Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Full Tilt Poker Game #24155143990: $15,000 Guarantee (Rebuy) (186651333), Table 17 - 250/500 Ante 50 - No Limit Hold'em - 01:13:05 ET - 2010/09/24
Edited By: Oo DISCO oO Sep 24th, 2010 at 06:32 AM
Seat 1: rhyyno45 (15,805)
Seat 2: RooRz (14,986)
Seat 3: Dave75 (14,623)
Seat 4: Tee Crow (32,828)
Seat 5: wejo (36,509)
Seat 6: kmksmkn (15,721)
Seat 7: tstubbs313 (7,492)
Seat 8: Oo DiScO oO (16,405)
Seat 9: OOTHEGIFTOO (9,839)
rhyyno45 antes 50
RooRz antes 50
Dave75 antes 50
Tee Crow antes 50
wejo antes 50
kmksmkn antes 50
tstubbs313 antes 50
Oo DiScO oO antes 50
OOTHEGIFTOO antes 50
tstubbs313 posts the small blind of 250
Oo DiScO oO posts the big blind of 500
The button is in seat #6
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Oo DiScO oO [Qh Ah]
OOTHEGIFTOO folds
rhyyno45 folds
RooRz folds
Dave75 folds
Tee Crow raises to 1,500
wejo calls 1,500
kmksmkn folds
tstubbs313 folds
Oo DiScO oO has 15 seconds left to act
Oo DiScO oO raises to 5,050
opener isnt a nit but hasnt been out of line, everyone has been playing pretty ABC, id seen wejo flat a couple opens before so this didnt alarm me at all. just wanted to check up see peoples inputs in spots like this, because this is pretty much my standard play here... any1 playing this differently at all? this is the nighttime 10r on FTP btw. -
so he had AK, and you lost?
-
no, he didnt have AK, and the results are irrelevant anyways, wanna stop being a tool and give some input?
-
I don't think 5k was a big enough raise personally. I would have probably raised 5k on top somewhere in the 6.5k-6.8k range. I guess if your reraised there, you can make your decision pretty easily given the history you have.
-
i personally feel that the sizing difference there doesnt really matter as ur highly unlikely to get flatted, and if i do its not too rough of a spot anyway- im slamming any flop having just a pot sized bet left. any1 else got anything? interested in hearing how people approach spots like these sitting on stack sizes similar to this. thank you tho chief.
-
As long as you know all the chips are going in then the squeeze is fine but I personally would shove it to make it look weaker. If the flop is bland people always put you on AQ/AK anyways so it's a standard call if you do shove and their 9-10 hit and they were pot-committed.
-
Originally Posted by ZenEnso
As long as you know all the chips are going in then the squeeze is fine but I personally would shove it to make it look weaker. If the flop is bland people always put you on AQ/AK anyways so it's a standard call if you do shove and their 9-10 hit and they were pot-committed.
I don't see why you would be wanting to look weaker, what are you hoping will call you, aj? i doubt that would happen since a shove here would look exactly like Ak/Aq. I think you would want to look as strong as possible to get him to lay down as many of his mid pairs as possible, so if a smaller raise to 5 or 6k looks stronger i'd say that's the best play.
nothing wrong with the way you played it in my opinion -
AQ/AK aren't hands I'm wild about playing OOP vs two opponents, and I don't like the idea of three-betting more than one-third of my stack when I'll miss the flop 70% of the time.
For these reasons, I much prefer the shove here. -
<3 200+ views and 5 replys. thanks to those who did.
-
Your sizing seems to big IMO, I'd make it 3900-4200ish to induce spazzes and flats from worse. And yea make sure u get it in on any flop
-
Your 3bet looks pretty strong which is what you're trying to accomplish. Probably will get folds a high % of the time. A little tricky since you're a bit too deep to 3bet shove. Your sizing is likely the best option, well played.
-
This looks A-ok to me. As you point out, you're unlikely to get flatted but sometimes in the smaller buy-in stuff I play I will just shove this pre because people are more than happy to flat here and if you whiff the flop, which you will 2/3 the time, you're in a messy spot. WP, nh etc.
-
Not this, you want the guy to forfeit his equity of the pot and you collect the dead money. Even an spazz hand has decent equity against you. And you dont want to be flatted neither as you will have to shove almost every flop unless you flop gin.
Edited By: el arracachero Sep 24th, 2010 at 04:38 PM -
Edited By: Steve Murkle Sep 24th, 2010 at 06:57 PMLook at it like this: If you think that all the hands that are gonna flat or re-shove that you are beating will still flat or reshove if you make it 5.5k (instead of 4k )... Than 5.5k is fine.Originally Posted by el arracachero
Not this, you want the guy to forfeit his equity of the pot and you collect the dead money. Even an spazz hand has decent equity against you. And you dont want to be flatted neither as you will have to shove almost every flop unless you flop gin.
Otherwise, you want to induce worse hands to reshove (and even flat) in order to get the most value from the hands you beat. You do not want to fold out hands that you beat which are willing to put more chips in because you are scared of getting sucked out. It happens. The most +EV play is to get worse hands to give you as much value as possible when they normally wouldnt.
I think in order to accomplish this you can lower your sizing as long as you plan on getting it in verse their whole range on all flops.
Also, think about it like this: If you have AA here instead of AQhh, do you still make it 5.5k? If you make it 5.5k lets say 66% of the time they both fold and you earn 3750. The other 33% of the time you get flatted by 1 or 2 people and reshoved on a smaller %. You've now earned an extra 5.5k yes, but they are going to fold a decent % of flops, and shove the other %. If you make it 4k with aces you are going to get flatted or reshoved on a larger % of the time gaining extra value. Because even though its 4k instead of 5.5k you get called a higher % of the time which is a higher +EV. (without me doing math here). And now you still have a pot sized shove and you can check/shove or bet/call we and get value from them hitting top pair, 2nd pair, draws, etc, when they would have normally folded pre-flop. This gets you the most value out of AA in this situation. You should be playing AQhh the same way. Although it has less value than aces, its still most likely ahead of their ranges and plays like aces. You want full value from your top 3%. -
Edited By: ZenEnso Sep 24th, 2010 at 07:33 PMAgreed. I understand the comment in my earlier post about shoving pretty much screams AK/AQ but honestly if I had position to that small of a 3-bet I'm calling with suited connectors and sure as hell not folding low pairs. Pot odds with 50-60 BB stackOriginally Posted by hushpuckena
AQ/AK aren't hands I'm wild about playing OOP vs two opponents, and I don't like the idea of three-betting more than one-third of my stack when I'll miss the flop 70% of the time.
For these reasons, I much prefer the shove here.
It's all about table dynamics as well. Sometimes jamming is better sometimes small 3-bet sometimes larger. All abou the flow. -
Looks good to me but I'd elect to 3bet a bit more to about 6215 so you have a little less than a psb to jam any flop if you're flatted.
-
Depends on the quality of the other players. Against good players I like a smaller 3b then call. If one of them decides to be a hoodlum and flat, I like a valueish bet/call on any flop. I like shoving a Q high flop against a good player every now and again too. Against bad players, I don't think it matters too much. AQ has a ton of value here and we're pretty much deciding that we're going with it. I usually just mess around in spots like this and raise to 9k or something. If I'm bored I'll raise it to like 3600 and try to get some extra in the pot before I shut it down, in the hope that we can flop dominating and bust someone, or they miss the flop and fold because we look so strong; obviously this line risks busting out to weird/terrible flats a lot more. Lots of options, none of them are actually bad because of hand strength. Even flatting isn't bad because of the chance of getting someone's full stack just for flopping top pair. Seriously, there's so few ways to butcher this spot.
-
Raise to 5500...... Jam any flop.... turn ace river Q.... collect chipsamortis =) I think just setting up yourself for a shove on any flop is gonna be your best play. SInce it is the late night 11r donkament, I imagine theres a lot of donks that will superflat here if your reraise is too small... and you're probably just gonna hate yourself when you see the JTo on the T63 board.... OWWIN!
Edited By: TigerRam Sep 24th, 2010 at 07:53 PM -
tyty for all the responses. ramses back from the dead tho.
-
BTW, I also like jamming anything in my shoving range with my stack size, to disguise my hand and get the donk calls from the flatter (especially at lower levels) with hands such as 77-99/AT-AJ, when I turn up with the monsters. Just luvs giving that little dose of Mr More!
Originally Posted by ZenEnso
Agreed. I understand the comment in my earlier post about shoving pretty much screams AK/AQ but honestly if I had position to that small of a 3-bet I'm calling with suited connectors and sure as hell not folding low pairs. Pot odds with 50-60 BB stack
It's all about table dynamics as well. Sometimes jamming is better sometimes small 3-bet sometimes larger. All abou the flow.
Also, I agree with your remarks re players putting you on AQ/AK on a dry board. If I had a dollar for every time I've seen someone go for all of it in a raised pot on a board of T63 rainbow, cos they never give credit to that possible overpair......................
Similar Threads
-
4 Replies
is this an alright squeeze spot??
By Jungcabar in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Oct 22nd, 2009, 10:53 PM -
4 Replies
Is this a good spot to squeeze?
By AlwaysImproving in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Sep 17th, 2009, 09:55 PM -
25 Replies
Interesting spot, squeeze or just let it go
By AAeveryhand in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Aug 21st, 2008, 02:51 AM - 3 Replies
-
2 Replies
Is this a bad spot to squeeze?
By Drinking Buddy in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jan 18th, 2008, 02:59 PM










