Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. Just going through the book now.
    for those who read it, how important is to you, or do you think in terms of BB's and if so, when do you start shoving ATC when folded around to you?
  2. i only think in BBs, but you need to be aware of the effect antes are having on your stacks and others and how that should affect your aggressiveness. shoving ATC can be done in lots of situations, you're not going to get a definite answer.
  3. M def, you have to take antes into account. If you use BBs but adjust for antes then you are really just using M anyway.
    2
  4. Used to think in terms of M after I read it...then I asked Round42 what he does and he said BBs...so naturally I switched back to big blinds. I guess M is more important in big live tourneys when the antes are HUGE.
  5. I never understood the obsession with BB. It seems obvious to me that M is the right choice, am I missing something?

    Edit: because of the antes obviously..
    Edited By: StayCalm Jun 29th, 2010 at 02:35 AM
  6. k, so back to the original question, when do you start to panic and raise ATC all in?
    Thread Starter
  7.  
    Originally Posted by Stay_calm86 View Post

    I never understood the obsession with BB. It seems obvious to me that M is the right choice, am I missing something?

    Edit: because of the antes obviously..

    bc BBs are usually easier to calculate (especially live)

    and everything else other than shove/fold is usually determined by BBs like 3betting/4betting, bet sizing and stuff like that

     
    Originally Posted by 56off56 View Post

    k, so back to the original question, when do you start to panic and raise ATC all in?

    to vague a question
     
  8.  
    Originally Posted by 56off56 View Post

    k, so back to the original question, when do you start to panic and raise ATC all in?

    Never panic.

    As a general rule I shove 10-12 BBs without antes and 15 BBs with antes.

    Many situations arise though where I won't stick to that.
  9. http://www.pocketfives.com/blogs/roc...points-568083/ check out my blog on M theory bro..Hope this helps
  10. It only depends on how strong you hands are, if you have 2-3 off suit, even on the BB, you should throw your hand in as even hitting a pair you will still probably lose whether you have nothing to hit a set or a straight
  11. M gives a more accurate picture, no good reason not to use it. Yes it's a bit harder to calculate live but honestly if you can't multiply the ante by the number of players in your head you need to work on your mental math skills. It's no harder than calculating pot odds or anything else.
  12. 1000/2000/250

    pot=5250

    chip stack: 25000

    harrington advices shoving with an M of 5 or less.
  13.  
    Originally Posted by 56off56 View Post

    k, so back to the original question, when do you start to panic and raise ATC all in?

    Poker is not this simple.
     
  14.  
    Originally Posted by trevor grady View Post

    It only depends on how strong you hands are, if you have 2-3 off suit, even on the BB, you should throw your hand in as even hitting a pair you will still probably lose whether you have nothing to hit a set or a straight

    this sure is a gem
  15.  
    Originally Posted by tmac2424 View Post

    this sure is a gem


    I have seen multiple absurd posts by this guy now and im starting to think his account is just a huge level
  16. I usually use M until I'm under 20BB or so, then I switch to BB.

    I have a more general question about M though...I've read Harrington's books multiple times, and his discussion of play in the Yellow and Orange Zones is VERY limited. I understand that small pairs and suited connectors go down in value, because you're not getting the implied odds, but I'm not exactly sure what goes UP in value. Obviously you're willing to play AA down to the felt at this point, but I've seen advice for these Zones range everywhere from "tighten up" to "loosen up". Harrington does say to play your high cards more strongly...does he mean you're getting more aggressive and opening wider with stuff like AT, KJ, etc., or you're just being more willing to go bust with AK or a high pair? Never have quite seen a good explanation for these zones, anybody got any suggestions?

    Thanks,
    Blue
  17.  
    Originally Posted by poisoneye1986 View Post

    1000/2000/250

    pot=5250

    chip stack: 25000

    Harrington advices shoving with an M of 5 or less.

    I don't remember If Harrington said move all in at 5 or 4 M but at an M of 5 I'm still choosing my hands. Once I get to 4 if its checked to me it's "All on baby ". With any 2.
  18. A big detail in using either M or BB is applying to the game you are playing. I personally play a ton of the 3.30 90man KOs, so stacks are never deep late in tournies. Therefore i have to slide my scale of M and zones down where having an M of 6 is actually a solid stack at the final table.. shoving Ms of 10 with the same range of hands as a Deep Stack tourney is just bad buisness. You have to come up with a feel of table & game selection to change your range accordingly.
  19. Cool little trick I learned because I am a BB guy also....Holdem Manager has it so you can add a players "M" to the HUD. If you are like me and stuck on BB's, it could help to get M down by having it above a players head all the time.

Similar Threads