Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. 90 man

    Full Tilt Poker Game #28233667410: $6 + $0.50 KO Sit & Go (219527117), Table 2 - 100/200 - No Limit Hold'em - 18:10:30 ET - 2011/02/15
    Seat 1: earwig (810)
    Seat 2: hainesAKQJ10 (3,815)
    Seat 3: carpecouch (5,925)
    Seat 5: 61Memo61 (15,285)
    Seat 6: junkyarddogII (4,497)
    Seat 7: devinmcd11 (7,575)
    Seat 8: fifithecat (3,725)
    Seat 9: BUCK1971 (3,545)
    junkyarddogII posts the small blind of 100
    devinmcd11 posts the big blind of 200
    The button is in seat #5
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to devinmcd11 [7s 7h]
    fifithecat folds
    BUCK1971 folds
    earwig raises to 810, and is all in
    hainesAKQJ10 calls 810
    carpecouch folds
    61Memo61 calls 810
    junkyarddogII folds
    devinmcd11
  2. No
  3. why not
    Thread Starter
  4.  
    Originally Posted by devinmcd11 View Post

    why not

    1. Because your hand does not play well 3 or 4 way;
    2. Because your hand is a dog against top 15% hands (which are the type that would flat the initial bet and call your shove);
    3. Because your stack is the effective stack against 61memo61; and
    4. People don't fold anymore (particularly in 90s) once they put a chip in the pot, making all of the above issues relevant.

    I think if effective stacks were ~20bbs your play works just fine. Here I would probably call behind and hope for the best. You have direct odds to setmine and, while you might not have enough implied (I'm not sure; my math skills stink and I'm not sure what amount people are working with these days), it is less than 10% of your stack, you are relatively deep AND 61memo61 has you covered.
    Edited By: s.l. halper Feb 16th, 2011 at 12:05 AM
     

Similar Threads