Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. this thread brings lol'z

    deeb lol
  2.  
    Originally Posted by xAlyssax View Post

    awww sticks and stones will break my bones but names will go fuck your mother you pathetic, broke, sexist and of course limey cocksucker.

    Your mummy not put you to bed yet, your up too late for an infant.
    Edited By: rayfox111 Jun 16th, 2010 at 09:45 PM
  3.  
    Originally Posted by N 82 50 24 View Post

    Has it ever really been any different? :)

    lol touche
     
  4.  
    Originally Posted by mathclub View Post

    surely the logical thing is for the wsop to run 2 events side by side on same day, mens and womens, with the same buy in. that way women can have their event, and men can't complain it's sexist, cause there is an event for them to play in too. they could even have the winner of each event play each other heads up for $50k taken out of the prizepools or something, as a 'battle of the sexes' type thing if they wanted.

    I think this is a really good idea.
  5. bonflizubi i hear crickets.
  6. Why the hell do women need a tournament just for them?
  7.  
    Originally Posted by Gotskillz View Post

    bonflizubi i hear crickets.


    The dude hasn't gotten back to me yet with an answer. The first response he didn't read the question right and gave a lengthy thing on why they weren't stopping the men outright from playing the ladies. Emailed back that he had not answered the question... and haven't heard back. So much for friends you've had for 30 years....
     
  8. Ryan, how 'bout you spend a few minutes providing value on RPT?

Similar Threads