Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Dear Pokerstars

Reply to Thread
  1. stealthmunk stealthmunk is offline

    Orange, CT
    United States

    Posts: 460
    Joined: May 05

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 4:59am)

    Step 1: Change the affectionate stuper to a 200+15 (Special Gizmo Who cares what you call it Make it something donks would like)
    Step 2: Slap a guarantee on it. 100k to start looks cool, and you'd definitely meet itevery night.
    Step 3: Run sattelites to it.
    Step 4: Watch it get 1000+people everynight.

    Oh ye, make the antes bigger and give us 2500 chips too.

    That is all.
    I'd email them but I'm too lazy.
  2. darkcheck_ darkcheck_ is offline

    Costa Rica

    Posts: 5,007
    Joined: Jan 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 5:01am) in reply to stealthmunk

    special name and a blue label or somethin would be good, draw more attention to it, since its distinguished as the party supers were etc.
     
  3. Diggity D Diggity D is offline

    Chicago, IL
    United States

    Posts: 4,314
    Joined: Apr 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 5:14am) in reply to darkcheck_

    agree
  4. MrTimCaum MrTimCaum is offline

    Dublin
    Ireland

    Posts: 1,920
    Joined: Aug 05

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 6:05am) in reply to stealthmunk

    I've been whining about the lack of satellites and the need for 2500 chips for months on end, but I doubt these things are ever going to happen. :(
  5. acecatcher26 acecatcher26 is offline

    AR
    United States

    Posts: 4,351
    Joined: Jan 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 8:49am) in reply to MrTimCaum

    I think it should stay at $162 same as the super on party.... On another note..
    http://www.pocketfives.com/DA196906-...C869DE6D4.aspx
  6. brsavage brsavage is offline Spontaneous Benefactor

    Denham Springs, LA
    United States

    Posts: 2,877
    Joined: Jan 05

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 9:04am) in reply to stealthmunk

    It definitely needs more chips to start, minimum 2500.
     1
  7. acecatcher26 acecatcher26 is offline

    AR
    United States

    Posts: 4,351
    Joined: Jan 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 3:57pm) in reply to brsavage

    Y cant they just give all their tourneys, a better structure to allow more play. I mean what would it hurt??
  8. Anbessa Anbessa is offline

    CA
    United States

    Posts: 2,582
    Joined: Oct 05

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 4:04pm) in reply to acecatcher26

    PLZ PLZ PLZ 2500 CHIPS!!!

    just give a shot lee, im sure you will be happy with the results (ie turnout)

    bigger antes and 20 min levels would also be generous....please pick up where party left off, they had a very successfull tourney every night, because they gave the players what they wanted....heck charge 1 more $ in juice if you have to, just please off your players the value they deserver
    1
  9. Gila_M0nster Gila_M0nster is offline

    Loveland, CO
    United States

    Posts: 50
    Joined: Jul 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 4:49pm) in reply to Anbessa

    2500 in chips please
  10. delete9 delete9 is offline

    Saint Paul, MN
    United States

    Posts: 235
    Joined: Jan 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 4:56pm) in reply to Gila_M0nster

    No doubt party had 5k starting chips, bigger blinds tho too. 5$ MTT has same starting chips as the 162$= not right. I think all the 100$+ tourneys on stars should have more starting chips/ better structure. Everyother site has done it, we should be allowed more play in higher price tournaments imo.
  11. Damage1 Damage1 is offline

    Pittsburgh, PA
    United States

    Posts: 2,954
    Joined: Apr 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 4:59pm) in reply to delete9

    all tourneys should have a better structure, not just the $100+ ones, i think the 2500 starting stack w/ antes 1/10th the BB would be perfect, including 150/300 level
  12. delete9 delete9 is offline

    Saint Paul, MN
    United States

    Posts: 235
    Joined: Jan 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 5:30pm) in reply to Damage1

    obv they all should,but epecially the 100$+. Oh yeah and add a rebuy glitch since party is gone.
  13. Trent55 Trent55 is offline can i have a title now

    Posts: 8,510
    Joined: Oct 05

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 5:44pm) in reply to delete9

    2500 chips please
  14. dlperrio dlperrio is offline

    Columbia City, IN
    United States

    Posts: 315
    Joined: Nov 05

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 6:01pm) in reply to Trent55

    I love double stacked mtts!
     
  15. Dumb Walrus Dumb Walrus is offline

    S Lake Tahoe, CA
    United States

    Posts: 16,512
    Joined: Jan 05

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 6:06pm) in reply to Trent55

    "$5+.50 MTT has the same amount of chips as the $150+12, not right."

    The only thing that is NOT right, is how you are going to screw the $5 players just because they arent playing in nightly larger buy ins. Just because it is a $5 tourney doesnt mean it should be an ALL-IN Fest for a couple of hours. It is NOT right to discriminate against small buy in players.
  16. amak316 amak316 is offline

    Posts: 2,823
    Joined: Mar 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 6:21pm) in reply to Trent55

    10 million starting stacks, blinds start at .50/1, 2hr levels, whoever lives longer wins.

    count it
     
  17. Don_Keehaawtee Don_Keehaawtee is offline

    Houston, TX
    United States

    Posts: 18
    Joined: Jun 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 6:25pm) in reply to acecatcher26

    Y cant they just give all their tourneys, a better structure to allow more play. I mean what would it hurt??
    Donkey's Advo...I mean Devil's Advocate - Why would they want to have the tourneys last longer when it is more profitable for them to see players busting out early so they can go jump on another tourney and continue to collect more in rakes than a 2500 chip tourney would allow?
  18. JeffreyRGarza JeffreyRGarza is offline

    Ithaca, NY
    United States

    Posts: 50
    Joined: May 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 6:35pm) in reply to Don_Keehaawtee

    Dear pokerstars,

    do what Stealthmunk says.

    ALSO,

    please add at least one bigger buy in daily tournament starting between 5 and 7pm.

    thanks,

    -Jeff
  19. warden warden is offline

    Tucson, AZ
    United States

    Posts: 15,532
    Joined: Apr 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 6:37pm) in reply to Damage1

    I think antes 1/10 the SB is too small, 1/4-1/6 would be best imo.
     2
  20. Plattsburgh Plattsburgh is offline

    Red Hook, NY
    United States

    Posts: 3,371
    Joined: Aug 05

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 6:38pm) in reply to JeffreyRGarza

    DEAR stars, 2500 CHIPS, SAME STRUCTURE

    if you dont do it... the terrorists win.
     
  21. Damage1 Damage1 is offline

    Pittsburgh, PA
    United States

    Posts: 2,954
    Joined: Apr 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 6:38pm) in reply to warden

    right now the antes for the new structure is 1/10 the SMALL blind i.e. 400/800/40, doubling the antes to 80 in that case adds nearly a small blind more to every pot
  22. AJKHoosier1 AJKHoosier1 is offline

    Los Angeles, CA
    United States

    Posts: 2,589
    Joined: Jul 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 6:41pm) in reply to JeffreyRGarza

    I'm with Jeff,

    if stars ran a $300-$500 nightly, I might actually start playing mtts again... and its not like the turnout wouldnt make it worth it for them
    131
  23. amak316 amak316 is offline

    Posts: 2,823
    Joined: Mar 06

    Oct 17th, 2006 (10/17/2006 6:49pm) in reply to AJKHoosier1

    i agree on all counts we need more chips in the stuper, we need more big buyins, i miss dise and party because now i have like no tourneys to play, i dont want to have to go back to playing 5r and 10r lol
     
  24. mordan mordan is offline

    NC
    United States

    Posts: 3,809
    Joined: Jul 05

    Oct 19th, 2006 (10/19/2006 1:43am) in reply to amak316

    agree with jeff and AJK....nightly 300 would flat own....and dumb walrus...u get what u pay for...u pay 5 dollars u get a short stak....u pay 162 u should get 2500....thatz how the world works....plzzzz 2500 chips starz

    Mordan
     
  25. rdog rdog is offline

    Posts: 177
    Joined: Jun 06

    Oct 19th, 2006 (10/19/2006 1:49am) in reply to stealthmunk

    Agree with everything said. Bigger buy ins should get more chips (at least the 162) and there needs to be another big buy in either before the 162 or in between the 162 and the 109. Also, get rid of the PL 109 because it doesn't get enough players. Can we get Below to send Lee an email?
  26. ratsauce89 ratsauce89 is offline

    San Lucas
    Mexico

    Posts: 1,069
    Joined: Jun 06

    Oct 19th, 2006 (10/19/2006 2:12am) in reply to rdog

    why stop at 2500 chips?
    why not ask start higher? 5000?
    641 
  27. Anbessa Anbessa is offline

    CA
    United States

    Posts: 2,582
    Joined: Oct 05

    Oct 19th, 2006 (10/19/2006 2:19am) in reply to ratsauce89

    this is only like the 20th thread asking stars to improve the structurefor the nightly 150$ tourney...seems to me that if they dont do it, it might really be a sign that they dont care what their customer base wants (in this matter).....i can understand if they ran a trial and the attendance went down...but really its not gonna do that, it will instead go through the roof
    1
  28. Jovial Gent Jovial Gent is offline

    Seattle, WA
    United States

    Posts: 1,354
    Joined: Jun 05

    Oct 19th, 2006 (10/19/2006 3:00am) in reply to stealthmunk

    Agree 100%!
     11
Reply to Thread

Similar Threads