[x]

I observed this on a final table,, Please explain

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 11
  1. misterizx misterizx is offline

    Woodlake, CA
    United States

    Posts: 2,367
    Joined: Aug 05

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 12:52pm)

    This was just a $4 180 man final table but could anyone explain this play. I tend to get irritated on some calls I get, but I dont understand this at all. Makes him chip leader though. Seriously, if there is something I do not understand please explain Candacemans action

    rStars Game #4633438164: Tournament #23112618, $4.00+$0.40 Hold'em No Limit - Level XIII (1000/2000) - 2006/04/15 - 12:45:35 (ET)
    Table '23112618 16' 9-max Seat #4 is the button
    Seat 1: candaceland (39459 in chips)
    Seat 2: pmyxdm (26624 in chips)
    Seat 3: marcgo (52890 in chips)
    Seat 4: MUBBLESX19 (47856 in chips)
    Seat 5: framework (25375 in chips)
    Seat 8: cooksginger (48272 in chips)
    Seat 9: SC_name_less (29524 in chips)
    candaceland: posts the ante 100
    pmyxdm: posts the ante 100
    marcgo: posts the ante 100
    MUBBLESX19: posts the ante 100
    framework: posts the ante 100
    cooksginger: posts the ante 100
    SC_name_less: posts the ante 100
    framework: posts small blind 1000
    cooksginger: posts big blind 2000
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    SC_name_less: folds
    candaceland: calls 2000
    pmyxdm: raises 6000 to 8000
    marcgo: folds
    MUBBLESX19: folds
    framework: calls 7000
    cooksginger: folds
    candaceland: calls 6000
    *** FLOP *** [7d 7h 4c]
    framework: checks
    candaceland: bets 2000
    pmyxdm: raises 6000 to 8000
    framework: folds
    candaceland: calls 6000
    *** TURN *** [7d 7h 4c] [6d]
    candaceland: checks
    pmyxdm: bets 10524 and is all-in
    candaceland: calls 10524
    *** RIVER *** [7d 7h 4c 6d] [Tc]
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    candaceland: shows [9h Th] (two pair, Tens and Sevens)
    pmyxdm: shows [Ac 6s] (two pair, Sevens and Sixes)
    candaceland collected 63748 from pot
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 63748 | Rake 0
    Board [7d 7h 4c 6d Tc]
    Seat 1: candaceland showed [9h Th] and won (63748) with two pair, Tens and Sevens
    Seat 2: pmyxdm showed [Ac 6s] and lost with two pair, Sevens and Sixes
    Seat 3: marcgo folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 4: MUBBLESX19 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 5: framework (small blind) folded on the Flop
    Seat 8: cooksginger (big blind) folded before Flop
    Seat 9: SC_name_less folded before Flop (didn't bet)
  2. avarice avarice is offline

    Saskatoon
    Canada

    Posts: 653
    Joined: Mar 06

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 12:54pm) in reply to misterizx

    runner runner straight obv.
  3. gamaitec gamaitec is offline

    Arlington, VA
    United States

    Posts: 3,861
    Joined: Dec 05

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 12:56pm) in reply to misterizx

    He figured he had 10 outs and decided to gamble, I guess?
     
  4. Octan3_ipwnsippin Octan3_ipwnsippin is offline

    Winnipeg
    Canada

    Posts: 6,263
    Joined: Feb 06

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 12:57pm) in reply to avarice

    AHAHAHAH i hope this guy ends up at some of my tbales SOON
  5. sevenninesuited sevenninesuited is offline

    Oakton, VA
    United States

    Posts: 635
    Joined: Sep 05

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 12:58pm) in reply to misterizx

    its a $4 tournament and clearly hes a donk

    no reasoning is possible
  6. bdubs3737 bdubs3737 is offline

    United States

    Posts: 2,151
    Joined: Nov 05

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 1:01pm) in reply to sevenninesuited

    sometimes u just "feel it coming"

    or maybe he had good read on dealer?

    or he has one of those sweet, yet rare, card predicting softwares
     
  7. misterizx misterizx is offline

    Woodlake, CA
    United States

    Posts: 2,367
    Joined: Aug 05

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 1:02pm) in reply to sevenninesuited

    Yeah but its the final table. Im seriously wondering what the deal was, he must have some ability to make it that far. If doing nothing but playing good cards. I have had quite a lot of my semibluffs called when people have no pair or draw, when the should have folded on the flop. It happens enough and I lose enough to wonder if I dont recognize something. Does he have enough of a read to know the guy was bluffing and was willing to race with one card left? was it an aww hell call because he invested so many chips?

    I didnt really think anyone would have an answer, it just blows my mind though.
    Thread Starter
  8. misterizx misterizx is offline

    Woodlake, CA
    United States

    Posts: 2,367
    Joined: Aug 05

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 1:06pm) in reply to bdubs3737

    Bdubs.You forgot to give him the "It was suited" out to start the hand.
    Thread Starter
  9. dynamite d dynamite d is offline

    Clarksburg, WV
    United States

    Posts: 437
    Joined: Mar 06

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 5:10pm) in reply to misterizx

    who is truly the donk here. I would say A6. What was the A6 thinking he was going to win with this hand. The other guy had suited connectors and A6 re-raised with a 774 board with no pair when the other bettor could have had a 3rd 7. so who is really the donk in this instance. But the turn brought him an inside straight draw, which if it hits would have busted A6 anyways so what's the difference.
  10. ranchgirl ranchgirl is offline

    Austin, TX
    United States

    Posts: 1,038
    Joined: Mar 06

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 5:21pm) in reply to misterizx

    This one is easy. I've seen it a hundred times. The guys gets up to use the bathroom and the cat walks on the keyboard. Simple enough.
  11. misterizx misterizx is offline

    Woodlake, CA
    United States

    Posts: 2,367
    Joined: Aug 05

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 5:32pm) in reply to dynamite d

    WEll the A 6 is making a play at least the other guy is calling with nothing and no real draw. But whatever.
    Thread Starter
  12. Cashweekly Cashweekly is offline

    United States

    Posts: 2,426
    Joined: Aug 05

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 6:33pm) in reply to misterizx

    "Yeah but its the final table. Im seriously wondering what the deal was, he must have some ability to make it that far."

    This is not necessarily a good assumption.........
  13. amymarie1967 amymarie1967 is offline

    Columbus, OH
    United States

    Posts: 3,741
    Joined: Jan 06

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 6:38pm) in reply to misterizx

    Nooo, he lets his child play for him while he goes outside for a smoke.
  14. MannaMan MannaMan is offline

    Boston, MA
    United States

    Posts: 83
    Joined: Oct 05

    Apr 15th, 2006 (4/15/2006 7:00pm) in reply to amymarie1967

    Yah, here's the problem: stop playing $4 180 man sit-n'-go's.... too many idiot donkeys and fish!
Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 11