[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Been playing around with ICM scenarios and I'm confused by the results when a certain range (in this case 15%) contains two different sets of cards.
Edited By: Gregrrr Sep 27th, 2010 at 06:07 AM
Level: 100.0/200.0/0.0
Structure: 0.5/0.3/0.2
Players: 5
Runtime: 57ms [300 Iterations]
Player Stack Push% EQPre EQPost EQDiff
UTG 2700.0 15.2% 0.20 .2031 0.00307
CO 2700.0 18.1% 0.20 .2031 0.00305
BU 2700.0 31.2% 0.20 .2032 0.00318
SB 2700.0 71.9% 0.20 .1971 -0.00289
BB 2700.0 0.20. 1936 -0.00641
PU CA OC Range
UTG 15.2%, TT+ A2s+ ATo+ K9s+ KTo+ QTs+ QJo JTs
CO 2.6%, TT+ AKs
BU 0.5%, AA
SB 0.5%, AA
BB 0.5%, AA
BU 2.6%, TT+ AKs
SB 0.5%, AA
BB 0.5%, AA
SB 3.5%, TT+ AKs AKo
BB 0.9%, KK+
BB 4.2%, 99+ AQs+ AKo
CO 18.1%, 99+ A2s+ A9o+ A5o K9s+ KTo+ Q9s+ QJo J9s+
BU 4.2%, 99+ AQs+ AKo
SB 0.9%, KK+
BB 0.9%, KK+
SB 4.2%, 99+ AQs+ AKo
BB 0.9%, KK+
BB 5.4%, 99+ AJs+ AQo+
BU 31.2%, 22+ A2s+ A8o+ A5o-A2o K2s+ K9o+ Q8s+ QTo+ J8s+ JTo T8s+ 98s
SB 6.3%, 99+ AJs+ AJo+
BB 0.9%, KK+
BB 7.1%, 88+ ATs+ AJo+
SB 71.9%, 22+ Kx+ Q2s+ Q4o+ J2s+ J6o+ T2s+ T6o+ 92s+ 96o+ 82s+ 86o+73s+ 75o+ 62s+65o 52s+ 43s
BB 15.2%, 66+ A5s+ A8o+ K9s+ KJo+
Why would UTG push with 15.2%, TT+ A2s+ ATo+ K9s+ KTo+ QTs+ QJo JTs
and...
BB would call a SB shove with 15.2%, 66+ A5s+ A8o+ K9s+ KJo+ ?
Do sng pros really rank preflop hand values differently in pushing vs. calling situations?
btw... stove says the BB call range has better equity vs. a SB shove than the UTG push range does...63.44% to 62%
Reason: fixing chart columns -
Do you have the link to the site with the ICM. Your post runs together and makes my eyes cross.?
-
Ok, I can't make the columns line up but it's like this...
ICM has UTG shoving 5-handed with this range 15.2%, TT+ A2s+ ATo+ K9s+ KTo+ QTs+ QJo JTs
and it has the BB calling a SB shove with this 15.2%, 66+ A5s+ A8o+ K9s+ KJo+
both are 15.2% of possible hands but contain a different mix of hands.
Why are some hands better to shove and some better to call with? -
From Pokerstove:
{16.1%; 66+,A5s+,K9s+,QTs+,JTs,A8o+,KJo+}
{15.2%; TT+,A2s+,K9s+,QTs+,JTs,ATo+,KTo+,QJo}
Just different way of configuring the cards for a certain percentage. Probably programed difference.
Holdem Resources Results -
After removing the hands in the two ranges that are the same, these are the different hands...
... for pushing 5-handed UTG A2s, A3s, A4s, KTo, QTs, QJs, QJo, JTs
... for calling the SB shove A8o, A9o, 99, 88, 77, 66
Now, intuitively, why is one set of hands better for pushing and one set better for calling (according to ICM)? -
You generally need the upper (stronger range) to call a bet than you do when you are betting.
When you bet, you have some degree of fold equity and your range is not always going to face a showdown.
When you call all-in, your hand needs some degree of showdown value and should be better than your opponent's shoving range.
Similar Threads
-
22 Replies
Biggest Fail question of all time (a hypothetical question)
By Defndrofangels in Off Topic
Last Post: Jan 20th, 2010, 12:13 AM -
10 Replies
Baseball Parlay question ***EDIT--Question about Round Robin bets
Last Post: Jul 24th, 2009, 06:11 PM -
5 Replies
LOST question (question answered..no need to open now)
Last Post: Feb 25th, 2009, 08:56 PM -
4 Replies
Question about making a SNG spreadsheet...formula question
By Goodburger in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Dec 20th, 2007, 07:38 PM -
5 Replies
Question about IP address (non online gambling bill question)
By mesaplayeraz in Off Topic
Last Post: Oct 3rd, 2006, 04:38 AM










