Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. This isn't an attack...I am looking to learn something and if this is a call I'd like to know why. Thanks...and gl in the million Ajk.

    EDIT: Brilliant math thanks to Gags.

    unless ajk has some read that this guy is jamming nearly every hand in the deck, then we need to give him some sort of range...if we assign him the range of the top 50% of the deck (which is really really really wide, most randoms will not shove this wide, even for 5bb)...then our 52s is still not quite a call. it's really close, but mathematically, it's a fold.

    it's 26898 to win 47298...therefore we need 36.24% equity to make this a break even call

    Hand 0: 64.742% 64.04% 00.70% 2820457012 30797108.00 { 22+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J4s+, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, 65s, A2o+, K5o+, Q7o+, J7o+, T8o+, 98o }
    Hand 1: 35.258% 34.56% 00.70% 1521994660 30797108.00 { 52s }

    we don't have the odds vs this extremely wide range. yes, it's close...but we dont' even know if the guy is shoving this wide...therefore calling is going to be -cEV

    pokerstars Game #42536205491: Tournament #305020010, $200+$15 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XVIII (3000/6000) - 2010/04/11 21:23:51 ET
    Table '305020010 162' 9-max Seat #5 is the button
    Seat 1: Geraldinjo79 (152720 in chips)
    Seat 2: hotyogi (55629 in chips)
    Seat 3: JBlaze20 (130950 in chips)
    Seat 4: Gürtler (33498 in chips)
    Seat 5: werpennst23 (139653 in chips)
    Seat 6: YIKESS111 (112184 in chips)
    Seat 7: AJKHoosier1 (255638 in chips)
    Seat 8: Broberti (66464 in chips)
    Seat 9: GetStackd101 (269214 in chips)
    Geraldinjo79: posts the ante 600
    hotyogi: posts the ante 600
    JBlaze20: posts the ante 600
    Gürtler: posts the ante 600
    werpennst23: posts the ante 600
    YIKESS111: posts the ante 600
    AJKHoosier1: posts the ante 600
    Broberti: posts the ante 600
    GetStackd101: posts the ante 600
    YIKESS111: posts small blind 3000
    AJKHoosier1: posts big blind 6000
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Broberti: folds
    GetStackd101: folds
    Geraldinjo79: folds
    hotyogi: folds
    JBlaze20: folds
    Gürtler: raises 26898 to 32898 and is all-in
    werpennst23: folds
    YIKESS111: folds
    AJKHoosier1: calls 26898
    *** FLOP *** [4d Kh 6d]
    *** TURN *** [4d Kh 6d] [4c]
    *** RIVER *** [4d Kh 6d 4c] [As]
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    AJKHoosier1: shows [2d 5d] (a pair of Fours)
    Gürtler: shows [Kc Tc] (two pair, Kings and Fours)
    Gürtler collected 74196 from pot
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 74196 | Rake 0
    Board [4d Kh 6d 4c As]
    Seat 1: Geraldinjo79 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 2: hotyogi folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 3: JBlaze20 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 4: Gürtler showed [Kc Tc] and won (74196) with two pair, Kings and Fours
    Seat 5: werpennst23 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 6: YIKESS111 (small blind) folded before Flop
    Seat 7: AJKHoosier1 (big blind) showed [2d 5d] and lost with a pair of Fours
    Seat 8: Broberti folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 9: GetStackd101 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
  2. Its only a 5.2 bb shove....no prob with the call...altho personally I'm not calling with 5 high....
     
  3. AJK figures villain is shoving big cards.. he has a steel wheel draw + all the low cards he can get for a straight/pair.. Not sure why you are askign questions here.. hes going to usually at least flop an open ender.. maybe even a flush darw.. so why wouldnt he call?
  4. I believe it was 26.6k to call a 47k pot...that's not the right odds to call right?
    Thread Starter
  5. yes its a call, because math says so
  6.  
    Originally Posted by Gettin Daize View Post

    yes its a call, because math says so

    Exactly...so can you explain the math? I see 1.76-1
    Thread Starter
  7. so whats that mean he has to win like 35% of the time right?
  8. Perhaps I'm confused because in a SNG I would never do this but SNGs aren't looking for Chip ev...is it a fold in a SNG and a call in a tourney because you're trying to accumulate chips?
    Thread Starter
  9. i cant explain the math tbh i just know i call there everytime to. doubt its bad and if it is it cant be that bad
  10. Oh don't worry I'm not saying it's bad at all. Just something I didn't know was correct. Two different things :P
    Thread Starter
  11.  
    Originally Posted by mastaofkings View Post

    I believe it was 26.6k to call a 47k pot...that's not the right odds to call right?

    The math is just off a tiny bit so it is -EV this hand, but I think it is +EV in the long run.

    People will be less inclined to shove on him in the future and people might see his call, think he is crazy, and will give him more action in the future.
  12.  
    Originally Posted by DoubleS00ted View Post

    AJK figures villain is shoving big cards.. he has a steel wheel draw + all the low cards he can get for a straight/pair.. Not sure why you are askign questions here.. hes going to usually at least flop an open ender.. maybe even a flush darw.. so why wouldnt he call?

     
    Originally Posted by DoubleS00ted View Post

    AJK figures villain is shoving big cards.. he has a steel wheel draw + all the low cards he can get for a straight/pair.. Not sure why you are askign questions here.. hes going to usually at least flop an open ender.. maybe even a flush darw.. so why wouldnt he call?

    wait, what?
  13. Good response...can you correct my math in the edited OP?
    Thread Starter
  14.  
    Originally Posted by DoubleS00ted View Post

    AJK figures villain is shoving big cards.. he has a steel wheel draw + all the low cards he can get for a straight/pair.. Not sure why you are askign questions here.. hes going to usually at least flop an open ender.. maybe even a flush darw.. so why wouldnt he call?

    pretty much this and nothing else
  15. your shoving any two, he has any two, with dead money. its simple mathematics
     1
  16. it's a fold. might be close vs certain people's jamming range's, but vs a random it's def a fold

    Gags30 is an instructor at PocketFives Training . To get more of his advice and to watch his training videos, click here.

  17. if u guy is having chip, den make a cawl, jeebus. have heart an u will go far!
  18.  
    Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post

    it's a fold. might be close vs certain people's jamming range's, but vs a random it's def a fold

    And now I'm definitely confused. Can you explain the math that makes it a fold Gags? I think everyone would appreciate it. jw.
    Thread Starter
  19.  
    Originally Posted by mastaofkings View Post

    And now I'm definitely confused. Can you explain the math that makes it a fold Gags? I think everyone would appreciate it. jw.

    unless ajk has some read that this guy is jamming nearly every hand in the deck, then we need to give him some sort of range...if we assign him the range of the top 50% of the deck (which is really really really wide, most randoms will not shove this wide, even for 5bb)...then our 52s is still not quite a call. it's really close, but mathematically, it's a fold.

    it's 26898 to win 47298...therefore we need 36.24% equity to make this a break even call

    Hand 0: 64.742% 64.04% 00.70% 2820457012 30797108.00 { 22+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J4s+, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, 65s, A2o+, K5o+, Q7o+, J7o+, T8o+, 98o }
    Hand 1: 35.258% 34.56% 00.70% 1521994660 30797108.00 { 52s }

    we don't have the odds vs this extremely wide range. yes, it's close...but we dont' even know if the guy is shoving this wide...therefore calling is going to be -cEV
  20. Brilliant. Thanks Gags.
    Thread Starter
  21. not a call if your shoving unexploitably

    <span>equity </span> <span>win </span> <span>tie </span> <span> pots won </span> <span>pots tied</span>

    <span>Hand 0: </span> <span>64.985% </span> <span>64.15% </span> <span>00.83% </span> <span> 611849561 </span> <span> 7951451.00 { 22+, A2s+, K2s+, Q5s+, J7s+, T6s+, 96s+, 85s+, 75s, 65s, 54s, A2o+, K6o+, Q9o+, J9o+, T9o, 98o }</span>

    <span>Hand 1: </span> <span>35.015% </span> <span>34.18% </span> <span>00.83% </span> <span> 326000865 </span> <span> 7951451.00 { 5d2d }</span>

    that being said its retardedly close and not thread-worthy.
     
  22.  
    Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post


    it's 26898 to win 47298...therefore we need 36.24% equity to make this a break even call

    How do you figure this out, I have always wondered but just kind of used the 2-1 rule because I didnt know how to figure it out exactly.
  23.  
    Originally Posted by fly44 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post


    it's 26898 to win 47298...therefore we need 36.24% equity to make this a break even call

    How do you figure this out, I have always wondered but just kind of used the 2-1 rule because I didnt know how to figure it out exactly.

    THIS. I always have the same problem.
    3 
  24. gags beat me to it =(
     
  25. 47928/26898 equals 1.7818. So 1.7818 to 1. Add those to get 2.7818 to 1 and divide one by 2.7818=35.9 percent
    Thread Starter
  26. prty much a completely irrelevant decision but i wanted to gamble
    131
  27. its stars, u cant fold any cards with dead money, ez call getting 1.1 to 1 too
     1
  28.  
    Originally Posted by AJKHoosier1 View Post

    prty much a completely irrelevant decision but i wanted to gamble

    Just wanted to note that I wasn't criticizing you at all and you definitely taught me something and probably many others. I didn't realize how close calling with 25d could be....I don't see anything wrong with your play at all...as we all see it's incredibly close.
    Thread Starter
  29.  
    Originally Posted by AJKHoosier1 View Post

    prty much a completely irrelevant decision but i wanted to gamble

    calling off 10% of your stack in the softest tourney ever created in a spot which is for sure -cev especially vs random sunday mil super nit stack off range is certainly not an irrelevant decision and one that is prob costing you a decent amount of $
  30.  
    Originally Posted by jordankickz View Post


    calling off 10% of your stack in the softest tourney ever created in a spot which is for sure -cev especially vs random sunday mil super nit stack off range is certainly not an irrelevant decision and one that is prob costing you a decent amount of $

    literally impossible for this decision to cost me significant money longrun...
    131

Similar Threads