Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. At the level I am playing at (mostly .25/.50 NL) I am making 7.32 BB/100 over 16K hands. I feel like overall I have been running pretty well but taken some beats as well.

    Should I feel that this is fairly accurate or is the sample size still too small?

    If too small, how many hands do you feel are needed to trust your BB/100 in PT?
  2. 60/70k , 7.3s is above avg so far
     
  3. There must be some statistical analysis that should give the precision of the BB/100 number based on the number of hands. Standard Deviation? It's been a long time since my statistics class in college.

    i.e.

    @60K hands BB/100 accurate +/- 0.5
    @40K hands BB/100 accurate +/- 1.0
    etc
    etc

    Any math geniuses out there?
    Thread Starter
  4. I'm pretty sure PokerTracker gives you your Standard Deviation.
  5. Really? That many? I had heard it was somewhere around the 25k mark.
  6. is that 7.32 BB/100 or 7.32 PT BB/100? If it's pokertracker you can multiply by 2 to get your real BB/100. You're doing really well but 16k hands is pretty small. Most will say 100k hands is a true indicator.
  7. 25k tells you whether or not you are a winning player or a losing player. I would need 100k+ before I trust it at all
    2

Similar Threads