (11,074 in chips)
    Seat 5 - IRAISEDUCKS2 (34,100 in chips)
    KCRUSE11 - Ante 100
    ONETIME69 - Ante 100
    TAKEURSTACK - Ante 100
    FLORIDASLIM3 - Ante 100
    IRAISEDUCKS2 - Ante 100
    MHODDI - Ante 100
    N_FROST_10 - Ante 100
    JKNACK19 - Ante 100
    6STRINGERMOM - Ante 100
    N_FROST_10 - Posts small blind 600
    JKNACK19 - Posts big blind 1,200
    *** POCKET CARDS ***
    Dealt to N_FROST_10 [10s 10c]
    6STRINGERMOM - Folds
    KCRUSE11 - Folds
    ONETIME69 - Folds
    TAKEURSTACK - Raises 5,100 to 5,100
    FLORIDASLIM3 - Folds
    IRAISEDUCKS2 - Folds
    MHODDI - Folds (Preselection)
    N_FROST_10
     
  2. i wager all of my beebs
  3. I shove. Also, does UB really put it in the HH as 1010?? That's so ugly. It's TT people!
  4. wager all ur chips and laugh when he folds or when you hold vs his pocket sixes, KJo, etc
     
  5. 4x = kk
     
  6.  
    Originally Posted by Goal4Ziggy View Post

    I shove. Also, does UB really put it in the HH as 1010?? That's so ugly. It's TT people!

    im just curious does that logic make 99 = NN
  7.  
    Originally Posted by mtstackin88 View Post

    i wager all of my beebs

     
  8. looks like the guy just mashed the bet pot button. He's probably terrible. Shove.
  9.  
    Originally Posted by nuttedup View Post


    looks like the guy just mashed the bet pot button. He's probably terrible. Shove.

  10.  
    Originally Posted by Dissident View Post

    im just curious does that logic make 99 = NN

    no, because 99 is already only two characters. The point is to make it uniform so all hands are two numbers or two letters. 1010 is the only one that breaks this convention.
    It's just more readable.
  11.  
    Originally Posted by Dissident View Post

    im just curious does that logic make 99 = NN

    yes obv it goes

    TT
    TT
    FF
    FF
    SS
    SS
    EE
    NN
    TT
    JJ
    QQ
    KK
    AA
  12. raises 5,100 to 5,100? Shouldn't that be raises 3,900 to 5,100?
  13.  
    Originally Posted by aad View Post

    raises 5,100 to 5,100? Shouldn't that be raises 3,900 to 5,100?

    Yes that is how they do their HH's and yes they use 1010 instead of TT.
     
    Thread Starter
  14. I hate TT so much. I never know where I am and there's no such thing as an easy decision.

    You've got an M of 13 or so. You've got over 30 BBs. I hate that spot so much. You're neither the big stack that can freely gamble and you're not short stacked to go hyper aggressive and gamble.

    I read a piece by Andy Bloch once that TT actually performs better against Top 25% hands than people realize. I'm too lazy to go back and look up the numbers but it's in the FTP Strategy Guide.

    That being said, I would give some weight as to how the guy who raised has been playing.

    Is this the first hand he's played in a few orbits? Do you get a sense that he's squeezing the bubble looking to cash? If so, you have to give him a range of AA, KK, QQ, JJ, AK, and MAYBE AQ.

    Has he been aggressive looking to capitalize on the bubble? There's a good chance that TT is the best hand or at least a coin flip.

    1) If you think his range is on the broader side, you can push and you might have some fold equity.

    2) If you think he's capable of calling with AK, AQ, AJ you're flipping.

    Are you willing to flip a coin here if he has AK, AQ, AJ? It might not be a bad spot in a MTT. Yeah, there's a chance you bubble. But if you win the flip, you're putting yourself in position to go really deep. Long term, that's more valuable than min cashing.

    If he's really tight, my spidey sense might tell me I'm behind. But otherwise, I'm willing to flip a coin here if he calls. You have to be willing to gamble to go deep in these things. Of course, looking at your profile, you know this a lot better than I do. LOL
  15.  
    Originally Posted by FabulousTexan View Post

    I hate TT so much. I never know where I am and there's no such thing as an easy decision.

    You've got an M of 13 or so. You've got over 30 BBs. I hate that spot so much. You're neither the big stack that can freely gamble and you're not short stacked to go hyper aggressive and gamble.

    I read a piece by Andy Bloch once that TT actually performs better against Top 25% hands than people realize. I'm too lazy to go back and look up the numbers but it's in the FTP Strategy Guide.

    That being said, I would give some weight as to how the guy who raised has been playing.

    Is this the first hand he's played in a few orbits? Do you get a sense that he's squeezing the bubble looking to cash? If so, you have to give him a range of AA, KK, QQ, JJ, AK, and MAYBE AQ.

    Has he been aggressive looking to capitalize on the bubble? There's a good chance that TT is the best hand or at least a coin flip.

    1) If you think his range is on the broader side, you can push and you might have some fold equity.

    2) If you think he's capable of calling with AK, AQ, AJ you're flipping.

    Are you willing to flip a coin here if he has AK, AQ, AJ? It might not be a bad spot in a MTT. Yeah, there's a chance you bubble. But if you win the flip, you're putting yourself in position to go really deep. Long term, that's more valuable than min cashing.

    If he's really tight, my spidey sense might tell me I'm behind. But otherwise, I'm willing to flip a coin here if he calls. You have to be willing to gamble to go deep in these things. Of course, looking at your profile, you know this a lot better than I do. LOL

    Great analysis I guess but you failed to recognize or put any thought into his opening raise size. And yes of course I am willing to flip a coin here if I have him on AJ-AK.

    Also you say "1) If you think his range is on the broader side, you can push and you might have some fold equity." HUH. I have fe with 30 bb's here no matter what. The thing is, what does his open raise mean?

    I would have never posted this spot at all, it woulda usually been just a standard spot, but his opening raise size is what made it a different situation.
     
    Thread Starter
  16.  
    Originally Posted by OneTime_10 View Post

    Great analysis I guess but you failed to recognize or put any thought into his opening raise size. And yes of course I am willing to flip a coin here if I have him on AJ-AK.

    Also you say "1) If you think his range is on the broader side, you can push and you might have some fold equity." HUH. I have fe with 30 bb's here no matter what. The thing is what is his open raise mean? Because he isn't laying QQ+,AK even if the effective stacks were 50+ bb's deep and I had more fe.

    I would have never posted this spot at all, it woulda usually been just a standard spot, but his opening raise size is what made it a different situation.

    You're right. You are a genius. You know everything and we know nothing.

    I apologize for taking the time to post a response. Sorry to be a bother.
  17.  
    Originally Posted by FabulousTexan View Post

    You're right. You are a genius. You know everything and we know nothing.

    I apologize for taking the time to post a response. Sorry to be a bother.

    LOL geez go hit a bowl or somethen saddle bags. I simply said you didnt take in account the main reason I posted the HH.

    And don't say "You know everything and we know nothing." b/c I wasn't referring to anyone but you in that response.
     
    Thread Starter
  18.  
    Originally Posted by OneTime_10 View Post

    LOL geez go hit a bowl or somethen saddle bags. I simply said you didnt take in account the main reason I posted the HH.

    And don't say "You know everything and we know nothing." b/c I wasn't referring to anyone but you in that response.

    Good thing you're good at online poker. Because you're pretty shitty when it comes to dealing with people in real life, huh?
  19. hmmm id prob mash the pot button afap
     
  20.  
    Originally Posted by FabulousTexan View Post

    Good thing you're good at online poker. Because you're pretty shitty when it comes to dealing with people in real life, huh?

    Haha u got me bro. But I am not gonna start another drama filled thread so wutev . GL and thx 4 your time and analysis.
     
    Thread Starter
  21. I think his raise sizing pre only means that he's bad at poker, and it def doesnt narrow his range to JJ+/AK
     
  22.  
    Originally Posted by super plaaayer View Post

    I think his raise sizing pre only means that he's bad at poker, and it def doesnt narrow his range to JJ+/AK

    This is a very good point and something I definitely considered when making my decision. If anything, I felt that raise size weighted his range more towards smaller pp's than high pp's.
     
    Thread Starter
  23.  
    Originally Posted by OneTime_10 View Post


    Great analysis I guess but you failed to recognize or put any thought into his opening raise size. And yes of course I am willing to flip a coin here if I have him on AJ-AK.

    Also you say "1) If you think his range is on the broader side, you can push and you might have some fold equity."HUH. I have fe with 30 bb's here no matter what. The thing is, what does his open raise mean?

    I would have never posted this spot at all, it woulda usually been just a standard spot, but his opening raise size is what made it a different situation.

    lol it means he hit the bet pot button.

    100*9+1800+1200(call) + 2700 (raise) = 5100.

    does he always hit the bet pot button? Do you have any reads?

    In general, i'd say that someone opening for pot sized bets this late on is OBV inexperienced and a little scared of their holding - unless there is some sort of information that is missing in your OP. I'm gonna shove here and figure he is going to fold. Unfortunately I am goin also going to assume his calling range is pretty tight and has you dominated, but be that as it may I'm still shoving.

    Calling sucks, because OR range is weighted towards overs and SB should come along with his stack, so now you are playing OOP with 1.5 pots behind, pretty gross if an over flops. That said I might call if I think SB will try and squeeze; then I could snap him off.

    Folding is beyond terrible.
  24.  
    Originally Posted by rayspizza View Post


    lol it means he hit the bet pot button.

    100*9+1800+1200(call) + 2700 (raise) = 5100.

    does he always hit the bet pot button?

    Yea I knew it was a pot bet, and no he was not always hitting the bet pot button. It was the first time he hit bet pot and he was actually mini-raising a lot when opening. He had not opened anything over 3x previous to this. Also, if this had been his standard opening size, I would not have posted this b/c there would have been nothing odd about it.

    And here to go a little further with the question you quoted me on: What does his "bet pot" mean?
     
    Thread Starter
  25.  
    Originally Posted by rayspizza View Post


    lol it means he hit the bet pot button.

    100*9+1800+1200(call) + 2700 (raise) = 5100.

    does he always hit the bet pot button? Do you have any reads?

    In general, i'd say that someone opening for pot sized bets this late on is OBV inexperienced and a little scared of their holding - unless there is some sort of information that is missing in your OP. I'm gonna shove here and figure he is going to fold. Unfortunately I am goin also going to assume his calling range is pretty tight and has you dominated, but be that as it may I'm still shoving.

    Calling sucks, because OR range is weighted towards overs and SB should come along with his stack, so now you are playing OOP with 1.5 pots behind, pretty gross if an over flops. That said I might call if I think SB will try and squeeze; then I could snap him off.

    Folding is beyond terrible.

    Flatting this size bet oop is worse than folding imo.
     
    Thread Starter
  26.  
    Originally Posted by OneTime_10 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by rayspizza View Post


    lol it means he hit the bet pot button.

    100*9+1800+1200(call) + 2700 (raise) = 5100.

    does he always hit the bet pot button?

    Yea I knew it was a pot bet, and no he was not always hitting the bet pot button. It was the first time he hit bet pot and he was actually mini-raising a lot when opening. He had not opened anything over 3x previous to this.

    And here to go a little further with the question you quoted me on: What does his "bet pot" mean?

    Misclick? Hot key mistype? not sure. seems pretty odd. Normally people making strange moves like this are either doing it for a reason or making a mistake.

    Against an unknown I described my line in the post above. Against a guy changing his bet size i'd need more info, but I'm going to assume it is a mistake.

    a 5100 bet commits you if you decide to 3-bet, but so does a 3K. so I doubt he is trying to leverage your stack.

    Have you been calling in the blinds alot (i doubt this but had to ask) or re-stealing often? if so I am more prone to think his raise change is for value.
  27.  
    Originally Posted by OneTime_10 View Post

    Flatting this size bet oop is worse than folding imo.

    Forgive me I meant to say BB, when refering to large stack, in the posts above.

    Not if I think BB is capable (and likely) of squeezing here. The only reason i say this, is because BB is deep and can take a 37K loss easy. that opens his squeezing range IMO.

    But I as I said, in general (against unknowns) yes flatting is terrible.
  28.  
    Originally Posted by rayspizza View Post

    Forgive me I meant to say BB, when refering to large stack, in the posts above.

    Not if I think BB is capable (and likely) of squeezing here. The only reason i say this, is because BB is deep and can take a 37K loss easy. that opens his squeezing range IMO.

    But I as I said, in general (against unknowns) yes flatting is terrible.

    OP is the SB. You mean BB. Yes I know i am nit picking.
  29.  
    Originally Posted by BigStack Husker View Post

     
    Originally Posted by rayspizza View Post

    Forgive me I meant to say BB, when refering to large stack, in the posts above.

    Not if I think BB is capable (and likely) of squeezing here. The only reason i say this, is because BB is deep and can take a 37K loss easy. that opens his squeezing range IMO.

    But I as I said, in general (against unknowns) yes flatting is terrible.

    OP is the SB. You mean BB. Yes I know i am nit picking.

    Isn't that what I said, when I corrected my self?

    For added clarification:
    In my OP I referred to the "SB" as the potential squeezer. That was a mistake I meant to refer to the "BB" as the potential squeezer.
  30. I am not gunna be around for weekend so just gunna post results now.....

    I thought his open was weighted more toward smaller pp's so.....

    N_FROST_10 - All-In(Raise) 36,579 to 37,179
    JKNACK19 - Folds
    TAKEURSTACK - All-In 26,391
    N_FROST_10 - returned (5,688) : not called
    *** FLOP *** [4h 9d Jc]
    *** TURN *** [4h 9d Jc] [Jd]
    *** RIVER *** [4h 9d Jc Jd] [7s]
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    TAKEURSTACK - Shows [Kc Kh] (Two Pair, kings and jacks)
    N_FROST_10 - Shows [10s 10c] (Two Pair, jacks and tens)
    TAKEURSTACK Collects 65,082 from main pot
     
    Thread Starter