Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHlky0NQDsw

    How did he know???? he must have a sick tell
    just watch an enjoy.........
  2. How do you not just get up and walk out?
  3. the call really isn't that sick 4Ts is the same as Kx, obv nice read but nothing out of the ordinary imo
  4. durrr's face is a classic.
  5.  
    Originally Posted by ndgrinder59 View Post

    the call really isn't that sick 4Ts is the same as Kx, obv nice read but nothing out of the ordinary imo

    ok hellmuth
     
  6.  
    Originally Posted by ndgrinder59 View Post

    the call really isn't that sick 4Ts is the same as Kx, obv nice read but nothing out of the ordinary imo

    you gotta be fucking kidding
  7.  
    Originally Posted by ndgrinder59 View Post

    the call really isn't that sick 4Ts is the same as Kx, obv nice read but nothing out of the ordinary imo

    what?

    also this happened like 10 years ago. but still is pretty sick.
  8. hahaha nd, what tables and site do you play on?
     
  9. Laak is only representing AA, AK, KK, or QQ. He is so nitty and usually doesnt play the nuts like this. Antonius basically says nuts or nothing. Easy call IMO
     
  10. and btw, qq is out of his range with the turn bet.
     
  11. Laak is god awful, and checks AA on every flop like a robot...his range is so polarized. Its clearly a great call but its not that ridiculous.
     1
  12.  
    Originally Posted by gotzballz View Post

    Laak is only representing AA, AK, KK, or <strike>QQ</strike> KQhh. He is so nitty and usually doesnt play the nuts like this. Antonius basically says nuts or nothing. <strike>Easy call </strike>IMO

    i think that's a little more accurate. a turn bet with QQ would not be good.

    lol at "easy call" people, hopefully all levelers
  13.  
    Originally Posted by simpledude View Post

     
    Originally Posted by ndgrinder59 View Post

    the call really isn't that sick 4Ts is the same as Kx, obv nice read but nothing out of the ordinary imo

    you gotta be fucking kidding

    grinder is actually right .. my buddy and i talked about this hand and obviously antonius makes a great call but the call makes sense .. not going to explain further but basically laak either has a few exact hands or its a bluff .. he is never betting the way he did with a wide range of hands that have antonius beat
  14. too words : results orientated.
  15.  
    Originally Posted by maxgridlock View Post

    too words : results orientated.

    lol agrii
  16. This was last season on HSP, right?
  17.  
    Originally Posted by gotzballz View Post

    Laak is only representing AA, AK, KK, or QQ. He is so nitty and usually doesnt play the nuts like this. Antonius basically says nuts or nothing. Easy call IMO

    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
  18. people have extreme double standards... wat makes this such a fantastic call is because it does make very sound logical sense... it's not 'nothing spectacular' because the reasoning behind the call is accurate, that's why it is a great call... if phil laak was the type to be 3 barrelling as he did with the same mannerisms widely for value then even if antonius' hand was good this time, people would all be saying how it was a lucky/donk call. you don't see many better calls than this that aren't as a result of some sick physical tell. saying this is an easy call is beyond retarded since phil laak 3 barrels off 6 figures approximately once every two years.
    1
  19. Andy Mcleod owned this thread.
  20.  
    Originally Posted by Andy McLEOD View Post

    people have extreme double standards... wat makes this such a fantastic call is because it does make very sound logical sense... it's not 'nothing spectacular' because the reasoning behind the call is accurate, that's why it is a great call... if phil laak was the type to be 3 barrelling as he did with the same mannerisms widely for value then even if antonius' hand was good this time, people would all be saying how it was a lucky/donk call. you don't see many better calls than this that aren't as a result of some sick physical tell. saying this is an easy call is beyond retarded since phil laak 3 barrels off 6 figures approximately once ever.<STRIKE>y two years.</STRIKE>

    and i bet he was so sick after that hand, hell never do it again.

    but i still dont think it was amazing. laak is suuuch a nit theres like 0% chance he has a hand besides AA imo. it literally is AA or a bluff the way he played it. KK he doesnt bet that much on turn for sure, as well as ak(he prob even checks). but the fact that 99.9999% laak has aa here, makes it a pretty good read.
     
  21. Damn, if I only thought like you Andy...this game would be easy. You should post more!
     
  22.  
    Originally Posted by maxgridlock View Post

    too words : results orientated.

    if you're gonna be short and sweet, at least be short, sweet and grammatically correct.
  23.  
    Originally Posted by leftygrove View Post

     
    Originally Posted by gotzballz View Post

    Laak is only representing AA, AK, KK, or <strike>QQ</strike> KQhh. He is so nitty and usually doesnt play the nuts like this. Antonius basically says nuts or nothing. <strike>Easy call </strike>IMO

    i think that's a little more accurate. a turn bet with QQ would not be good.

    lol at "easy call" people, hopefully all levelers

    Why would a turn bet not be good? I doubt antonius has Kx in his range, other than K high flush draws and we really can't expect him to check shove or anything if we bet turn. The K is a good card to rep a bluff with and it would be best to bet turn with QQ over checking and then betting river since you can get value from draws by doing so..

    Anyway this call really isn't that amazing but it's still a cool hand.
     
  24. lol @ negranu laughing his head off at the end
  25. Did no one ever think that it was POSSIBLE that Phil Laak could have been value betting there?? That's why he got so upset about Antonious's call. I think it was still a good call in the end though. O yeah, before any of you donkeys say that a value bet is smaller piss off. I value bet half the pot at least everytime I do it... O yeah don't bother saying "level" either because turning $20 into $10,000 is all the level I need.
  26. when this hand was posted before someone pointed out a possible tell on laak that maybe PA picked up on? laak didnt do his odd amount bet like in the previous hsp seasons when he had a monster. pa seemed to be on to it already but the bet amount tell probably helped
  27. <BLOCKQUOTE> <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=P5_Quote_Author> maxgridlock:</TD><TD></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
    too words : results orientated.

    </BLOCKQUOTE>

    if you're gonna be short and sweet, at least be short, sweet and grammatically correct.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    and if u r gonna critique someone's grammar, make sure they have made a grammar error and not a spelling mistake
  28.  
    Originally Posted by quietwinner View Post

     
    Originally Posted by Andy McLEOD View Post

    people have extreme double standards... wat makes this such a fantastic call is because it does make very sound logical sense... it's not 'nothing spectacular' because the reasoning behind the call is accurate, that's why it is a great call... if phil laak was the type to be 3 barrelling as he did with the same mannerisms widely for value then even if antonius' hand was good this time, people would all be saying how it was a lucky/donk call. you don't see many better calls than this that aren't as a result of some sick physical tell. saying this is an easy call is beyond retarded since phil laak 3 barrels off 6 figures approximately once ever.<strike>y two years.</strike>

    and i bet he was so sick after that hand, hell never do it again.

    but i still dont think it was amazing. laak is suuuch a nit theres like 0% chance he has a hand besides AA imo. it literally is AA or a bluff the way he played it. KK he doesnt bet that much on turn for sure, as well as ak(he prob even checks). but the fact that 99.9999% laak has aa here, makes it a pretty good read.

    No, Laak checks AA on river. Only thing he would bet that river with is KK and QQ and he isnt betting QQ on the turn.
     

Similar Threads