Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
pokerstars Game #20157426256: Tournament #106308851, $25+$2 Hold'em No Limit - Level X (400/800) - 2008/09/05 1:09:57 ET
Table '106308851 3' 9-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: BluNTzz549 (10408 in chips)
Seat 2: JuntMonkey (8540 in chips)
Seat 3: easttxboy (2655 in chips)
Seat 4: jonnyjoe17 (1775 in chips)
Seat 5: MartinRogers (3309 in chips)
Seat 6: RAIDERZFAN75 (16977 in chips)
Seat 7: Str8outtaEP (4330 in chips)
Seat 9: ParadiceCity (19506 in chips)
BluNTzz549: posts the ante 50
JuntMonkey: posts the ante 50
easttxboy: posts the ante 50
jonnyjoe17: posts the ante 50
MartinRogers: posts the ante 50
RAIDERZFAN75: posts the ante 50
Str8outtaEP: posts the ante 50
ParadiceCity: posts the ante 50
MartinRogers: posts small blind 400
RAIDERZFAN75: posts big blind 800
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Str8outtaEP [X X]
Str8outtaEP:
For those who play a lot of these-what's ur shoving range here? -
i would think at least 50% or probly higher
-
agree^
-
Keep in mind that you are in 5th place with at least $110 equity, and a loss brings you to $0, while a win brings you to about $170. With three shorter stacks alive on the bubble, you need to watch it a bit.
You are looking at something like 15% max, and probably quite a bit less depending on your opponent's calling ranges. If this was a winner-take-all event, I'd be shoving considerably more than that.
50% is spewy. Please don't follow that advice. -
I'm usually pretty spewy here, but I even think 15% is pretty wide in this spot. Like Jenn said, you're 5th in chips. To add to that, 3 guys < 4.5 BB's, and you'd be shoving into the 2nd big stack's BB. I'm thinking something more along the lines of 10%. I didn't do any math or run any numbers, but I don't think this is the time or place to stick it in with KJo here.
Originally Posted by Jennifear
Keep in mind that you are in 5th place with at least $110 equity, and a loss brings you to $0, while a win brings you to about $170. With three shorter stacks alive on the bubble, you need to watch it a bit.
You are looking at something like 15% max, and probably quite a bit less depending on your opponent's calling ranges. If this was a winner-take-all event, I'd be shoving considerably more than that.
50% is spewy. Please don't follow that advice. -
no chance. it's going to be pretty tight
-
So A8o is a fold?
Originally Posted by Jennifear
Keep in mind that you are in 5th place with at least $110 equity, and a loss brings you to $0, while a win brings you to about $170. With three shorter stacks alive on the bubble, you need to watch it a bit.
You are looking at something like 15% max, and probably quite a bit less depending on your opponent's calling ranges. If this was a winner-take-all event, I'd be shoving considerably more than that.
50% is spewy. Please don't follow that advice. -
Maybe Im just a spewtard but, Im shoving prob at least 40% of my hands here. My first question tho is, how did you get yourself in this spot?
Also I shud add that I love bubbling so maybe that has something to do with it. -
In a normal MTT I'm pushing pretty wide. T8o+
Here you have ICM concerns. I'm thinking you have to be very tight. 99+ & AQ+ -
Umm i think at the ft bubble I had to call a shove in the bb. AT the time i had like 5500ish and the button shove for like 1800ish at 300/6 and lost 40/60. prety sure that's how it went down hard to remmber iwth 6 tbls going, lol
Originally Posted by SloHand
Maybe Im just a spewtard but, Im shoving prob at least 40% of my hands here. My first question tho is, how did you get yourself in this spot?
Also I shud add that I love bubbling so maybe that has something to do with it.
I'd love to get more responses to this I think A8o is pretty close in this spot. Maybe some would say easy fold and maybe it is. I'm not an ICM guy but I understand equity and reevaluating shove in light of the remaining stacks. Being a former mtt'er I was used to running into many more situations mid to lateish where I'd be shoving any two when it was folded to me with 5bb (obv). But I've since learned now that with so many fewer chips in play and with even the biggest stacks less than 20bb shoving ranges need to be adjusted big time, esp at ft, where you actually do have meaningful fold equity with 5-7 bb.
This is especially true in the $27 game. One HUGE diff than the lower levels. In $11 games when a shortish stack shoves, NO ONE can find their fold button. They'll call iwth JTo even if it means they're crippled when they lose. -
Thank you Chicos. This is the adjustment that iwas speaking of in my rambling post above. I've just started to understand and apply this adjustment after having watched and played with some of the top players in these games.
-
A8o is a clear fold.
Shove AJo+ (It might even be AQ) -
Do we really weigh 45 man payouts the same as a 9 man payout? Just a question. I think I am probably shoving A10 + and 88+. A10 and AJ or very reluctant pushes though to be sure. It is important to remember though, shoving UTG of a 9 man table there really could be a lot of hands that can have you in trouble
-
Good post userid363, you bring up a good point that allows me to clear something up.
Originally Posted by userid363
Jennifear, besides what % to shove, aren't we also concerned about shoving aces that are likely to be dominated? In this spot, utg with the crossover ace, I think I'm more likely to shove 7 8 suited than a weak ace
Just because I said 10% max does not mean the "top 10%" of hands. It means the 10% of hands that match up best against the possible calling ranges.
I looked at this hand again, and:
9.4%, 55+ ATs+ AQo+ KTs+ QTs+ JTs
is the most that I would shove here, and probably less.
As far as the "which is better-- 78s or A7o?" debate....
Against a really tight calling range, 78s is better:
<TABLE class=pptSimTable cellSpacing=0 border=1><TBODY><TR class=pptSimLabels><TH>Hand</TH><TH>Pot equity</TH><TH>Wins</TH><TH>Ties</TH></TR><TR class=oddrow><TD class=pptSpec>AA-JJ,AK</TD><TD class=pptEV>70.68%</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>193,119,728</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>1,067,220</TD></TR><TR class=evenrow><TD class=pptSpec>78s</TD><TD class=pptEV>29.32%</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>79,781,692</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>1,067,220</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE class=pptSimTable cellSpacing=0 border=1><TBODY><TR class=pptSimLabels><TH>Hand</TH><TH>Pot equity</TH><TH>Wins</TH><TH>Ties</TH></TR><TR class=oddrow><TD class=pptSpec>AA-JJ,AK</TD><TD class=pptEV>74.37%</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>497,436,492</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>13,719,024</TD></TR><TR class=evenrow><TD class=pptSpec>a7o</TD><TD class=pptEV>25.63%</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>166,916,868</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>13,719,024</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Against someone calling 5% (88+, AJs+, AKo, KQs) it's about even:
<TABLE class=pptSimTable cellSpacing=0 border=1><TBODY><TR class=pptSimLabels><TH>Hand</TH><TH>Pot equity</TH><TH>Wins</TH><TH>Ties</TH></TR><TR class=oddrow><TD class=pptSpec>aa-88,aks-ajs,ako,kqs</TD><TD class=pptEV>71.50%</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>326,808,300</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>2,649,648</TD></TR><TR class=evenrow><TD class=pptSpec>78s</TD><TD class=pptEV>28.50%</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>129,439,524</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>2,649,648</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE class=pptSimTable cellSpacing=0 border=1><TBODY><TR class=pptSimLabels><TH>Hand</TH><TH>Pot equity</TH><TH>Wins</TH><TH>Ties</TH></TR><TR class=oddrow><TD class=pptSpec>aa-88,aks-ajs,ako,kqs</TD><TD class=pptEV>71.53%</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>884,869,200</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>23,472,108</TD></TR><TR class=evenrow><TD class=pptSpec>A7o</TD><TD class=pptEV>28.47%</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>345,065,220</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>23,472,108</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
And against a wider range, A7o is better.
So the tighter the range you face, the better off you are with the suited connectors as opposed to the weak ace.
There's more study on this in this otherwise unrelated article:
An Introduction to Restealing -
Jennifear, are our ICM numbers weighing the same payout structures as a 9 man would? Doesn't the more top heavy structure give way to a slightly wider range?
-
Almost the same. It's funny that nothing has really been written about this. I'll be changing that soon.
If you wanna have some fun, throw the stacks and prizes (45 mans have a 14-10-7-5-4-3-2 structure) in here and you'll see how big the risk is compared to the reward!
ICM Calculator: 10 places -
Man, my 9 man game sucks. Soooooo, can you please just tell me my shove-happy game is still plus ev? LOL looks like Jennifear lessons are close at hand!
-
If most of the players will call with 66+ ATs+ AJo and the BB maybe with 44+ A7s+ A9o+ KJs+ then you can only shove 99+ AQ by ICM/SNGPT.
Similar Threads
-
0 Replies
UTG shoving range on bubble of 45man
By bwtaylor in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Nov 10th, 2010, 08:32 PM -
8 Replies
Shoving Range bvb bubble of $16 with chip lead
By pokerbrat89 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Mar 11th, 2008, 06:13 PM - 5 Replies
- 9 Replies
-
3 Replies
Shoving range against Maniac on bubble in Double Shootout?
By scots_chris in Poker Discussion
Last Post: May 17th, 2007, 11:02 PM










