Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. I've played $6.50 45-man turbos on stars with pretty good success over the last few months and am currently rolled for the $12 45's.

    I typically play 8-10 tables at a time and thought a good way to move into the $12 tables would be to play both $6.50's and $12's at the same time (usually 7/3 or 6/4 $6.50/$12). The downside to this is that while I'm playing I have no idea which tables are $6.50 and which are $12, so I play both the way I play the $6.50's.

    Is treating the $12's like the $6.50's costing me very much profit?

    If it matters, I play a TAG style and I think my Push/Fold ranges are pretty good - especially with 10-14 players left.

    ~ Fritters
  2. Hey Fritters. With 8-10 tables I don't see why you couldn't find time to make a pattern on your monitor to show you where each buy-in is. What I used to do is put 6.50's on the left side of my screen, and 3.25's on the right. It's usually very muddled, because sometimes I'll have 6 higher stakes/3 lower stakes games up, and the placement won't be optimal, but it will do the job. I also noticed you disabled your sharkscope stats. I think that might be hurting you, because usually if I check a person's sharkscope stats and they are disabled, I will give him credit for being a good player anyways. I can just check your OPR and see your 22% ROI anyways. If I were you, I'd reenable my sharkscope, and watch the buy-in chart to see how your stats in the $12 are. If you can pull off this mix and still get an 11% ROI in the $12 tourneys, I don't see how badly it could be hurting you.
  3. The only diff u should notice is that players go from awful to really bad. There are some regs in the $12 games and you'll notice them quickly. Same style should work fine.

    I did the same thing as you mixing 6.50 and 12's and I would have to open the lobby to know which tbl was on. so I don't think there's a significant difference.
  4. they're fairly close IMO, but $12 FT will typically have 3-6 pretty solid players, as opposed to 6.50 FT with 2-4. Avoid the multitabling regs probably.
  5. thanks everyone - all very good advice.

    I like the idea of keeping the two buy-in levels separate, but I'm playing on a 15.4" laptop screen and I need to keep the PAHud window visible so that I can make the appropriate changes when I get moved to a different table.

    Also, as far a sharkscope goes - I track all my info in PT2 so I don't really have a use for it. I do see your point about people assuming I'm winning big, but I usually assume players with blocked stats are either winning players or they're losing a ton of money.

    Incidentally, does anyone here use PAHud for MTT's and have an AHK script that takes care of everything when you get moved to a different table? That would be amazing.
    Thread Starter
  6. I usually just click the notes tab on the table and type the buy-in. So when it pops up i can just see it nice and easy.
     
  7. type it in the CHAT the buy in, or NOTES of each table as was said before, soooo simple
     
  8.  
    Originally Posted by rz133 View Post

    I usually just click the notes tab on the table and type the buy-in. So when it pops up i can just see it nice and easy.

    That is brilliant! Thanks!!
    Thread Starter
  9. I subscribe to scope and can still see the persons roi when disabled , I would say that 95% of players that disable their scope are losing BIG. Just what I see.