[x]Register Now
-
This is not a brag post. This is an evidence it is not rigged because I win there post. I personally feel cheated at ftp and ps since I can't win as much there. I would go as far and say to me absolute and wpex are the only two non-rigged sites that I have played.
The sample sizes were 200 hands, I would estimate at least one player at every cash game has a VP$IP of over 40% and a BB/100 over 5 with a sample size less than 300. -
link???
-
"Absolute Poker never divulges personal information about our players nor do we make public any hand information that did not go to a showdown, ever."
LOOOOOOOOOL
This is such bullshit, Absolute Poker sent me an email that showed everysingle persons holecards (even if they folded fre flop) from the 1k tourney i took 2nd in to potripper. I asked them for a hh from the ft and they instead sent me an email that showed how every person in that tourney played their hands on every street even when i wasnt even at the table. Thats right i wasnt even there at a certain table and AP sent me hh's showing everyones cards pre next to their stack sizes and then how they played them.
Such sick constant lies from AP!
And yes I still have the email. -
do you still have the email?
-
WOW ^^^^^^^
-
can you make potripper's HH public on PXF?
-
yea I've been meaning to do this, they sent it to him in excel which I thought was weird... as long as an excel file will work we can just transfer it to someone thru aim or w/e
-
<SPAN>A couple of things about ABs explanation seem pretty lame or, at the very least, incomplete.<SPAN> </SPAN><SPAN>AB says, there were several instances where the player merely called on the river. Thus, the allegation that the player accounts at issue never called on the river, they either raised or folded are also without merit.<SPAN> </SPAN>Gee, as if the fact that the superuser just called in several instances is proof that he couldnt see the other players hole cards</SPAN></SPAN>
<SPAN> </SPAN>
<SPAN>AB says <SPAN>there were countless instances where a somewhat unorthodox poker strategy resulted in a loss.<SPAN> </SPAN>Well, nobody ever said the superuser won every time.<SPAN> </SPAN>Notice that AB didnt say that the superusers plays were wrong, just that they didnt always result in a win.<SPAN> </SPAN>E.g., he could have called an all-in bet after the flop with 10 high (which he did).<SPAN> </SPAN>Still, he could have ended up losing the hand.<SPAN> </SPAN>That certainly wouldnt be evidence that he didnt see the other players hole cards.
AB acknowledges the chip dumping.<SPAN> </SPAN>My guess is that they do this so they can say they did investigate and were thorough enough to detect some wrongdoing.<SPAN> </SPAN>Of course, they would never admit theres a flaw with the system, only with the ethics of their players.<SPAN> </SPAN></SPAN></SPAN> -
lol... looking at this HH again it is sickening how obv this is.... NOBODY can play hands the way he is playing them without being able to see the cards... it really is undeniable evidence to anyone who knows poker
-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Good to see Action Jeff on the forums!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
<span>AJ-AJ-AJ-AJ</span> -
The only calls on the river I have seen in any of the HH's were either when a bet put the "super-user" all-in or when his opponent pushed all-in, in other words, when his options were only call or fold.
-
just wait til I put up the HH from the 1k, it's overwhelming evidence that someone has ineed cracked their software and can 100% see hole cards
-
Actually I have seen this happen once before.
I was on VC Poker and the guy to my right left the table at the very moment his hand was dealt.
They were exposed face up for the whole hand. A couple of spades I remember.
Everyone went loopy in chat. I pinged the support but they didnt believe me ! -
heh, didn't think of it like that. why would I be bragging to menlo? Thats like bragging about my free throw skills to michael jordan.

apestyles is an instructor at PocketFives Training . To get more of his advice and to watch his training videos, click here.
-
We need to boycott. Online poker is basically unregulated and the reason they have to police themselves is to stay competitive in the market.
If you believe AP allowed cheating to occur unchecked then you need to boycott AP and UB to help keep online poker as legit as possible.
Seriously, boycott them until action is taken. Don't let them brush this under the rug. -
What response do poker players expect from AP? We examined the evidence and yes there has been major cheating on our website due to security flaws in our software.Poker players can't be that dumb to think that a poker site will ever admit to a flaw in there security system.
-
<H2 class=posttitle id=post-190>Proof That Online Poker Is Rigged!</H2>
One can hardly read any poker forum without running across individuals claiming that this or that site is rigged. Usually they are humiliated with the forum experts rudely telling them that the reason theyre losing is because they arent good poker players. Im sad to say that I used to be one of those experts. I was one of the doubters until I actually caught one site cheating.
If you view the image below it looks like a normal hand being played (certain information has been dedacted to protect the innocent).

It looks normal unless you really examine the photo. Using some highly classified vector digital imaging software from the CIA I picked up on eBay for $50, I caught the dealer dealing off the bottom of the deck. I was as shocked as anyone but it all made sense once I thought about it. Notice in the picture above how they put that little box in front of the players sitting to the right and left of the dealer so as to obstruct their view. Players sitting that close would normally catch a dishonest dealer but conveniently the software blocks their view. Coincidence? Hardly!

But that wasnt the only cheating I caught. Notice the player to the right of the dealer in Seat 1. Notice anything out of place? Neither did I at first. But again, I used my imaging software to get a close up and guess what I see?

Hes got a card hidden up his sleeve! I guess it should have been obvious after his fourth pocket aces in a row.
So now I have proof that online poker is rigged and if anybody tries to tell you differently, theyre in on it! -
hhahahahahahahahahha.
I would like to officially nominate this post for post of the fucking century on any poker forum. Someone get this man an emmy, a grammy, a fucking nobel prize... something. lol. -
yea i saw the HH for this hand earliar. Folds KQ when AA is dealt out, think KJ was dealt out as well. Ive played against many maniacs, and they all go fucking crazy with any two face cards. KQ is bust a nut time for them. Those HH's are cold hard evidence.
-
The problem is that too many players on AP know nothing of this scandal, they don't read the forums etc. AP will live on and they know it.
-
Lirva that has been posted here a ton of times in the past. I know that a lot of newbies may have not seen it. Still funny though.
This is insane this whole AP/SuperUser account. Now with CM & TWK's hard work in the other thread it may be time for AP to come clean or hit the road.
Similar Threads
- 9 Replies
- 22 Replies
-
2 Replies
Honest Question about SuperUser Accounts
By badbeatmenow in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Oct 19th, 2007, 03:26 PM -
0 Replies
New info on the "superuser" account
By Dyzalot in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Oct 16th, 2007, 06:13 PM - 2 Replies








