Is this a pretty standard play on the bubble of a 18 man turbo, obviously all the players in this are retards. These have got to be the most frustrating form of poker ever conceived. Damn 1.75 poker.

PokerStars Game #20090130538: Tournament #105796683, $1.50+$0.25 Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (200/400) - 2008/09/02 - 11:02:27 (ET)
Table '105796683 2' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: you-go-4 it (2670 in chips)
Seat 5: Fenety (3185 in chips)
Seat 6: wetdream1955 (3430 in chips)
Seat 7: peppels13 (3225 in chips)
Seat 8: Snorkle15 (14490 in chips)
you-go-4 it: posts the ante 25
Fenety: posts the ante 25
wetdream1955: posts the ante 25
peppels13: posts the ante 25
Snorkle15: posts the ante 25
Snorkle15: posts small blind 200
you-go-4 it: posts big blind 400
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Fenety [Ts Ks]
Fenety: raises 2760 to 3160 and is all-in
wetdream1955: folds
peppels13: folds
Snorkle15: calls 2960
you-go-4 it: folds
*** FLOP *** [Ad Kc Qc]
*** TURN *** [Ad Kc Qc] [Qs]
*** RIVER *** [Ad Kc Qc Qs] [Td]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Snorkle15: shows [Ac 9c] (two pair, Aces and Queens)
Fenety: shows [Ts Ks] (two pair, Kings and Queens)
Snorkle15 collected 6845 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 6845 | Rake 0
Board [Ad Kc Qc Qs Td]
Seat 1: you-go-4 it (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: Fenety showed [Ts Ks] and lost with two pair, Kings and Queens
Seat 6: wetdream1955 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: peppels13 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: Snorkle15 (small blind) showed [Ac 9c] and won (6845) with two pair, Aces and Queens

Yes, this is standard. Chalk it up and move on. You have like 3.2 M and need to push here. Good call on his part too. Just unlucky.

yeah alright, I was just wondering what my pusing range should be here? I am bubbling a shit load of these with these same plays.

the rake is unreal, but this is the only turbo sng offered for the $1 level, besides the 45 man.

yeah, i don't see why he is a retard.

Not as clear cut as everyone is making it.

<TABLE class=simple cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=3 border=1><TBODY><TR><TH width=40>PU</TH><TH width=40>CA</TH><TH width=40>OC</TH><TH>Range</TH></TR><TR><TD>UTG</TD><TD><TD><TD>20.1%, 22+ A3s+ ATo+ K8s+ KJo+ Q8s+ QJo J8s+ T8s+ 98s<<what you should shove if.... </TD></TR><TR><TD><TD>CO</TD><TD><TD>1.8%, JJ+ <<<cutoff calls this (lol)</TD></TR><TR><TD><TD><TD>BU</TD><TD>0.5%, AA </TD></TR><TR><TD><TD><TD>SB</TD><TD>1.4%, QQ+ </TD></TR><TR><TD><TD><TD>BB</TD><TD>0.5%, AA </TD></TR><TR><TD><TD>BU</TD><TD><TD>1.8%, JJ+ <<button calls this (lol)</TD></TR><TR><TD><TD><TD>SB</TD><TD>1.4%, QQ+ </TD></TR><TR><TD><TD><TD>BB</TD><TD>0.5%, AA </TD></TR><TR><TD><TD>SB</TD><TD><TD>11.2%, 55+ A8s+ ATo+ KQs KQo <<chipleader calls this (possible. but he's likely wider)</TD></TR><TR><TD><TD><TD>BB</TD><TD>0.9%, KK+ </TD></TR><TR><TD><TD>BB</TD><TD><TD>6.8%, 88+ AJs+ AJo+ <<BB calls this (lol)</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

This one is a maybe, and depends on the reads of the table.

It's close either way, so don't feel bad.