[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Case set up Poker stars Micro-buy-in $1.10 to $4.40 MT-SNG: I'm not the player called HERO. I do see this quite often in MT-SNGs. I think the limp FTA is questionable to begin. I don't think AKo is strong enough to trap-limp with.
Seat 1: (2750 in chips)
Seat 2: (1210 in chips)
Seat 3: (2000 in chips)
Seat 4: HERO (2150 in chips)
Seat 5: (1600 in chips)
Seat 6: (1700 in chips)
Seat 7: (1200 in chips)
Seat 9: (2100 in chips)
Seat 2: posts small blind 25
Seat 3: posts big blind 50
Dealt to HERO AsKd
Seat 4: HERO calls 50
Seat 5: folds
Seat 6: folds
Seat 7: folds
Seat 9: calls 50
Seat 1: raises 2700 to 2750 and is all-in
xxxxx: folds
xxxxx: folds
Seat 4: HERO calls 2100 and is all-in
Seat 9: folds
Uncalled bet (580) returned to Seat 1:
I asked this question, because I'm curious. We are slightly ahead or slightly behind and with a very playable stack 42bb after we limp FTA. Is there a training site or forum/blog that says "Never fold AKo" early in a tournament (level-4).
We are usually not in the lead when we call versus a ppl with a pair and you will only connect with the board 25% to 40% of the time.
I think that it's rather insane to call-off 42bb at level-4 with under 25 minutes into the MT-SNG. How deep do you have to be to consider folding in this situation, if you think this is an auto-call (snap) here?
Poker stove hand range scenarios as follows:
Best case scenarioVery loose villan
HERO: 54.317% { AKo }
villan..: 45.683% { 22+, ATs+, KTs+, QTs+, AJo+, KQo }
Average case scenario average villan
HERO: 52.448% { AKo }
villan.: 47.552% { 99+, AJs+, KJs+, QJs, AQo+ }
Worst case scenario Tight villan
HERO: 43.135% { AKo }
villan.: 56.865% { 99+, AQs+, AKo } -
it's possible to fold AK preflop? my screen doesn't even come up with a fold button when i get it...
-
In a $1-$4 MTT, how many ppl shoving there do you think fit your "very tight" villain category?
In all other instances, you're like 52%+ against villain's range...so unless you have a "very tight" read on villain, you have a +EV call. Every now and again he'll have Aces or Kings and you'll be unhappy, sometimes you'll have a flip, sometimes he'll have AQ, AJ, or A2 and you're happy, sometimes he's got J4o and he's shoving because he's realized he's gotta go take a dump.
Unless you have a read...call. I'm not Phil Ivey, but that's my opinion anyways.
Blue -
AK has too call there IMO. As said before it is only bad if he has AA or KK.....and shoving AA or KK would be terrible so I doubt he has that. If he has AA or KK 95% they are just standard raising for value so call against what is most like a bad Ax or mid pair.
-
I don't think limping then folding to a shove is optimal here. I think the "average case scenario" is somewhat reasonable, with a few tilt shoves thrown into his range.
-
What is their reason for limping with AK? If they are going to fold to some maniac who shoves 2700 to pick up 175 in the middle, why limp on the first place? I am never playing this hand this way, but if did, it would be to get my chips in the middle preflop in this type of a situation. You need to build a stack in these micro mtt's so the is a good opportunity to do so. Most times you are flipping or ahead of his range.
-
The devil has been listening:
Here is an article that explains the math of getting it all-in with AKo earliy in a tournament. The chance to double up and expected win rates.
To Flip or Not to Flip
If that's the case, shouldn't we push all-in everytime we get AK and we have action in front of our decision?
Exploiting small edges -
" You need to estimate, then, the expected value (EV) of your brand-new $20,000 stack size at a later point in the tournament - the hypothetical point at which you'd eventually double up after declining the "coin flip." Let's reasonably (conservatively, actually) say that when you double up right away, your stack will be worth $22,000 at that hypothetical future point at which you would've found your better spot.
It's time to do the math. If taking the "coin flip" gives you a 53.8 percent chance to have a stack of $22,000 later in the tournament, how likely do you have to be to double up later in order to fold your pocket queens? Well, you can answer that by solving this equation: x(20,000) = (.538)(22,000).
Do the algebra and you get x = .5918, or 59.18 percent. So, do you think you're good enough to have a 59.18 percent chance of doubling up later on? If you said yes, you're wrong. Go back to our thought experiment. If you could consistently have a 59.18 percent chance of doubling up, you'd win a 1,024-player tournament more than five times as often as an average player. Trust me, you're not that good. I don't think it's possible to be that good. I'm certainly not that good."
this is so dumb -
Personally I think your "Best case" and "Average" are incorrect from my experience. I feel that you could go down to A2o when talking about the 1.10 - 4.40. I think in a turbo sng or turbo mtt I would call every time....actually if I were to limp with AKo I would call every time in any blind structure.
Similar Threads
- 52 Replies
- 11 Replies
- 11 Replies
-
4 Replies
Calling all in when you know you are behind
By SerlinSteak19 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jul 30th, 2006, 11:51 PM









