Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Just a quick question regarding sellling shares. I'm failing misrebly finding the right info online...
Whats the standards for selling shares?? Ex: Mtt buy in is $100. Buyer buys $50, player plays $50 of his own. What % does the player ship back to the buyer if he/she cashes in the mtt. Lets say they cash for $200.
Thanks! glglglgl today. -
generally the standard is to pay the staker 50% of the equity that hes buying after stakeback,
so in ur case since the staker is putting up 50% of the buyin he would be entitled to 25% of the profits
so if u cashed for $200 ud pay him back his original $50, and then out of the $100 profit ud pay him $25 so hed get $75 total
but obviously any stake can have any type of rules, its all about what the staker and player agree on. -
ok, thats kind of what I thought but wasnt 100% sure. Thanks for the info!
-
i dont rly deal with staking anymore so i could be remembering wrong but im pretty sure that in basicly any stake the staker never gets the full equity of the amount hes buying in for or it just doesnt rly make sense for the player to take the stake. he doesnt gain anything
-
okse is way wrong.
if your'e selling $50 of a $100 mtt for one mtt only, if someone buys $50 worth, they'd get 50% of your action
Gags30 is an instructor at PocketFives Training . To get more of his advice and to watch his training videos, click here.
-
then how is it any different for the player than playing a $50 mtt with his own money. there would be zero gain for the player in taking this stake
-
last time i looked most $100 tourneys have a larger prizepool, yet fewer people to wade through than a $50 mtt
Originally Posted by okse54
then how is it any different for the player than playing a $50 mtt with his own money. there would be zero gain for the player in taking this stake
also, most people don't sell action for $100 mtts, and more do it for tourneys that are big, like let's say 1ks or like live shit like 10ks where first is a lot -
Edited By: okse54 Aug 8th, 2010 at 07:03 PMno that sound right, i was viewing it a bit skewed,Originally Posted by byoonz
am i thinking about mark up incorrectly? if you buy 50% of me in a $1K with 10% markup, you pay me $550 but you still have 50% of my action
i was thinking "50%" aka $500 but with markup i have lets say 45% of ur profits.
in my head i was viewing 50% of action meaning the buyin and not the profit, i think everyone is viewing 50% of action meaning 50% of profit and buyin is seperate -
Gags.. I was just using the $100 as an example for easy math. With out mark up I was just looking for the basic formula.
Originally Posted by Gags30
last time i looked most $100 tourneys have a larger prizepool, yet fewer people to wade through than a $50 mtt
also, most people don't sell action for $100 mtts, and more do it for tourneys that are big, like let's say 1ks or like live shit like 10ks where first is a lot
My thoughts were the player plays for 50% just like any staking deal and the other 50% is used for shares bought.. so 50% bought would actually be 25% for the buyer. -
ok let me say this again...if you're playing in a $100 tournament...and i give you $50 toward your buy in, i would expect 50% of your action
Originally Posted by boondock11
Gags.. I was just using the $100 as an example for easy math. With out mark up I was just looking for the basic formula.
My thoughts were the player plays for 50% just like any staking deal and the other 50% is used for shares bought.. so 50% bought would actually be 25% for the buyer.
/thread -
This just sounds REALLY wrong imo.
Originally Posted by okse54
generally the standard is to pay the staker 50% of the equity that hes buying after stakeback,
so in ur case since the staker is putting up 50% of the buyin he would be entitled to 25% of the profits
so if u cashed for $200 ud pay him back his original $50, and then out of the $100 profit ud pay him $25 so hed get $75 total
but obviously any stake can have any type of rules, its all about what the staker and player agree on.
If I buy 50% of someone, i expect to get 50% of the profits. -
Apes - this is normally true if you just doing it for a tourney or two and there is no make-up.. Once you involve make-up, I tend to agree with Okse.. it really just depends on what kind of deal is going on..
-
sort of off topic, but just be sure you dont sell 110+% of your shares and then TID and owe money, story of this happening a few years ago.
-
so if u gave someone $100 for their $100 buyin (which i think a large portion of stakes are for the whole buyin), do u expect 100% of the profits?
-
well obv not. like someone said earlier the types of stakes that cover the whole buy-in are usually long-term agreements that involve make-up.
Originally Posted by okse54
so if u gave someone $100 for their $100 buyin (which i think a large portion of stakes are for the whole buyin), do u expect 100% of the profits?
people sell shares to mitigate their financial risk. it's usually a one-time thing where the player wants to play something that is over their comfort level (for example ,me in the 3.5k WPT event coming up). gags is 100% right on the way these work, the investor gets the % of profit that he/she invested of the total buy-in. Sometimes the seller can charge a small mark-up (it usually seems to be 10-20%) to sweeten the deal for them - since they are the ones actually playing. -
okse u are pretty far off in this thread.
If you buy 50% of someone you have 50% of what they cash for. -
Originally Posted by okse54
so if u gave someone $100 for their $100 buyin (which i think a large portion of stakes are for the whole buyin), do u expect 100% of the profits?
if i was backing someone for one touranment and one tournament only they would clearly need SOME incentive to play well. taking 100% of their profits seems a little over the top..but asking for 70-90% of their profits is not out of the ordinary -
yep, it's actually fairly common on the Other site and chipmeup.com









