Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. This is mainly for new MTT players that feel they’re playing well and putting the required effort into their game but just haven’t had a lot of success yet.

    Here is a conversation that *could* have taken place recently between three MTT players…

    Player A: I’m getting frustrated. I recently went 1 for 23 ITM on my Full Tilt account and lost $2,623 of my bankroll in the process.

    Player B: You think that’s bad? I recently went 1 for 32 ITM on stars and lost $4,939 over that streak!

    Player C: Quit your whining you two! In mid September I had a streak on Stars where I went 1 for 51 ITM, losing $21,452, so spare me your tears!

    They sound like a bunch of losing players, eh? Actually, Player A is SCTrojans08, B is lilholdem954, and C is zangbezan24. The moral of the story? Well, there’s two morals here:
    1. <LI class=MsoNormal>You’re going to have bad streaks like this no matter how good you are, so don’t get too discouraged when they happen (especially early in your career). <LI class=MsoNormal>If someone sitting at your table has a 4% ITM over his first 25 MTTs and an ROI of negative 83%, his sample size is too small to immediately conclude he is complete donkey. Watch him closely and make your own conclusions!</LI>
  2. wtf is this ?
  3. What he is trying to say is if you are on a bad run it doesn't mean you are a bad player. Also, dont judge other players based on small sample sizes. Which is all true.
  4. It's also probably easier for experianced players to know when they are running bad vs playing bad. I've been on a "bad run" lately but I don't know how much of it is variance and how much of it is me making mistakes and playing badly.

Similar Threads