[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
I have recently begun playing more 6max NLHE. This graph looks a little odd to me. Am I being too aggressive? Is that possible? As you can see, there was a bit of a learning curve for me at the beginning, but I think I'm learning some things. This graph is while playing between 1 and 4 tables simultaneously, most commonly 2 tables.
-
I would think most of ur winnings should come from showdown winnings where as you're not trying to lose to much, break even, or be a little positive for non-showdown winnings. It looks like thats only for 13k hands though, so due to the sample size, graph isnt really too accurate.
-
any thoughts from the daytime people would be much appreciated.
-
add a few more value bets in there for showdown value on your big hands, aggressions good but still get some fish n chips, they love giving it away
-
Positive solid green is a good sign obviously but somewhat meaningless over this many hands. The other lines don't indicate a good or bad sign. Some of the very best cash players have positive showdown winnings and negative non showdown winnings, some have what you have, and some have both positive. Cash games are really about making the best ev plays in each given situation to maximise the solid green line.
-
Showdown winnings are closely intertwined with pot odds / implied odds for all in pre and on flop situations. You're playing better [at the moment albeit across a small sample] in the smaller pots and playing too over anxiously in the larger pots. The cause of this is necessarily getting all i pre with AK and with mediocre draws on the flop for example. Those things mistakes are much easier to plug than finding a way to plug leaks in the smaller pots in which your average hand strength is going to be significantly weaker AND your knowledge of your opponent's hand range is less [than if he was willing to play a larger pot earlier in the hand as in preflop or on the flop].
-
A mortal enemy at that.
-
hey, quick question. where did you get that graph, did you have to purchase some software? i am looking for a computer program that will track my cash games, not really anything for other players stats, vpip, af, etc. i dont want a program with that stuff, just something that tracks my play. any free ones? thanks guys.
-
Hijack!
Originally Posted by danxxx1
Hey Beaker leave my tiger brethren aloneOriginally Posted by 13Jayhawk13
^^^^This. I was like, wtf, I'm never giving any advice to a tiger. Except the old GFY, which is sound advice for a tiger :)
Rock Chalk
Rock chalk, muck fizzou.
Congrats on an unholy number of tourney wins without a final four. -
what's your stats mupp? vpip, pfr, agg factor
-
it's certainly not optimal but i would take this over a graph where i was losing in non-showdowns.
What is your fold to c-bet % and river AF?
edit: also, the red line indicates how much of a man you are -
I honestly don't understand how people can maintain a positive red line like that. I guess I'm too closed in my thinking. In any case, there is more than one way to skin a cat.
Similar Threads
- 7 Replies
-
31 Replies
Pokerstars sign another "live" pro but why not sign online players???
By tigertonkin in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Feb 27th, 2009, 02:35 AM -
0 Replies
The ultimate sign you're running good... Runner-runner royal flush
Last Post: Feb 22nd, 2009, 01:28 PM -
7 Replies
A sign gigabet is running good these days!
By willhunting9 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: May 22nd, 2007, 04:24 PM










