[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
officialpokerrankings I don't feel is accurate and sharkscope..well..lol
-thanks in advance
pokerstars, hustlingpimp
*just want to get an idea of how some of you perceive a player just based on results/stats. -
I think Official poker rankings is almost 100% accurate. It list every tourney you played in, what place you got, how much you cashed for etc. I find it completely accurate for my own stats.
Your stats are not bad, def dont suck. You have a High ROI 88% in Omaha and are profitable in NL holdem. Looks like the only games you have negative ROI is omaha h/l , l,pl holdem and other games -
play plo8 more, only thing I can win in!!!
-
obv brag post
-
Thanks a bunch for your input, the reason I feel is not accurate (OPR) is because of the rebuys. I rarely re-buy in tourneys but it takes a lot of $ from my profit.
Originally Posted by joeschmo
I think Official poker rankings is almost 100% accurate. It list every tourney you played in, what place you got, how much you cashed for etc. I find it completely accurate for my own stats.
Your stats are not bad, def dont suck. You have a High ROI 88% in Omaha and are profitable in NL holdem. Looks like the only games you have negative ROI is omaha h/l , l,pl holdem and other games -
On a scale of 1-100, based on your results I would say that you are somewhere between a 25-80. Basically results tell you very, very little. You probably don't suck and you probably are not a genius.
-
You're up by a good amt. Seems like you're doing well to me.
-
Hey Cal, thanks for your response.
Originally Posted by CalBandGreat
On a scale of 1-100, based on your results I would say that you are somewhere between a 25-80. Basically results tell you very, very little. You probably don't suck and you probably are not a genius.
Now I know results don't tell you much but I also wanted to know where I stand. Any ideas on how I can get better? -
Like I was once told,
"You're not a fish, well, maybe a guppy." -
Cardrunners.com or any of the other main training web sites, they are great, gl! Also read the 2+2 HSMTT strategy forum.
Originally Posted by muckafella
Hey Cal, thanks for your response.Originally Posted by CalBandGreat
On a scale of 1-100, based on your results I would say that you are somewhere between a 25-80. Basically results tell you very, very little. You probably don't suck and you probably are not a genius.
Now I know results don't tell you much but I also wanted to know where I stand. Any ideas on how I can get better? -
yep!
Similar Threads
-
0 Replies
like i didnt expect this suck-resuck-super suck...
Last Post: Dec 8th, 2006, 09:27 AM - 2 Replies
- 0 Replies
-
10 Replies
this is just a hilariou SUCK, RE-SUCK and SUPER RE-RE-SUCK. suited connector special.
By nowapowa in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jul 10th, 2006, 01:48 AM -
8 Replies
The old stars suck, re-suck, and re-re-suck
By dd in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jul 6th, 2006, 01:38 AM










