Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. Im always hearing pros saying, "Oh man you should have seen poker 10 years ago", or "back then, no one knew how to play good, and now the bad players atleast know how to play"

    I didnt play poker 8-10 years ago, but what was it like? Was everyone at the table going all in blind or something? No one folds nowadays. If someone raises, they get 5 callers. I see people calling 30BB allins with J9 (because its suited!). UTG raising and UTG+1 calling.. Flop 22x,, UTG+1 having 28o.These are midstakes tourneys. $20-100 freezeouts. Im just curious what the play was like 10 years ago, I cant fathom how it could be worse than now. Did people know how to fold back then? A rag is like the nuts nowadays.
  2. I think the idea is that it's easier to beat a player who always folds than one who never does.
     
  3. unfortunately you are not correct
     
  4. People are just as horrible as they were back then.

    Difference is back then they folded way too often and these days they hit raise/call way too often.
     
  5.  
    Originally Posted by TheGibbons View Post

    I think the idea is that it's easier to beat a player who always folds than one who never does.

    Well thats what im guessing, but i would say the players are worse now. Atleast people knew how to fold.
    Thread Starter
  6. believe it,

    people are definitely still bad though, i'd say the main difference is that people apply a lot more pressure today.
     
  7. I'm only 24 but I think the same level of bad players exist today. The difference is there the good players today are much better than the best players were 10 years ago. There are also a lot more people in between the really bad players and the really good players which take away from your EV as well.
  8. <<<< BAD BEATS
  9. the higher stakes are getting tougher but o man played a 24$ multi entry today... yeah noone thinks
     1
  10.  
    Originally Posted by spectrefax View Post

    People are just as horrible as they were back then.

    Difference is back then they folded way too often and these days they hit raise/call way too often.

     
    Originally Posted by doubledave22 View Post

    the higher stakes are getting tougher but o man played a 24$ multi entry today... yeah noone thinks

    yep
     
  11.  
    Originally Posted by rmull View Post

    believe it,

    people are definitely still bad though, i'd say the main difference is that people apply a lot more pressure today.


    i'd agree with this. People are still bad but just diffferent. Much more aggro bad than before.
     
  12.  
    Originally Posted by KarateChamp View Post

    Im always hearing pros saying, "Oh man you should have seen poker 10 years ago", or "back then, no one knew how to play good, and now the bad players atleast know how to play"

    I didnt play poker 8-10 years ago, but what was it like? Was everyone at the table going all in blind or something? No one folds nowadays. If someone raises, they get 5 callers. I see people calling 30BB allins with J9 (because its suited!). UTG raising and UTG+1 calling.. Flop 22x,, UTG+1 having 28o.These are midstakes tourneys. $20-100 freezeouts. Im just curious what the play was like 10 years ago, I cant fathom how it could be worse than now. Did people know how to fold back then? A rag is like the nuts nowadays.

    Sounds like you play on pokerstars, but anyway,welcome to the crowd of people that never can get there premium hands to hold up deep in important tournaments, which leaves you feeling like you have left hundreds or thousands of dollars on the table due to suckouts....obviously standard.
  13. I have to completely disagree with the poster. Nowadays of course there way more players! So obviously you will run across every type good, bad, indifferent. I guess the best way is just to contrast the "bad" players from both time periods.

    Back Then:
    I see bad players as not knowing ANYTHING.
    Position
    Odds
    Value of Hands
    More often "Gamblers"?

    Today:
    I see bad players as not knowing how to apply knowledge.
    Too Tight
    Really good players now for the most part have a developed 3-bet gear,
    I dont think this was true back then. The good players were the ones who were abusing position w/ pot control.

    Poker is most definitely an ever evolving game, time will only tell if the games will get better or worse!
    I find it very +ev nowadays though. Lol. GLGL ALL!
  14. OP also don't forget that live $20-$100 tourneys are considered "low stakes"
  15. -You do realize ten years ago 3betting only existed if you had AA or KK, right?

    -Tournament play was done once a year at the main for anyone who had a clue. There was no circuit or place to practice your game

    -Not nearly as much literature.... and the literature wasn't good

    -No idea about stack sizes and how they affect your tournament

    -No tournament strategy sites

    -No Seminars

    -should I keep going?
    Edited By: Wein Mar 2nd, 2011 at 12:53 AM
     
  16. again, weeeeeeeeeeen wins.

    wtf, its wein again. nvm
    Edited By: Deoxyribo Mar 2nd, 2011 at 01:22 AM
     
  17. Every time I see someone fully 3x the blinds, or blind down to 4bbs, or raise/fold with 10bbs from the cutoff I wax nostalgic for the oldern days (and I started later than most- Dec 2005).

    Oh, and weeeeen wins again. He is on a heater when it comes to intelligent posts.
     
  18. Pre 2006 they were awful. Beyond awful.

    Here's the best example I can think of to explain.

    I once finished 2nd in a $10 one table SNG at party.

    Why is that so special?

    Because I passed out in my chair with 6 people still left in it.
  19. its better to be too aggro than to be too passive
  20. <<<---- I was one of the biggest tight asses you would ever meet back in day on pokerroom.
    I remember when I first started playing I was down 2000 learning to play at the $30-$50 sit goes.
    I qualied into the Grand I believe they used to call it.
    1000 buy in.
    I got down to the bubble and folded KK preflop bc I was scared the donkey raiser would call me with 39 the SIK back on PR and beat me!
    I was so desperate to get in the money for over 2k that I folded KK pre.
    Everyone used to make fun of me.
    Judge raises? Quick everyone fold!
    I cant say im much better today LOL But I def have a 3 bet in me now even while holding 39 myself. So I disagree with your post.
    I was judgegammon im sure some of the older p5s members may remember me from back on pokerroom.
    TheChemist is one of them. Shit back then Chem was as tight as me!
  21.  
    Originally Posted by doubledave22 View Post

    the higher stakes are getting tougher but o man played a 24$ multi entry today... yeah noone thinks

    wow bro you busto??
  22. ween- yeah you win!

    Curious though what you think about the players that still are terribad. Do they suck in the same way or has their suckage changed and manifest differently as some of us have proposed?
     
  23.  
    Originally Posted by random.chu View Post

    wow bro you busto??

    dave is confirmed busto.
     
  24.  
    Originally Posted by Marion Cobretti View Post

    Pre 2006 they were awful. Beyond awful.

    Here's the best example I can think of to explain.

    I once finished 2nd in a $10 one table SNG at party.

    Why is that so special?

    Because I passed out in my chair with 6 people still left in it.

    I miss when the first hand of a sng at least 2 people would go all in preflop. If someone didn't go out the first hand there must have been a split pot.
  25. the difference is that the players suck now because they all see all this aggression and try to do it themselves - but pick horrible spots but get lucky and build stacks because with pure aggro. it just happens.

    Five years ago - everyone folded and just waited for premiums.
     
  26. Forget TAG and LAG! Today there is a new tendency of playing FAG*, especially on rainbow flops, and this is probably the beginning of poker decadence.

    *Fish aggressive
  27. what are you playing, frerolls? Yeah tehre are some bad players at $10-$30 mtss but what you described, 5 players calling raises (pretty rare) and people calling 30bbs with j9s, sure this stuff happens but nowhere near as much as you describe.

    Also have you been known to 5x late, and say internet players suck?
     
  28. all in A4 off
  29.  
    Originally Posted by Kiribato View Post

    Forget TAG and LAG! Today there is a new tendency of playing FAG*, especially on rainbow flops, and this is probably the beginning of poker decadence.

    *Fish aggressive

    lol...i like this one. Could also add "BAG" meaning "blind aggressive" where a player cannot see his check or fold button and, judging by the hands he flips over, quite possibly doesn't look at his cards
  30. I am one who tries to learn the aggression. I believe its made me better but I dont play much anymore. At first I was constantly picking the wrong spots.
    This is what makes the difference between the sick players vs amateur like myself.
    What is the top 3 reasons you use when selecting aggression?
    Hope my question makes sense.

     
    Originally Posted by Wein View Post

    the difference is that the players suck now because they all see all this aggression and try to do it themselves - but pick horrible spots but get lucky and build stacks because with pure aggro. it just happens.

    Five years ago - everyone folded and just waited for premiums.