Let's say he's nor loose nor tight (neutral I guess) do I use an aggressive strategy or a passive one? Thi g is Harrington says if you have under m ratio 20 u should play aggressive however he says if you have 20+ u can choose your strategy. Heads up sit n goEdited By: Izaak Feb 20th, 2012 at 06:44 PM
If I'm playing heads up and have let's say I have 40 big blinds no antes in a sit n go. From harrigntons theory my ONLY move is all in or fold. Here's his theory.
M= chip stack divided by small blind big blind and antes (no antes in my example).
So let's say I have 40,000 stakes 500/1000.
This equals just a bit more than 25
He says you have to incorporate how many players there are so use this.
Mtotal= M x ( players divided by 10 )
So you do 25 x (2 divided by 10 )
This equals 5.
There are 5 zones
20+ Comfortable stack size to play suited connecters small pocket pairs and get paid off. Can play tight or aggressive
10-20. Need to be abit more aggro steal blind and re steal really players connecters and small pockets for value
6-10 Steal blinds but can't re steal
1-6. All in or fold
0-1. Any 2
As you can see my equation gets me to 1-6 (ALL IN OR FOLD). is this correct? Please help