Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. Annie,

    I just listened to the pokerroad interview. (http://www.pokerroad.com/ )

    where you claim this brainwash guy has been trying to blackmail UB.

    Can you explain why the big name players have cash transactions with the fraudulent accounts?

    If you can comment on someone who is trying to blackmail the company you surely can comment on the evidence he provides.
  2. Whether or not the poster was trying to blackmail the company has no bearing on truth or untruth of the postings themselves.

    Annie
  3. Maybe my question wasnt clear, Can you explain why the big name players have cash transactions with the fraudulent accounts?
    Thread Starter
  4.  
    Originally Posted by Edub View Post


    Maybe my question wasnt clear, Can you explain why the big name players have cash transactions with the fraudulent accounts?

  5.  
    Originally Posted by annie duke View Post

    Whether or not the poster was trying to blackmail the company has no bearing on truth or untruth of the postings themselves.

    Annie

    wtf? soooo.....wtf?
  6. Annie, AP and UB are owned by the same people, correct? Phil Tom has mentioned on at least a couple of occasions that his son, Scott Tom, still owns AP. Explain.
     
  7. Annie - I've always wondered why you aren't a Team FT member? Why not just go work w/ yer bro?
     
  8. Annie,

    Right now it is hard to believe that you aren't hiding anything because you simply refuse to answer our questions.
    Thread Starter
  9.  
    Originally Posted by trouble View Post

     
    Originally Posted by Edub View Post


    Maybe my question wasnt clear, Can you explain why the big name players have cash transactions with the fraudulent accounts?

     
  10.  
    Originally Posted by annie duke View Post

    Whether or not the poster was trying to blackmail the company has no bearing on truth or untruth of the postings themselves.

    Annie

    So are we going to get complete listing of all transactions from all accounts that had transfers with verified superuser accounts? Are we going to get an explanation of why brainwashedodo had information valuable enough to blackmail with? Are we going to get and explanation of why instead of full disclosure UB continues to cover their buts just enough to sweep up the latest drama bombs under the rug. All they do is continue to do damage control rather than spilling the beans (hi beenie you stool pigeon) on everything that has happened?

    +EV
  11.  
    Originally Posted by trouble View Post

     
    Originally Posted by Edub View Post


    Maybe my question wasnt clear, Can you explain why the big name players have cash transactions with the fraudulent accounts?

  12. I'm pretty sure about half of two plus two are on there way over to ask Annie questions in this thread.... once they are done listening to the rap stylings of Haim Bajayo. do you own any of his albums Annie?
  13. who cares if he is blackmailing UB. if he is blackmailing UB, that means UB is hiding something. UB is hiding a LOT of information. you cannot deny that annie.
  14. "Are we going to get an explanation of why brainwashedodo had information valuable enough to blackmail with?"

    Maybe I am missing something..But IF he had info valuable enough to Blackmail..wouldn't he have been paid off and never posted the info to begin with?? Just my 2 cents
  15.  
    Originally Posted by MUPokerPlayer View Post

    who cares if he is blackmailing UB. if he is blackmailing UB, that means UB is hiding something. UB is hiding a LOT of information. you cannot deny that annie.

    +

     
    Originally Posted by Edub View Post

    Maybe my question wasnt clear, Can you explain why the big name players have cash transactions with the fraudulent accounts?

    =

    Answer, please.
  16. Annie Duke, can you please explain to me why you are a ** STAFF EDIT **?
    Why you are protecting cheaters?
    Why you are protecting people who are protecting cheaters?
    Why you are associated with a company who simply refuses to disclose information about fraud?

    etc etc

    Or rather than actually answer some questions, maybe you can take the UB Corporate Line and:
    -Answer a question with a random statement that has nothing to do with the actual question
    -Refuse to disclose ANYTHING until it has been PROVEN by 2+2'ers
    -Ignore everybody and everything and hope it all dies down/goes away

    You make me sick
    much love
     
  17. yeah if he is blackmailing UB that just means the information is good enough to be worth something. how many times can she blatantly lie to the poker community saying that the problems were in the past with the "old management" and that everything has been disclosed and rectified. yet every few weeks something new pops up that the "new management" is trying very hard to hide.
  18. Annie is a figurehead, she doesn't have the authority to confirm or deny anything. Hell , we don't even know for sure this is Annie responding, it could be some UB corporate double-talking stooge, sounds like it at least.

    UB is armpit deep in shit, time to cut your losses Annie.
  19. http://www.pocketfives.com/poker-for...osting-2999954

    Various posters in this thread, and many others regarding UB and Annie Duke, should pay particular attention to the 'flaming' section.
  20. and wooooooosh, now she's gone, never to return again.
  21.  
    Originally Posted by SusieQue View Post


    "Are we going to get an explanation of why brainwashedodo had information valuable enough to blackmail with?"

    Maybe I am missing something..But IF he had info valuable enough to Blackmail..wouldn't he have been paid off and never posted the info to begin with?? Just my 2 cents

    HUH? Are you implying that UB would pay off someone to keep their mouth shut?!?!?!

    or are you too, how shall i say this nicely, naive to understand that your scenario makes sense which is why it is even more unbelievable that he was actually "blackmailing" them.

    Either way your 2 cents is worth nada. You schills are relentless
    Thread Starter
  22. I think what you guys are missing is Annie is in the inner circle at UB, she's not a frigin Mascot. Why go you think she lives in Portland and not Vegas?
  23. SOOOOOOO OLD UB = NEWWWWWWWW UB. HMMMMMMMMMMM IF
  24. if im wrong then let me know, but pretty sure the new ub is a friend of the old ub. Plus russ hamilton funded -fred- which in turn funded a superuser. All other names seem to be clear atm.
  25. maybe she doesn't know the answer.
     
  26.  
    Originally Posted by Edub View Post

     
    Originally Posted by SusieQue View Post


    "Are we going to get an explanation of why brainwashedodo had information valuable enough to blackmail with?"

    Maybe I am missing something..But IF he had info valuable enough to Blackmail..wouldn't he have been paid off and never posted the info to begin with?? Just my 2 cents

    HUH? Are you implying that UB would pay off someone to keep their mouth shut?!?!?!

    or are you too, how shall i say this nicely, naive to understand that your scenario makes sense which is why it is even more unbelievable that he was actually "blackmailing" them.

    Either way your 2 cents is worth nada. You schills are relentless

    So I am wrong because it makes sense?
  27. Makes sense
  28. At this point why would anyone even care what UB says or does or anyone working for UB?

    They are clearly liars and anyone that plays there knowing whats going on deserves whatever happens to them.
     
  29. I find it interesting that the assumption is that because I did not respond to EDub imediately that I was dodging the issue rather than that I was out hiking with my children, which is in fact the case.

    At any rate, I will say it again, the management at UB is a new one. As for the stuff being posted on 2+2 I should let UB respond to that not me since I am not a spokesman on this issue and have no interest in being one. That being said, I have no idea how anyone thinks anything on 2+2 implicates the new management. I have read through it and as far as I can see no one in current or recent management at UB is even mentioned there.

    Annie
  30.  
    Originally Posted by annie duke View Post

    I find it interesting that the assumption is that because I did not respond to EDub imediately that I was dodging the issue rather than that I was out hiking with my children, which is in fact the case.

    At any rate, I will say it again, the management at UB is a new one. As for the stuff being posted on 2+2 I should let UB respond to that not me since I am not a spokesman on this issue and have no interest in being one. That being said, I have no idea how anyone thinks anything on 2+2 implicates the new management. I have read through it and as far as I can see no one in current or recent management at UB is even mentioned there.

    Annie

    "-Answer a question with a random statement that has nothing to do with the actual question"
     

Similar Threads