Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. I'm just curious on a better than average players ratio wins to losses on something like this? Is it possible to win 50 in a row ? What kind of win streaks would a "pro" or "veteran" go on in this kind of limit?
  2. I'd think 50 in a row is approaching potripper status. Well considering the BOP totals (Which I'm not 100% accurate on ) I would say maybe the best player could feasibly win 10 of 15 maybe

    But have no basis on this just guesstimates
  3. potripper status? (noob here sorry)
    Thread Starter
  4. To tell you the truth, it really isn't about what kind of streak you go on. The sharkscope leader for 6-max turbos in 2010 had a 13% ROI over like 13k games. The main goal is to have a 5% ROI or greater and you make money by playing them in VOLUME!
  5. so is it possible to win 50 in a row?
    Thread Starter
  6. Google potripper, he hacked the software so could see other player's cards

    no, it's not possible to win 50 in a row
  7. Even 15 or 10 is pretty much impossible. Way too much shit involved to run that good, even if you could see their cards.

    Pretty sure there was a site a few years ago giving away $1,000,000 to anyone who could win 7 or 8 or something sngs in a row. Not sure if anyone ever did it, but that gives you an idea of how statistically improbable it is.
  8. I can win 3 in a row, I don't see how a pro couldn't do 10
    Thread Starter
  9. 0.7 on a good day
  10.  
    Originally Posted by sixslow View Post

    I can win 3 in a row, I don't see how a pro couldn't do 10

    if u can one 3 in a row like every 3 hours.. u r really..good..

    3 in a row once in a while is not that hard.
  11. Impossible to win 50 in a row
  12. titan poker used to have 5$ sng that if you won 6(i think) in a row you won a share of 20k(i think).
    and a 2$ sng that if you won 8 in a row you got 2k i think, not sure it happened very often!

    So yea 50 is ridiculous!
  13. soooooooooooooooo basically if you can keep a 2:1 ratio you're doing 1000x better than most people

    I could see on pokerstars 50 , fifity fiftey wins in a row possible, maybe even double or nothings
    Thread Starter
  14. You are really looking at these the wrong way. You can't finish first at a 2:1 ratio. There is an amount you are In The Money and then there is also your ROI. I don't know whether you are looking to make a steady profit in these or just think you are going to play a couple hundred and turn a huge profit?
  15. steady making profit i.e. 2:1 ratio
    Thread Starter
  16. def should not be worrying about if u can win X amount in a row, doesn't work that way
  17. if my goal is not to obtain a 2:1 ratio what is my goal?
    Thread Starter
  18. Have a +ROI over a high volume amount at whatever level you chose to play.
  19. I don't know the payout for these but +volume any type +ROI sounds good to me you don't always have to win but yes it would be nice and make life easier, but you could play 3 hours on a few tables that you win where there will be some sick volume bot that makes more thanh you simple cause they handle volume better
  20. I don't see how you can't obtain a 2:1 ratio easily? I mean half of poker is good folds, sure you're going to have bad days, but your focus on winning will help. I feel like this is more than possible, ESPECIALLY in the double or nothings / fiftey fiftey new games
    Thread Starter
  21.  
    Originally Posted by sixslow View Post

    I don't see how you can't obtain a 2:1 ratio easily? I mean half of poker is good folds, sure you're going to have bad days, but your focus on winning will help. I feel like this is more than possible, ESPECIALLY in the double or nothings / fiftey fiftey new games

    go play 5k fifty fifty SNGs and let us know if you money 2:1 ratio
  22. well i suck but, im talking about someone with skill
    Thread Starter
  23. no. it's so out of the question its ridiculous
  24. i dont believe so
    Thread Starter
  25. 1
  26. 50 MIRRRION
  27.  
    Originally Posted by sixslow View Post

    i dont believe so

    i'm sorry but why are you asking the question if when people tell you its ridiculous you disagree anyways?
  28. I was expecting a different response, I can't believe you all think it's impossible to obtain a 2:1 ratio consistently
    Thread Starter
  29.  
    Originally Posted by sixslow View Post

    so is it possible to win 50 in a row?


    thats what i was referring to, and there's a difference between flat out winning (coming in first) and cashing. do you consider cashing winning?
    Edited By: msc Feb 3rd, 2011 at 01:05 AM
  30.  
    Originally Posted by sixslow View Post

    I was expecting a different response, I can't believe you all think it's impossible to obtain a 2:1 ratio consistently


    So why don't you put your money where your mouth is and do it yourself or STFU about it. You came here asking a question we told you the answer and you still debate it. GTFO noob

Similar Threads