-
^^^so says mr. last big cash in 2007! yikesss!!!!
-
What are you basing that on? Greg Raymer, Jamie Gold, Jerry Yang, and Joe Cada have also won the main event since 2003, so I'm pretty sure that makes them proven Main Event winners. There's tons of proof all over the internet that they won the main event, plus their pictures are on the wall. If that isn't proof than I don't know what is.
Originally Posted by flipxpelon562
since 2003 the only proven WSOP Main Event winners is Hashem and Eastgate...
Obviously they wouldn't make a sympathy thread for Matt Affleck if he was still in the tournament and huge chipleader, there would be nothing to be sympathetic about. That was an incredibly stupid comment. That's like saying the "Funnygut - 4th in the sunday warmup" thread wouldn't have ever been made if Funnygut didn't get 4th in the sunday warmup. Well DUH. -
I don't care if you've won $10 or $10,000,000. He got knocked out of the tournament, so he obviously played it wrong.
Originally Posted by mathclub
if you are new to pocketfives here's a hint. look at how much money people have won when you are deciding whether to take advice from them or not. The badges make it a lot easier. Here is what this thread is to me.
A) People who have won lots of money playing poker, many of them are pros, say he played it well.
B ) People who have never made any real money playing poker and have no results say he played it poorly.
Who do you think is right??????
Doesn't mean anyone with a few badges is always right, but when you see a bunch of guys with proven results saying one thing, and a bunch of guys who have never had any results saying something else it's not too hard figure out who is right. If you are in group B I suggest you read through and try and figure where the guys in group A have different thinking from you and then CHANGE YOUR THINKING to be more like this group. That is if you ever actually want to be good at poker. -
lol jesus h christ. Yeah ur prob right man, who wants to make the final table of the world series of poker main event with a big chiplead? no biggie. Nice 1st post i look forward to more contributions from you here on p5's in the future.
-
Greg Raymer, Jamie Gold, Jerry Yang, and Joe Cada.... You are joking right?
Originally Posted by flipxpelon562 
This thread wouldnt be made or replied to if the straight never hit on the river...
Obviously they wouldn't make a sympathy thread for Matt Affleck if he was still in the tournament and huge chipleader, there would be nothing to be sympathetic about. That was an incredibly stupid comment. That's like saying the "Funnygut - 4th in the sunday warmup" thread wouldn't have ever been made if Funnygut didn't get 4th in the sunday warmup. Well DUH.
I am trying to state the obvious that if this hand was played so perfect that other people are saying why would this thread have been created? thus another supporting argurment that shipping it pre would be better than playing it out postflop as indicated in other posts... -
he played the hand like a true champ without fear in the biggest turnamnet of the yr.. No question about that...he got it in with the best hand on the turn for a massive stack and went with a read that unfortnatly possible cost him millions...Now beens its so close to ft of the biggest turnamnet of the yr and he had a nice healthy stack to begin with if his read is wrong and he loses the pot he is (OUT) If he checks back the turn for pot controll he can find a way to fold on the river.. with 1 pair.. No way am i saying he played it bad he played it like a champ and a guy with no fear does and did..
-
Raymer is better than both of them.
Originally Posted by flipxpelon562
Lol so true Matt Obv shoved cuz he ranged him at kings why he asked him...and by shoving it makes Matt look weak inducing the call...I got to admit he has major sack to willing to be able to willing to bust with so much on the line if he knew he had a chance of having queens.. that situation I think u would be able to too Jy lol..u need to be a luckbox to win the main event anyways because only eastgate and haschem out of all the main event winners in the past 7 years actually had skill.
-
the retardness is this thread makes me smile.. one or two of these have to be levels, but some of these post a terribad.... Im glad he posted the timing itt, def sheds more light on the hand... awful beat at an awful time.. idk if i could handle it...
-
This thread is useless for anything other than praising his maturity level by going back and shaking everyone's hands after a beat that could potentially ruin someone's life permanently. How can anyone judge the way he played the hand without having his reads/experience against the player involved. We can't judge these things based on a few tv highlights from the several hours they spent together throughout the end of the tournament. He got it in good for chip lead and most likely a top 3 finish with one card to come. How can you insult that ever?
-
good post
Originally Posted by thechemist83
This thread is useless for anything other than praising his maturity level by going back and shaking everyone's hands after a beat that could potentially ruin someone's life permanently. How can anyone judge the way he played the hand without having his reads/experience against the player involved. We can't judge these things based on a few tv highlights from the several hours they spent together throughout the end of the tournament. He got it in good for chip lead and most likely a top 3 finish with one card to come. How can you insult that ever?
-
nobody is insulting his play. we non-badges just want to learn from his 10 million+ mistake right or wrong. but i guarantee the next time you're holding pocket aces and oh so close the big score, you will be thinking about affleck and shoving pre.
-
Excatly this, whether u think he played the hand right or wrong, it doesnt matter.
Originally Posted by thechemist83
This thread is useless for anything other than praising his maturity level by going back and shaking everyone's hands after a beat that could potentially ruin someone's life permanently. How can anyone judge the way he played the hand without having his reads/experience against the player involved. We can't judge these things based on a few tv highlights from the several hours they spent together throughout the end of the tournament. He got it in good for chip lead and most likely a top 3 finish with one card to come. How can you insult that ever?
The fact is took a huge bad beat on the river for a pot that was nothing other than life changing.
I think his reaction and his lip quivering told you just how much he wanted it, and how hard he had tried and well he had played throughout the gruelling 8 days of poker. I don't think many people who wanted it as bad as him would have come back in that room and taken the bad beat graciously. Should be very proud of the way you handled yourself.
Made me lol Duhamel i mean he doesnt have to feel bad or sympathetic to Matt, but at least rise your fucking arse up off your seat and shake his hand, that and his general reaction after pissed me off, realise u gave somebody the worst beat they will ever take in their life. -
Just LOL at you dude. You obviously will just never get it.
-
Edited By: thechemist83 Nov 4th, 2010 at 05:11 AMIf you non-badges (not all obviously) would ask questions in a productive manner without insults, assumptions, and judgements, us badges would post more often and be more likely to share productive info. Most threads here are exactly like this one and go south quickly, which make the great players less likely to share their advice for those few humble amateurs who are truly trying to learn to improve with an open mind.Originally Posted by jedd
nobody is insulting his play. we non-badges just want to learn from his 10 million+ mistake right or wrong. but i guarantee the next time you're holding pocket aces and oh so close the big score, you will be thinking about affleck and shoving pre.
As for the last part of your sentence, that is simply absurd. Good players are going to extract as much value as possible with their aces. If he felt he was getting called preflop, I imagine he would have done his best to get it all in preflop with the best hand in the game. -
Edited By: Wellwisher Nov 4th, 2010 at 05:28 AM^ kinda new here and I can already tell... please don't give up on those of us that are trying :) Thanks.Originally Posted by thechemist83
If you non-badges (not all obviously) would ask questions in a productive manner without insults, assumptions, and judgements, us badges would post more often and be more likely to share productive info. Most threads here are exactly like this one and go south quickly, which make the great players less likely to share their advice for those few humble amateurs who are truly trying to learn to improve with an open mind.
As for the beat and how Affleck handled it, wow, and he is only 23? uh, I would have slit my own throat right at the table and bled out all over the chips, but then again I am still working on my tilt issues... lol.
You obviously have the Mad Skill part wrapped up... so, Better Luck to you in the next one Affleck! This is me Wishing you Well! -
Exactly, as someone else mentioned...read the hand history at the time and thought it was gutting. I just saw it and it was exponentially worse than I could have imagined...
Originally Posted by thechemist83
This thread is useless for anything other than praising his maturity level by going back and shaking everyone's hands after a beat that could potentially ruin someone's life permanently. How can anyone judge the way he played the hand without having his reads/experience against the player involved. We can't judge these things based on a few tv highlights from the several hours they spent together throughout the end of the tournament. He got it in good for chip lead and most likely a top 3 finish with one card to come. How can you insult that ever?
2 years deep and amazing play
16 days of insanity
a minimum of $4M in equity gone with all the $ in as an 4-1 fav (playing to win and making the correct play)
not to mention all of the grinding in years before and the immediacy of one moment that feels like it will define or reward all your work.
It looked worse than a 6 year old finding his dead dog on the road. He handled that better than 99.9% of people... who will never be in that position. -
Edited By: donkthorne04 Nov 4th, 2010 at 05:55 AMyou and everyone else tarding up the thread, the novelty's worn off. huad, slowly. you guys obviously have 0 clue what you're talking about and are just being ignorant and stubborn. or those who aren't this are just pulling a stupid troll job. either way, get a life.Originally Posted by jedd
nobody is insulting his play. we non-badges just want to learn from his 10 million+ mistake right or wrong. but i guarantee the next time you're holding pocket aces and oh so close the big score, you will be thinking about affleck and shoving pre.
thread was originally about how matt handled a sickeningly painful beat and you jackasses have managed to dumb down the thread whilst being told over and over again why you're wrong.
ffs. -
LOL @ you idiots saying Matt played AA badly, what a bunch of retards.
Like duh obviously.
Oh, and MDshack is GOD -
1)- That hand is just too sick. Just reading about it on Poker News before any of the coverage, I just felt soooo so bad for him and I dont know who he is besides he plays online.
2)- Whenever anyone complains about anything in poker from now on you can just respond, 'at least you're not Matt Affleck'.
3)- That hand makes me never want to play live poker ever. With online poker you can get sucked out on the bubble at the Sunday Million, and that could be somewhat life changing, but at least you can fire up a new tournament right away, or play it again next week. And at least you only played for the day and didnt have everything emotional invested. With live poker you have to played for 8 days and invest so much. You come so close, and one card later its all done. If it happened to me I probably wouldn't kill myself just be severely depressed for a long long time. So I am impressed that he is still playing poker and I hope he can win it all next year. -
everyone plz stop saying that if affleck 5bet shoved pre duhamel is folding JJ.. its fking bvb and duhamel would still have 50bbs if he lost im pretty sure hes calling
-
u tool.. like it matters how matt played the hand. this thread is appreciation to how he played for 8 solid days, and how he handled the BAD beat like a man. Who gives a shit about anything else regarding this situation, ESPECIALLY how he played the hand.
Edited By: benwa1 Nov 4th, 2010 at 07:59 AM -
everyone has their own opinion i would put raymer still slightly below eastgate and haschem though...but way ahead of the other post 2003 champs...
-
This isn't nearly as bad as people are making it seem. Once this hand gets to the turn, I think JJ should just ship, but nevertheless, the call only loses like 13 bbs? He's got 21% equity calling 11 mil into a 31 mil pot. -3.something million. Not nearly as bad as Ivey v Monkeymaker in 03, this hand really isn't very poorly played.
Edited By: Nathan Zamora Nov 4th, 2010 at 08:25 AM
Folding is not an option for Affleck, whoever thinks he should pot control or something is retarded, its like half a pot shove. Stick it, imo.
BL, not nearly as bad as people make it out to be, plenty of people have lost plenty worse.
EDIT: It's not nearly as bad as the runner runner delivered to Cheong after some weirdo calls a 3b ship post on 665cc with 75ss, JC holding AA. -
Edited By: MikeBucks Nov 4th, 2010 at 08:35 AMI just cameOriginally Posted by RollTideRoll
I don't care if you've won $10 or $10,000,000. He got knocked out of the tournament, so he obviously played it wrong.
PS: I'm a fan Mr. Affleck, so sick, but I hope for good things in your future.
Reason: congratulating mcmatto -
would've been sick to watch a 4 way battle between: McMatto, Grinder, Subiime, and Pocket Five battle it out.
Would've been epic. -
How come a pack of brain-dead individuals, whose average high score wouldn't even cover the WSOP's ME rake, dares to criticize Matt's play during the hand is beyond the realms of reality. Go buy yourselves $1 of common sense, many of you need it desperately.
And I repeat what I said in my first post: I sincerely hope all those bad beats/whinner/morons learn a lesson from this guy, and stop crying about bubbling a $3 SNG, or go run under mom's sheets because you got 3 outed in the 1r FT.
Kudos to Mathclub's post :) -
Edited By: yarbles Nov 4th, 2010 at 09:17 AMi def agree with you man. hate when these DONKEYS call a raise with 77 and flop a set on my AA. if i'm first in a pot with AA i usually raise it really really big, like 8 or 9x the big blind just so they fold. if they want to play they go all in and i've got AA so jokes on THEM. AM I RIGHT!?they don't see that shit coming hahahaOriginally Posted by jedd
nobody is insulting his play. we non-badges just want to learn from his 10 million+ mistake right or wrong. but i guarantee the next time you're holding pocket aces and oh so close the big score, you will be thinking about affleck and shoving pre.
..i believe in small ball I alwayes raise 3 times the blind & if I wana raise bigggg it's 5times...well when u have an over Big pair & someone flop a set on u or 2 pairs it's a cooler but that's were ur skill comes 2 the test...r u really good enugh 2 fold the AA when u know u beat on a 7c9h4d & some one check raise u allin 4 all ur chips...u have 2 ask urself did he call me preeflopp with 97sited or maybe pocket 44 or he just floating with air with 58 & he has a inside...b...i mean that's @ least how I think....
Reason: maybe 5 or 6x bb is bettter then 9x -
I really didn't post this to show how good Afflecks play or how bad duhamels is but because I wanted to show everyone how happy we should feel sitting in front of our computers and busting in some 216$ tourney (at best), I did some research and found out that they played aprox 70 (!) hours until they reached the FT so take away max 5 hours from when Matt busted, he played 65 fckn hours of (probably) brilliant poker 65 HOURS.
Edited By: eDaN Nov 4th, 2010 at 09:16 AM
Now tell me aint it a marathon to play 10 hours in the milly and bust? LMFAO
This man did it twice, TWICE, back2back in the biggest fckn tourney on the planet (speaking of prestige at least).
Chipleader TWICE, "we" know the feeling of being chipleader and eventually busting and thinking:" How could I possibly have another deep run like this again? A once in a lifetime shot."
He did it and still got fcked cos just like Goldenad said in his brilliant thread, poker is a fckn bitch and OWES YOU NOTHING.
Not even Matt Affleck.
I did already post this but oh well, other than that, read benwa1's posts they're pretty spot on..
This thread is about the love to the game of poker and how people manage to come back again and again even after things like mcmatto had to take.
Similar Threads
- 3 Replies
- 8 Replies
-
5 Replies
How much credit do you give here.........?!?!?
By Mennas Joint in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jan 26th, 2008, 04:21 AM -
15 Replies
UB, I will give credit when credit is due.
By FortuneMeyers in Poker Discussion
Last Post: May 23rd, 2007, 02:23 AM









