[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
I've played $6.50 45-man turbos on stars with pretty good success over the last few months and am currently rolled for the $12 45's.
I typically play 8-10 tables at a time and thought a good way to move into the $12 tables would be to play both $6.50's and $12's at the same time (usually 7/3 or 6/4 $6.50/$12). The downside to this is that while I'm playing I have no idea which tables are $6.50 and which are $12, so I play both the way I play the $6.50's.
Is treating the $12's like the $6.50's costing me very much profit?
If it matters, I play a TAG style and I think my Push/Fold ranges are pretty good - especially with 10-14 players left.
~ Fritters -
Hey Fritters. With 8-10 tables I don't see why you couldn't find time to make a pattern on your monitor to show you where each buy-in is. What I used to do is put 6.50's on the left side of my screen, and 3.25's on the right. It's usually very muddled, because sometimes I'll have 6 higher stakes/3 lower stakes games up, and the placement won't be optimal, but it will do the job. I also noticed you disabled your sharkscope stats. I think that might be hurting you, because usually if I check a person's sharkscope stats and they are disabled, I will give him credit for being a good player anyways. I can just check your OPR and see your 22% ROI anyways. If I were you, I'd reenable my sharkscope, and watch the buy-in chart to see how your stats in the $12 are. If you can pull off this mix and still get an 11% ROI in the $12 tourneys, I don't see how badly it could be hurting you.
-
The only diff u should notice is that players go from awful to really bad. There are some regs in the $12 games and you'll notice them quickly. Same style should work fine.
I did the same thing as you mixing 6.50 and 12's and I would have to open the lobby to know which tbl was on. so I don't think there's a significant difference. -
they're fairly close IMO, but $12 FT will typically have 3-6 pretty solid players, as opposed to 6.50 FT with 2-4. Avoid the multitabling regs probably.
-
thanks everyone - all very good advice.
I like the idea of keeping the two buy-in levels separate, but I'm playing on a 15.4" laptop screen and I need to keep the PAHud window visible so that I can make the appropriate changes when I get moved to a different table.
Also, as far a sharkscope goes - I track all my info in PT2 so I don't really have a use for it. I do see your point about people assuming I'm winning big, but I usually assume players with blocked stats are either winning players or they're losing a ton of money.
Incidentally, does anyone here use PAHud for MTT's and have an AHK script that takes care of everything when you get moved to a different table? That would be amazing. -
I subscribe to scope and can still see the persons roi when disabled , I would say that 95% of players that disable their scope are losing BIG. Just what I see.
Similar Threads
-
3 Replies
From 9man non turbos to 6man turbos...
By jaydeez40oz in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jan 20th, 2011, 07:26 PM -
3 Replies
15$ turbos compared to 6$ turbos (STARS)
By Camz in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Mar 7th, 2007, 02:56 PM -
15 Replies
Relating Online Poker Skill to Live Poker Skill
By Killerbees24 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jan 23rd, 2007, 10:12 PM -
6 Replies
How would you rate the skill level of the Stars 9man turbos
By my11freakinGEEZ in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Dec 31st, 2006, 03:31 PM -
3 Replies
Full Tilt SNG turbos or PStars Turbos?
By NazgulPoker in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Dec 19th, 2006, 12:02 PM











