Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Did i made a mistake here?

Reply to Thread
  1. Pojai Pojai is offline

    Richmond
    Canada

    Posts: 22
    Joined: Nov 06

    Dec 26th, 2007 (12/26/2007 7:58am)

    pokerstars Game #14106275724: Tournament #71071252, $30+$3 Hold'em No Limit - Level VII (150/300) - 2007/12/26 - 07:41:46 (ET)
    Table '71071252 22' 9-max Seat #4 is the button
    Seat 1: Rainy Equity (3677 in chips)
    Seat 2: Clermonts (11414 in chips)
    Seat 3: Pojai (6475 in chips)
    Seat 4: cquiroga (13375 in chips)
    Seat 5: Anaspain (6255 in chips)
    Seat 6: BARBY7211 (9745 in chips)
    Seat 7: nbanker (12840 in chips)
    Rainy Equity: posts the ante 25
    Clermonts: posts the ante 25
    Pojai: posts the ante 25
    cquiroga: posts the ante 25
    Anaspain: posts the ante 25
    BARBY7211: posts the ante 25
    nbanker: posts the ante 25
    Anaspain: posts small blind 150
    BARBY7211: posts big blind 300
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to Pojai [5h 5c]
    nbanker: folds
    Rainy Equity: raises 600 to 900
    Clermonts: folds
    Count vonR is connected
    Pojai: raises 5550 to 6450 and is all-in
    cquiroga: folds
    Anaspain: folds
    BARBY7211: folds
    Rainy Equity: calls 2752 and is all-in
    *** FLOP *** [3h 2s Tc]
    *** TURN *** [3h 2s Tc] [Jh]
    *** RIVER *** [3h 2s Tc Jh] [Js]
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    Rainy Equity: shows [Qd Ac] (a pair of Jacks)
    Pojai: shows [5h 5c] (two pair, Jacks and Fives)
    Pojai collected 7929 from pot
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 7929 | Rake 0
    Board [3h 2s Tc Jh Js]
    Seat 1: Rainy Equity showed [Qd Ac] and lost with a pair of Jacks
    Seat 2: Clermonts folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 3: Pojai showed [5h 5c] and won (7929) with two pair, Jacks and Fives
    Seat 4: cquiroga (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 5: Anaspain (small blind) folded before Flop
    Seat 6: BARBY7211 (big blind) folded before Flop
    Seat 7: nbanker folded before Flop (didn't bet)

    I think i have some sort of fold equity here because some weak players tend to raise n fold to shove leaving themselves with 10 BB. But I still think i made a mistake here. Anyone?
     
  2. shanetrain22 shanetrain22 is offline

    Posts: 5,179
    Joined: Oct 06

    Dec 26th, 2007 (12/26/2007 9:57am) in reply to Pojai

    EP raises 1/4 of his stack and there isn't as much FE here as you might think. Few players are folding here and you're praying to god for a flip. In general this isn't standard, but fairly player dependent nonetheless.
     1
  3. ChuckSty ChuckSty is offline

    Durham, NC
    United States

    Posts: 2,358
    Joined: Oct 05

    Dec 26th, 2007 (12/26/2007 10:08am) in reply to shanetrain22

    I think on one hand your reraise of an ep shortstack is goign to look superstrong but on the otherhand i'd say 75%+ the guy isn't raiseing 1/4 of his stack and folding to a repop. As far as handranges are concerned i think it is totally player dependant. But against alot of guys aq is going to play like ass, but against other players i think it's a safe ship.
     1
  4. Pojai Pojai is offline

    Richmond
    Canada

    Posts: 22
    Joined: Nov 06

    Dec 26th, 2007 (12/26/2007 10:29am) in reply to Pojai

    The table is 7 handed, it is more like a MP raise
     
    Thread Starter
  5. Jennifear Jennifear is offline

    Niagara Falls, NY
    United States

    Posts: 10,222
    Joined: Nov 05

    Dec 26th, 2007 (12/26/2007 11:06am) in reply to Pojai

    You did make a mistake here unless you had seen him twice raise/fold with less than 15 BBs.
  6. bhagen7 bhagen7 is offline

    Madison, WI
    United States

    Posts: 928
    Joined: Feb 06

    Dec 26th, 2007 (12/26/2007 11:34am) in reply to Jennifear

    yes you made a huge mistake "Did i made a mistake here?" it should be "Did i make a mistake here?" that would be your mistake
Reply to Thread