Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. Just a quick question regarding sellling shares. I'm failing misrebly finding the right info online...

    Whats the standards for selling shares?? Ex: Mtt buy in is $100. Buyer buys $50, player plays $50 of his own. What % does the player ship back to the buyer if he/she cashes in the mtt. Lets say they cash for $200.

    Thanks! glglglgl today.
  2. generally the standard is to pay the staker 50% of the equity that hes buying after stakeback,

    so in ur case since the staker is putting up 50% of the buyin he would be entitled to 25% of the profits

    so if u cashed for $200 ud pay him back his original $50, and then out of the $100 profit ud pay him $25 so hed get $75 total

    but obviously any stake can have any type of rules, its all about what the staker and player agree on.
     
  3. ok, thats kind of what I thought but wasnt 100% sure. Thanks for the info!
    Thread Starter
  4. Pretty sure if u sold 50% he would get 50% of profit , unlike a normal long-term deal like okse is saying. U could sell at a mark up tho
    Edited By: Iplaythabored Aug 8th, 2010 at 06:26 PM
     
  5.  
    Originally Posted by Iplaythabored View Post

    Pretty sure if u sold 50% he would get 50% of profit , unlike a normal long-term deal like okse is saying

    i this were true the stake would be pretty useless and would be the equivilant of u playing a tourny thats half the buyin with ur own money
     
  6. Isn't that how baps work?
     
  7.  
    Originally Posted by Iplaythabored View Post

    Isn't that how baps work?

    i dont rly deal with staking anymore so i could be remembering wrong but im pretty sure that in basicly any stake the staker never gets the full equity of the amount hes buying in for or it just doesnt rly make sense for the player to take the stake. he doesnt gain anything
     
  8. thats why people sell w/ shares marked up
     
  9.  
    Originally Posted by Iplaythabored View Post

    thats why people sell w/ shares marked up

    so then we are both saying the same thing and just mixing up our lingo

    i think we would both agree that if i buy $50 of the $100 buyin and he cashes for $200 i dont get back $100, correct?
     
  10. okse is way wrong.

    if your'e selling $50 of a $100 mtt for one mtt only, if someone buys $50 worth, they'd get 50% of your action

    Gags30 is an instructor at PocketFives Training . To get more of his advice and to watch his training videos, click here.

  11.  
    Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post

    okse is way wrong.

    if your'e selling $50 of a $100 mtt for one mtt only, if someone buys $50 worth, they'd get 50% of your action

    then how is it any different for the player than playing a $50 mtt with his own money. there would be zero gain for the player in taking this stake
     
  12. because if you want to play a big buyin mtt, you can just sell part of yourself so you arent putting up a huge amount of your bankroll or anythin like that. and you can always markup so you make a lil bit
     
  13.  
    Originally Posted by byoonz View Post

    because if you want to play a big buyin mtt, you can just sell part of yourself so you arent putting up a huge amount of your bankroll or anythin like that. and you can always markup so you make a lil bit

    once u mark it up the staker doesnt have 50%
     
  14.  
    Originally Posted by okse54 View Post

    then how is it any different for the player than playing a $50 mtt with his own money. there would be zero gain for the player in taking this stake

    last time i looked most $100 tourneys have a larger prizepool, yet fewer people to wade through than a $50 mtt

    also, most people don't sell action for $100 mtts, and more do it for tourneys that are big, like let's say 1ks or like live shit like 10ks where first is a lot
  15.  
    Originally Posted by okse54 View Post

    once u mark it up the staker doesnt have 50%

    am i thinking about mark up incorrectly? if you buy 50% of me in a $1K with 10% markup, you pay me $550 but you still have 50% of my action
     
  16.  
    Originally Posted by byoonz View Post

    am i thinking about mark up incorrectly? if you buy 50% of me in a $1K with 10% markup, you pay me $550 but you still have 50% of my action

    no that sound right, i was viewing it a bit skewed,

    i was thinking "50%" aka $500 but with markup i have lets say 45% of ur profits.

    in my head i was viewing 50% of action meaning the buyin and not the profit, i think everyone is viewing 50% of action meaning 50% of profit and buyin is seperate
    Edited By: okse54 Aug 8th, 2010 at 07:03 PM
     
  17.  
    Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post

    last time i looked most $100 tourneys have a larger prizepool, yet fewer people to wade through than a $50 mtt

    also, most people don't sell action for $100 mtts, and more do it for tourneys that are big, like let's say 1ks or like live shit like 10ks where first is a lot

    Gags.. I was just using the $100 as an example for easy math. With out mark up I was just looking for the basic formula.

    My thoughts were the player plays for 50% just like any staking deal and the other 50% is used for shares bought.. so 50% bought would actually be 25% for the buyer.
    Thread Starter
  18.  
    Originally Posted by boondock11 View Post

    Gags.. I was just using the $100 as an example for easy math. With out mark up I was just looking for the basic formula.

    My thoughts were the player plays for 50% just like any staking deal and the other 50% is used for shares bought.. so 50% bought would actually be 25% for the buyer.

    ok let me say this again...if you're playing in a $100 tournament...and i give you $50 toward your buy in, i would expect 50% of your action

    /thread
  19.  
    Originally Posted by okse54 View Post

    generally the standard is to pay the staker 50% of the equity that hes buying after stakeback,

    so in ur case since the staker is putting up 50% of the buyin he would be entitled to 25% of the profits

    so if u cashed for $200 ud pay him back his original $50, and then out of the $100 profit ud pay him $25 so hed get $75 total

    but obviously any stake can have any type of rules, its all about what the staker and player agree on.

    This just sounds REALLY wrong imo.

    If I buy 50% of someone, i expect to get 50% of the profits.
  20.  
    Originally Posted by ApesAreFun View Post

    This just sounds REALLY wrong imo.

    If I buy 50% of someone, i expect to get 50% of the profits.

    Apes - this is normally true if you just doing it for a tourney or two and there is no make-up.. Once you involve make-up, I tend to agree with Okse.. it really just depends on what kind of deal is going on..
  21. sort of off topic, but just be sure you dont sell 110+% of your shares and then TID and owe money, story of this happening a few years ago.
  22.  
    Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post

    ok let me say this again...if you're playing in a $100 tournament...and i give you $50 toward your buy in, i would expect 50% of your action

    /thread

    so if u gave someone $100 for their $100 buyin (which i think a large portion of stakes are for the whole buyin), do u expect 100% of the profits?
     
  23.  
    Originally Posted by okse54 View Post

    so if u gave someone $100 for their $100 buyin (which i think a large portion of stakes are for the whole buyin), do u expect 100% of the profits?

    well obv not. like someone said earlier the types of stakes that cover the whole buy-in are usually long-term agreements that involve make-up.

    people sell shares to mitigate their financial risk. it's usually a one-time thing where the player wants to play something that is over their comfort level (for example ,me in the 3.5k WPT event coming up). gags is 100% right on the way these work, the investor gets the % of profit that he/she invested of the total buy-in. Sometimes the seller can charge a small mark-up (it usually seems to be 10-20%) to sweeten the deal for them - since they are the ones actually playing.
    1 
  24. buying 50% of a 10k at zero MARKUP you would recieve 50% of the action would cost you 5k. Most ppl doing 1 time stakes with NO MAKEUP will usually charge MARKUP in the 1:1-1:3-1 range

    which is 5kx1.1-1.3 and would still recieve 50% of the action
     
  25. okse u are pretty far off in this thread.

    If you buy 50% of someone you have 50% of what they cash for.
  26.  
    Originally Posted by okse54 View Post

    so if u gave someone $100 for their $100 buyin (which i think a large portion of stakes are for the whole buyin), do u expect 100% of the profits?


    if i was backing someone for one touranment and one tournament only they would clearly need SOME incentive to play well. taking 100% of their profits seems a little over the top..but asking for 70-90% of their profits is not out of the ordinary
  27.  
    Originally Posted by byoonz View Post

    am i thinking about mark up incorrectly? if you buy 50% of me in a $1K with 10% markup, you pay me $550 but you still have 50% of my action

    This is correct
     
  28.  
    Originally Posted by Gags30 View Post

    if i was backing someone for one touranment and one tournament only they would clearly need SOME incentive to play well. taking 100% of their profits seems a little over the top..but asking for 70-90% of their profits is not out of the ordinary

    yep, it's actually fairly common on the Other site and chipmeup.com
     

Similar Threads