Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
I am watchin poker after dark and doyle was sayin he thinks hes played more hands than durrrr but raptor and gabe kaplan said noway durrr has played more what do u guys think??
-
Doyle does have a 50 year head start.
-
durrrrrrrr and its not even close
-
-
Pretty sure durrrr crossed the milli mark like 2 years ago but w/e
Durrrr's definitely played more hands and it really can't possibly be close -
I"m kind of getting sick of doyle always talking about how he has played more hands than anyone
I don't think he realizes HOW many hands he'd have to play live in order to keep up with an online pro...
even if durrrrrrrrr only played 1000 hands an hour.... which he probably gets in more... and he only played 40 hours a week... which he probably plays more .... that maneas he plays 40,000 a week
that would only take him 25 weeks to reach 1 million hands.....
Doyle plays live and probably 35 hands an hour at a fast table...assuming 40 hours a week that would take doyle 714 weeks to play 1 million hands
so as someone said before... it can't even possibly be close... -
Does Doyle multi table on his site?
-
For argument's sake....
If you were to ignore all hands folded pre-flop/ sat out (which I know you shouldn't) and only consider hands the player has actively participated in, this would probably improve Doyle's claim.
I still think Doyle doesn't appreciate the huge volume some of these online pros put in. There will be some, Derek8, Shaundeeb etc. who will dwarf Durrrr's numbers. -
<TABLE width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD>durrrr</TD><TD class=green>$3.269.669,04 </TD><TD class=gray>4395</TD><TD class=gray>416482</TD><TD class=gray>9380,25</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Thats according to highstakes not sure how accurate but its from 01-01-2007 til now -
thats just from ftp and they only just started tracking all games
-
There already is, they're called mid stakes grinders.
Originally Posted by KingMonty
For argument's sake....
If you were to ignore all hands folded pre-flop/ sat out (which I know you shouldn't) and only consider hands the player has actively participated in, this would probably improve Doyle's claim.
I still think Doyle doesn't appreciate the huge volume some of these online pros put in. There will be some, Derek8, Shaundeeb etc. who will dwarf Durrrr's numbers. -
and it would make more sense that somebody that multis 20 tables for 30-40hrs a week would easily have doyles numbers crushed in a year or so. doyle prolly plays 20-30hands an hour live. even if he averaged 25hands an hour for 40hrs a week for 50 years...... thats only 2.6mil hands.......and he prolly hasn't played that many. online grinders... 60hands an hour 20tables 40hrs or 1 year............2.496mill. in just one year.
-
The only thing with this is can the dudes nut hunting 24 tabling actually play good poker in cash/mtts? Cuz it's different when ur just playing AA and KK to make profit. Not saying those 24 table grinders are bad, just food for thought.
Originally Posted by pharreal87
and it would make more sense that somebody that multis 20 tables for 30-40hrs a week would easily have doyles numbers crushed in a year or so. doyle prolly plays 20-30hands an hour live. even if he averaged 25hands an hour for 40hrs a week for 50 years...... thats only 2.6mil hands.......and he prolly hasn't played that many. online grinders... 60hands an hour 20tables 40hrs or 1 year............2.496mill. in just one year.
-
durrr will play 12+ tables of 200/400 if there are enough games running, he cannot play with competition this good and win while only nut hunting. also, if you want to consider "good poker" then you should probably take into account the fact that durrr is the laggiest player of all time and makes great bluffs, thin value bets and big folds all at the right times.
Originally Posted by bef99hwk
The only thing with this is can the dudes nut hunting 24 tabling actually play good poker in cash/mtts? Cuz it's different when ur just playing AA and KK to make profit. Not saying those 24 table grinders are bad, just food for thought.Originally Posted by pharreal87
and it would make more sense that somebody that multis 20 tables for 30-40hrs a week would easily have doyles numbers crushed in a year or so. doyle prolly plays 20-30hands an hour live. even if he averaged 25hands an hour for 40hrs a week for 50 years...... thats only 2.6mil hands.......and he prolly hasn't played that many. online grinders... 60hands an hour 20tables 40hrs or 1 year............2.496mill. in just one year.
the figures that everyone seems to be using to calculate durrr's number of hands are way off, he is never 20 tabling for 40 hours a week. however durrr would still have played far more hands even having only played 12 tables like 20 hours a week on average over his career. -
Lets say doyle played 50 hands and hr and played 8 hrs per day. Thats 400 hands per day @ 300 days per year that is 120k * 50 = 7,000,000. fwiw i have no idea how many hands per hr are dealt live, but I think 400 hands per day on avg would be about right for doyle as i'm sure he had much longer sessions at times.
-
durrrr is about to play 150k hands in the next 3-4 months just in his challenge. It would probably take doyle 3 years to see that in his prime, nowadays who knows how long.
-
No way 50 hands an hour is ever possible in the live games doyle plays. Cut those numbers in half at least.
Originally Posted by ronkend
Lets say doyle played 50 hands and hr and played 8 hrs per day. Thats 400 hands per day @ 300 days per year that is 120k * 50 = 7,000,000. fwiw i have no idea how many hands per hr are dealt live, but I think 400 hands per day on avg would be about right for doyle as i'm sure he had much longer sessions at times.
-
lets get this out of the way first, durrr has probably played more then 7million hands. keep in mind that he grinded his way up through the limits to get where he is, over the last 4.5-5 years.
Originally Posted by ronkend
Lets say doyle played 50 hands and hr and played 8 hrs per day. Thats 400 hands per day @ 300 days per year that is 120k * 50 = 7,000,000. fwiw i have no idea how many hands per hr are dealt live, but I think 400 hands per day on avg would be about right for doyle as i'm sure he had much longer sessions at times.
second, there is no way doyle has averages 8 hours/day over the past 50 years. maybe at first he played long hours on most days, but like everyone else, i am sure he has trailed off a bit. -
its nowhere near online. it takes the dealer like a min just to shuffle.
Originally Posted by ronkend
Lets say doyle played 50 hands and hr and played 8 hrs per day. Thats 400 hands per day @ 300 days per year that is 120k * 50 = 7,000,000. fwiw i have no idea how many hands per hr are dealt live, but I think 400 hands per day on avg would be about right for doyle as i'm sure he had much longer sessions at times.
-
uhh. I actually laughed when i read that ..... I love people who have input but yet NO idea what they are talking about. WP
Originally Posted by brianl28
Does not really matter, what matters is that Doyle has been winning for 50 years. Let's see where Durrrr is after he has played for more than a year or so.
And my Guess is Durrrr has played more hands ...... as in actually been involved in the action....as far has hands seen/watched played......50 years is a long time. -
can sum1 plz tell me the last time durrr 12 tabled anything???? wasnt that back when he grinded 5/10....4-6tbls max nowadays
Originally Posted by greggo430
durrr will play 12+ tables of 200/400 if there are enough games running, he cannot play with competition this good and win while only nut hunting. also, if you want to consider "good poker" then you should probably take into account the fact that durrr is the laggiest player of all time and makes great bluffs, thin value bets and big folds all at the right times.Originally Posted by bef99hwk
The only thing with this is can the dudes nut hunting 24 tabling actually play good poker in cash/mtts? Cuz it's different when ur just playing AA and KK to make profit. Not saying those 24 table grinders are bad, just food for thought.Originally Posted by pharreal87
and it would make more sense that somebody that multis 20 tables for 30-40hrs a week would easily have doyles numbers crushed in a year or so. doyle prolly plays 20-30hands an hour live. even if he averaged 25hands an hour for 40hrs a week for 50 years...... thats only 2.6mil hands.......and he prolly hasn't played that many. online grinders... 60hands an hour 20tables 40hrs or 1 year............2.496mill. in just one year.
the figures that everyone seems to be using to calculate durrr's number of hands are way off, he is never 20 tabling for 40 hours a week. however durrr would still have played far more hands even having only played 12 tables like 20 hours a week on average over his career.









