[x]
  1. 3pm 33$KO is now a MET. I missed last sunday, but seems obvious now that FTP is gonna try to convert as many mtts to METs. Noticed a bunch more that ive never seen MET today , ranging from 5$ to 100$.

    I was a big fan of the MET concept, was a big fan of MET DOUBLE GUAR WEEK but I am NOT A FAN of the direction this is going ...


    having a couple gimmick weeks a year for METs and RUSH is fine but dont contaminate our regular weekly schedule with METs that force us to battle even more regs then we already go.
  2. Its been that way since after doub week.

    I like the ME's. If you don't like them there are a bizillion other tourney's to play
  3. ok as long as they arent changing a couple MTTs a week to METs, phew!
    Edited By: FouTight Feb 13th, 2011 at 05:45 PM
    Thread Starter
  4. im up in the air about them, i like them and i dont, i would def hope they dont turn everything into mets, registering 4-6 times in 1 tournament, just something seems wrong about it, aiding multies much?
     2
  5. I'd love em up if HEM worked with them, until then I won't play em. But if they make an exisiting tourney MET should double the guarantee IMO.
     
  6. The freaking rake should be lower for ME events.
    They should make the rake a tier.
    Play 1 entry regular rake
    2 entry 50% off 2nd rake
    3 entry 50% off 2nd rake and 75% off 3rd rake etc...
    They r raping the rake sickening!
  7.  
    Originally Posted by curiousgeorge77 View Post

    The freaking rake should be lower for ME events.
    They should make the rake a tier.
    Play 1 entry regular rake
    2 entry 50% off 2nd rake
    3 entry 50% off 2nd rake and 75% off 3rd rake etc...
    They r raping the rake sickening!

    true and ftp should also lmb
     
  8.  
    Originally Posted by Passiveplay View Post

    I'd love em up if HEM worked with them, until then I won't play em. But if they make an exisiting tourney MET should double the guarantee IMO.

    HEM released an upgrade and MET are supported now... i just upgraded myself yesterday

    http://forums.holdemmanager.com/203435-post7.html
  9. what are METs?
  10. Thanks I have been looking under the updates daily must have missed it.
     
  11. the thing i hate about MET's is that isntead of getting fucked once in a tourny, i know get fucked four times!
     
  12. The 4pm $10k turbo should be a met
  13. FGP.com

    Full Gimmick Poker

    nuff said!
     
  14. everything that struggles to reach guarantee will be converted to MET IMO. Midnight madness is perma MET I think.
  15.  
    Originally Posted by elendil View Post

    everything that struggles to reach guarantee will be converted to MET IMO. Midnight madness is perma MET I think.

    yeah i saw that, used to be the softest tourney on full tilt. shame they have to fuck everything up. how hard is it just to add more tourneys and make them ME instead of altering pre-existing ones. no-one will have an issue with more tourneys and it's surely the same rake for them if they just add a new ME tourney for everyone they were thinking of changing.
  16. if they didnt have a joke rng they would be great
  17. I don't play $40 MTT's so now I don't even bother firing one bullet on that thing(midnight madness).
  18. no such thing as 33$ ko yo
     1
  19.  
    Originally Posted by Passiveplay View Post

    I'd love em up if HEM worked with them, until then I won't play em. But if they make an exisiting tourney MET should double the guarantee IMO.


    mine works
  20.  
    Originally Posted by sprstoner View Post

    ftp should also lmb

    .
  21. they should not be taking rake on the 2nd+ entries.
     
  22.  
    Originally Posted by P0KERDUUDE View Post

    they should not be taking rake on the 2nd+ entries.

    What's the point for MET's then? In FTP's view

    So you think every tournament should just be a rebuy?
    Edited By: Appst08 Feb 14th, 2011 at 05:46 AM
     
  23. these things are the the worst idea in poker i've heard in a long time.

    the variance is higher and your edge is lower cause the average player entering 3+ times is a lot better than the average player entering once. horrible horrible idea.

    and it also takes money off the fish faster.

    seriously the worst idea ever in poker
    2
  24.  
    Originally Posted by mathclub View Post

    these things are the the worst idea in poker i've heard in a long time.

    the variance is higher and your edge is lower cause the average player entering 3+ times is a lot better than the average player entering once. horrible horrible idea.

    and it also takes money off the fish faster.

    seriously the worst idea ever in poker


    +1. please stop re-inventing the wheel FTP!
     
  25. tbh, now that i think about it, i like them. I have a wife and a kid and a full time job, so my schedule doesn't allow for me to play hardly at all. But it is nice to be able to log on and play 4 tourneys at my buy-in level that all start at the same time. I particularly like the 9pm $24+2 MET. obv they shouldn't all be switched to this format, but i like having the option.
    Edited By: MUPokerPlayer Feb 14th, 2011 at 07:16 AM
  26. doubt i ever play an ftops or anything special that is met again
     
  27.  
    Originally Posted by dude904 View Post

    doubt i ever play an ftops or anything special that is met again

    i played 0 FTOPS events today. i refuse to play any METs. i went over why i wasnt going to earlier but dont wanna get into it again
     
  28.  
    Originally Posted by Deoxyribo View Post

    i played 0 FTOPS events today. i refuse to play any METs. i went over why i wasnt going to earlier but dont wanna get into it again

    i played the 150r!
     
  29. i heard FTP runs sngs also for those who don't like the chance to win 500k playing a $322 buyin MTT
    12
  30. deoxyribo on not liking money
    3 

Similar Threads