-
Let's say he's nor loose nor tight (neutral I guess) do I use an aggressive strategy or a passive one? Thi g is Harrington says if you have under m ratio 20 u should play aggressive however he says if you have 20+ u can choose your strategy. Heads up sit n go
Edited By: Izaak Feb 20th, 2012 at 06:44 PM -
If I'm playing heads up and have let's say I have 40 big blinds no antes in a sit n go. From harrigntons theory my ONLY move is all in or fold. Here's his theory.
M= chip stack divided by small blind big blind and antes (no antes in my example).
So let's say I have 40,000 stakes 500/1000.
This equals just a bit more than 25
He says you have to incorporate how many players there are so use this.
Mtotal= M x ( players divided by 10 )
So you do 25 x (2 divided by 10 )
This equals 5.
There are 5 zones
m ratio
20+ Comfortable stack size to play suited connecters small pocket pairs and get paid off. Can play tight or aggressive
10-20. Need to be abit more aggro steal blind and re steal really players connecters and small pockets for value
6-10 Steal blinds but can't re steal
1-6. All in or fold
0-1. Any 2
As you can see my equation gets me to 1-6 (ALL IN OR FOLD). is this correct? Please help -
I would throw out Harrington when heads up, and use Nash Equalibrium
http://www.holdemresources.net/hr/sngs/hune.html -
Harrington is referring to full table tournament I believe, not heads up.
Similar Threads
- 18 Replies
- 15 Replies
- 1 Replies
-
7 Replies
converting % to a ratio....please help me
By deletesweet_kate in Poker Discussion
Last Post: May 2nd, 2006, 08:21 PM - 2 Replies








