Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1.  
    Originally Posted by Doc Sands View Post

    I think its despicable that guys enter this event and I want to know who played. After playing live with Deeb a few times, I was very surprised to learn that he lacked the maturity and class to sit this one out. Who else played?

    You for real?
    I would be suprised if any real woman (oh sorry lady) wants a womans only tourne.
    If they want a womens champ, they could all enter one of the open $1500 NLHE events, the highest finisher is champ.
    Going off your logic, why not men only comps.
  2. Having an LPGA and a PGA is alright I guess, because there's biological physical differences between men and women. But a separate poker tournament for women only?

    "You're just a woman with a small brain. With a brain a third the size of us. It's just science."
  3. DOC SANDS chill the fuc out.. its just a joke.. this clown takes himself to seriously imo.. whos gives a fuc if hes playin the ladies events, its funny as hell he dressed up as a woman
  4.  
    Originally Posted by Dissident View Post

    If we had a white person only tournament it would be racist.

    This

    Why have a women s only tournament and not have a Blacks Only, Asian Only etc...
     
  5. Two things:

    1. Wein is spot on, as usual. If there's a ladies event then there should be a senior citizen's event and a short people event, among others.

    2. Wanna know when its time to find yourself a slumpbuster? When Deeb's funbags start to look "kinda nice".
  6.  
    Originally Posted by MeJahAndOmaha View Post

    Two things:

    1. Wein is spot on, as usual. If there's a ladies event then there should be a senior citizen's event and a short people event, among others.

    2. Wanna know when its time to find yourself a slumpbuster? When Deeb's funbags start to look "kinda nice".

    well there is
    3 
  7. There is a senior's event? Well I'll be damned. How did the WSOP folks decide which groups would get their own special events? Where's the redhead's event, the US citizen only event, or the fat people's event?

    The point is women and seniors have all the same tools at their disposal to learn and play the game. They should not receive special treatment, especially if they want to be seen as equals.
  8. Two Rounds for a Tampon

    Posted 1 hour 6 minutes ago by BenConoley
    One of the dozen or so male players left in the event was recently penalized for taking out a tampon to use as a card protector. The floor ruled that he was to sit out for two rounds of play. We're not sure which rule he was violating, besides that of a lack of class, but he's back in action now - this time with the tampon in his pocket.



    Deeb Doubles


    Posted 33 minutes ago by 123md
    Another standing ovation from the field will have to wait since Shaun Deeb just doubled up. He raised to 300 in the hijack and the player in the small blind made the call.
    The flop came down and all the chips went into the middle. Deeb's was leading his opponent's . The turn card and river card were safe for Deeb and he is up to 3,700.
    Tags: Shaun Deeb.
    Edited By: ApesAreFun Jun 12th, 2010 at 01:11 AM
  9. I'll never play in a women's event and never really considered it.

    That said, I doubt i care one way or the other. Everyone attention whore's it up in their own way.
     
  10.  
    Originally Posted by Randers View Post

    I'll never play in a women's event and never really considered it.

    That said, I doubt i care one way or the other. Everyone attention whore's it up in their own way.

    pretty much this
  11. Pretty dumb/stupid/lame. I am amazed that 100% of the online community isn't sucking his e-penis tho.
  12. I'm kinda shocked Hellmuth didn't throw on a skirt and play.
  13. Lifetime ban plz.

    Men who entered the 2010 ladies event at the World Series of Poker could face a possible suspension or ban from future WSOP events, WSOP Communications Director Seth Palansky told Card Player today. More than a half-dozen men are confirmed to be playing in the annual ladies tournament, and some estimates on the floor are that the number of men who entered the event is in the double digits.
    In a tongue-in-cheek comment, Palansky called the development great news, before saying there will be consequences for any male who entered the event.
    We will have our repercussions against any man that entered the ladies tournament, said Palansky. There are consequences for actions, and theyll pay the price.
    Palansky said tournament organizers couldnt legally prevent any men from entering the event. They have discouraged men from doing so in the past, and discouraged entries again this year. Men have participated in ladies events at the World Series in past years, but never to this magnitude.
    We cant prevent anyone from entering a ladies tournament. If theyre scumbags, theyre scumbags, said Palansky. The good news is at the World Series of Poker, we have the right to refuse service to anyone at any time at any point that we deem, as operators of the event.
    When asked if there could be anywhere from a year ban to a lifetime ban for the male entrants, Palansky simply responded: Stay tuned.
    An official entrant list, with the number of men who entered the event, is not yet available.
    David Sesso, primarily an online player who also won a WSOP Circuit event in Indiana last year, is one of the men playing in todays event. He entered with a group of his friends, but claimed to be the one who came up with the idea.
    When asked why he entered a ladies event, Sesso said, When a girl wins a regular event, she gets all this attention. When a guy wins an event, its still pretty cool, but you dont get nearly this much attention.
    Sesso says he was discouraged a few times from registering for the event, but didnt say if any specific punishments were discussed.
    The lady at the cage kept letting me know that it was a ladies event, but I just stuck with it and got in, said Sesso. I was pretty much the first one (out of my group) to start talking about (entering the event). Some of them went really far with it and dressed up like girls.
    When the first male entry busted from the field, the Pavilion reportedly erupted in cheers.
    Kathy Liebert, widely considered one of the best female poker players with nearly $5.7 million in tournament winnings, said she understands the reasoning behind the guys decision, but still thinks they shouldve sat this one out.
    Its a ladies-only event, so the guys should probably just stay away, said Liebert, who said the mens decision to enter the event reflects a little bit on their character. Why play it? What are you trying to do? It seems like theyre just doing it for themselves.
  14. I would think the punishment should be clear in advance of them registering. Not really right to make up the rule after the fact and penalize the players with it.
  15. Vanessa Selbst

    she looks like a dude tho
  16. I agree it's pretty disturbing to not just leave the ladies alone for this, although I do think Deeb's promise of donating any winnings to a charity should give him a pass on any future punishments, while the tampon guy and some others should be punished for thier actions.
    Who cares if the Seniors and women have 1 event for themselves, neither tournament counts for WSPOY, and anyone who wins them would be proud to say they're the top woman or top senior.
  17. What I don't understand is, if you cannot prevent men from playing, yet you have "the right to refuse service to anyone at any time at any point that we deem, as operators of the event", why wouldn't you just insta refuse service from men who tried to sign up for the event? Those two statements seem to contradict each other.

    Playing in a ladies (or seniors) event isn't something I would do, but I don't think it's the height of scumbaggery either. It's just.....immature. And kind of mean spirited. And I'm not talking about the guys who dress up in drag and goof around with people like Deeb is doing this year and some (all?) of the Tiltboys did like a decade ago, I'm talking about the dudes who go and put on their Serious Poker Face.
     
  18. lol deeb looks better in drag.
  19.  
    Originally Posted by GambleAB View Post

    What I don't understand is, if you cannot prevent men from playing, yet you have "the right to refuse service to anyone at any time at any point that we deem, as operators of the event", why wouldn't you just insta refuse service from men who tried to sign up for the event? Those two statements seem to contradict each other.

    Playing in a ladies (or seniors) event isn't something I would do, but I don't think it's the height of scumbaggery either. It's just.....immature. And kind of mean spirited. And I'm not talking about the guys who dress up in drag and goof around with people like Deeb is doing this year and some (all?) of the Tiltboys did like a decade ago, I'm talking about the dudes who go and put on their Serious Poker Face.

    I think the problem is that you can't refuse service on the basis of gender - you can on the other hand (probably) refuse service arbitrarily. It's probably a pretty fine line and I'd be surprised if anything came of it.
  20. Why not end this retarded discussion by making it impossible for men to enter this tournament?
  21. Now while I agree its a dick move to play the event, If the WSOP allows you to register, I dont see how they can throw the ban hammer at you. THEY allowed men in. If there wasnt a rule banning them from playing, then its technically allowed. Before they start banning players for entering, maybe they should actually not take their entry fee, rake, etc...
     
  22.  
    Originally Posted by GambleAB View Post

    And I'm not talking about the guys who dress up in drag and goof around with people like Deeb is doing this year and some (all?) of the Tiltboys did like a decade ago, I'm talking about the dudes who go and put on their Serious Poker Face.

    really? i think exactly the opposite. if you're just going to go play for the value, i think there's more respect in that than dressing up in drag/using a tampon as a card protector. doubt i care either way, but isn't the drag/tampon thing more immature?
     2
  23.  
    Originally Posted by dpottz View Post

    really? i think exactly the opposite. if you're just going to go play for the value, i think there's more respect in that than dressing up in drag/using a tampon as a card protector. doubt i care either way, but isn't the drag/tampon thing more immature?

    The way I see it, the guys who dress up in drag and goof around are poking fun at themselves. The guys who take it seriously are kind of disrespecting the spirit of the tournament.
    I mean, everyone who plays poker at least semi-seriously knows that you can sign up for a ladies (or seniors) tournament. Everyone. But nobody does it because it's not the right thing to do. Nobody playing that tournament is any smarter then the people who aren't playing it. They didn't figure something out that nobody has figured out before. They are just acting uncouth.
     
  24. in before Caster Semenya
  25.  
    Originally Posted by GambleAB View Post

    What I don't understand is, if you cannot prevent men from playing, yet you have "the right to refuse service to anyone at any time at any point that we deem, as operators of the event", why wouldn't you just insta refuse service from men who tried to sign up for the event? Those two statements seem to contradict each other.

    Playing in a ladies (or seniors) event isn't something I would do, but I don't think it's the height of scumbaggery either. It's just.....immature. And kind of mean spirited. And I'm not talking about the guys who dress up in drag and goof around with people like Deeb is doing this year and some (all?) of the Tiltboys did like a decade ago, I'm talking about the dudes who go and put on their Serious Poker Face.

    agree with this and the only thing that i really care about here is how unprofessionally and unfairly the wsop is handling this issue. it sounds like they didnt announce there would be a penalty for men entering the event (just some verbal discouragement from staff which is unprofessional as well imo) and are now going to issue some random discretionary penalty. the men who are legally entering this event should at least have some determinable penalty before they register. i wouldnt want some corporation to be able to penalize me at their discretion after the fact. not to mention the comments from that polansky guy in the cardplayer article seem to indicate he has a pretty strong personal opinion on the subject.
     1
  26. ok a few things about this.... first its so scummy witht that said though phil laak played in costume last year i think enough said...imagine if we had a mens only tourny or and under 30 tourny. would n could never happen and third n last of all the wsop has a **** up its ass thinking they can just ban everyone for nething. all they do if think they rule because we go n play there tournys. without us they would have nothing but they cant seem to grasp that and realize how they can have an unlimite amount of money every summer from now until poker dies which i dont see happening netime soon

    with that said i would never play this or a seniors tourny n everyone who does is trash unles they havea sick braclet bet/wsop cash bet... did dwan or kid who made the 11 cash bet with ivey play this? i forget him name as of now
     
  27.  
    Originally Posted by Spiltbongwater View Post

    I would think the punishment should be clear in advance of them registering. Not really right to make up the rule after the fact and penalize the players with it.

    This. Make the penalty known beforehand and then maybe you discourage some or all of them from registering in the first place. That would have been the intelligent thing to do if this d-bag palanski or whatever really didn't want people to register.

    Just waving the banhammer around after the fact is retarded and puts a bad taste in my mouth about how the wsop is handling things these days.

    That being said, if there is a punishment it has to be one size fits all, they can't pick and choose who meant it to be mean and who was making fun of themselves. You can't give some players a pass and then penalize others. To even suggest they should penalize some and not others is beyond stupid.
  28.  
    Originally Posted by jpapola View Post

    agree with this and the only thing that i really care about here is how unprofessionally and unfairly the wsop is handling this issue. it sounds like they didnt announce there would be a penalty for men entering the event (just some verbal discouragement from staff which is unprofessional as well imo) and are now going to issue some random discretionary penalty. the men who are legally entering this event should at least have some determinable penalty before they register. i wouldnt want some corporation to be able to penalize me at their discretion after the fact. not to mention the comments from that polansky guy in the cardplayer article seem to indicate he has a pretty strong personal opinion on the subject.

    This. If spmething is not against rules, then a ban is absurd and litigation would follow. Pointless posturing FTW.
     
  29.  
    Originally Posted by jaaaaaaack View Post

    This. If spmething is not against rules, then a ban is absurd and litigation would follow. Pointless posturing FTW.


    They can make whatever rules they like. And if they reserve the right to let people enter/not let them enter ta their discretion, you can litigate all you want but you will lose. The law is on their side - no different from any business that reserves the right to refuse service. As long as they aren't doing it for some otherwise *legally discriminatory* way (like bc you are gay, or black) they have the right.

    LOL at litigation too. thir fat bank account would pay for lawyers long after the plaintiffs were dead (plus they would win anyway)
     
Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 71 2 3 4

Similar Threads