Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. which ones do you think are more profitable using same buy in value the 13$ 90 mans or 12 180 mans and which do you think one could make more money in grinding 12-16 tables playing a buy raning from 6-24$ on tilt as opposed to just playing the 12-36$ 180 mans on stars
  2. obv stars
  3. stars IMO.
  4.  
    Originally Posted by zeppelinzoso16 View Post

    obv stars

    obv b/c? you can more tables ? the players are worse ? im just curious even with rakeback on full tilt and the KO bonuses that dont get counted on sharkscope
    Thread Starter
  5. im my limited experience the traffic on stars is much greater than tilt, making th 180s much more profitable to multitable
  6. stars. More players = more fish = higher ROI (but also higher variance)
    Edited By: tomdelvinco Jul 23rd, 2010 at 05:34 PM
  7. The stars tourneys just fill so much faster so, even if each individual game isn't as profitable, you can play tons more in the same time frame and thereby profit is maximized on Stars.

    Don't see why you can't play both though. Both are profitable...
  8. I enjoy the 90 man tourneys on full Tilt and they're soft, not much experience with the 180's but 90 mans <$12 r super soft on Full Tilt

Similar Threads