Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
I had about 50 hands at the table when this bvb hand occurred, but nothing of note with villain. Villain was active on the table, but I really didn't have a solid read and did not recognize him. His OPR revealed winnings over 100k (ABI $37) but a low ROI. His name hints at being a vamoo but his country of origin was Scandanavian. He had a 100bb stack relatively early in a very well structured tournament. I felt comfortable putting him in the LAG category, with an emphasis on the agressive part.
[SIZE=3]pokerstars Game #58009129659: Tournament #407010577, $50+$5 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XIII (200/400) - 2011/02/20 18:25:46 ET[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Table '407010577 311' 9-max Seat #8 is the button[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Seat 1: s.l. halper (11921 in chips) [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Seat 2: nickname1985 (9478 in chips) [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Seat 3: Wontips (16893 in chips) [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Seat 4: F3dOrOv9191 (24020 in chips) [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Seat 5: WildCardWebs (5131 in chips) [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Seat 6: unarchj (21578 in chips) [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Seat 7: AJTTMAR (16477 in chips) [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Seat 8: JochenCash (13066 in chips) [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Seat 9: dirty.brasil (40545 in chips) [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]s.l. halper: posts the ante 50[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]nickname1985: posts the ante 50[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Wontips: posts the ante 50[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]F3dOrOv9191: posts the ante 50[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]WildCardWebs: posts the ante 50[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]unarchj: posts the ante 50[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]AJTTMAR: posts the ante 50[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]JochenCash: posts the ante 50[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]dirty.brasil: posts the ante 50[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]dirty.brasil: posts small blind 200[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]s.l. halper: posts big blind 400[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]*** HOLE CARDS ***[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Dealt to s.l. halper [9d Ad][/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]nickname1985: folds [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Wontips: folds [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]F3dOrOv9191: folds [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]WildCardWebs: folds [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]unarchj: folds [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]AJTTMAR: folds [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]JochenCash: folds [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]dirty.brasil: raises 600 to 1000[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]s.l. halper: calls 600[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]*** FLOP *** [Ah Th Tc][/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]dirty.brasil: bets 1300[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]s.l. halper: calls 1300[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]*** TURN *** [Ah Th Tc] [5s][/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]dirty.brasil: checks [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]s.l. halper: checks [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]*** RIVER *** [Ah Th Tc 5s] [Js][/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]dirty.brasil: checks [/SIZE]
s.l. halper: ?
Thoughts on all streets are welcome, and I'll give you my pertinent thoughts as well. Pre-flop, I felt more comfortable flatting in position than 3-betting because I did not want to either call a shove or fold to one. The flop is a standard flat spot to me, and I assumed that the check on the turn meant villain had some sort of showdown value or gave up so I really had no interest in betting the turn either. Villain's river check was surprising as I figured he'd grab at value even if he had worse and bluff if he had total air.
What is our river plan and why? Check behind? Bet and how much? Are we bet/folding or bet/calling? I mean I start the hand with less than 30 bigs but it is the DEG and its delicious combo of bad play and deep structure, so I'm not as willing to be risky as usual. -
i m shoving pre; the pot is about 1/6 of our stack, what are we waiting 4; its bvb
as played, i like flop and turn play and i bet river for 1/2 pot but honestly, i m lost if he check shoves river lol
i should prolly be folding to a check shove -
think u played it perfectly fine, now bet river, the thing is this is one of those spots where his range doesn't matter as much as your own range or much range the range he's assigning to you, your hand either looks like a pp or a weak A, if he has a strong hand here he will never check the river to you because it just looks so much like you will check here most of the time
-
3b call pre.
Edited By: apology7 Feb 27th, 2011 at 08:15 PM
as played value bet river
btw nvr folding river if he check jams here -
Appreciate the responses so far. Bump for additional thoughts on the river. Check jam? You bet he did.
[SIZE=3]*** RIVER *** [Ah Th Tc 5s] [Js][/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]dirty.brasil: checks [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]s.l. halper: bets 2400[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]dirty.brasil: raises 35795 to 38195 and is all-in[/SIZE]
s.l. halper: -
I'm not apology but I guess it's for the reasons I stated, the way the hand went he can't expect you to bet here (at least often enought) so he will almost never have a hand here that he's c/jamming for value, most likely some kinda pair that he's now turning into a bluff
Edited By: eDaN Feb 28th, 2011 at 01:08 PM
he might have KQ -
I'm not folding because the line he took doesn't make any sense for someone trying to get value from his hand.
Suppose he has an ace. It's understandable that he checks the turn for pot control. If he has a weak ace he will likely even check the river. AQ, AK type hands likely lead the river for value but they never check raise on a paired board.
If villain flopped a 10 I see no reason why he would check back the turn when it's now likely that your range includes an ace. If he does check the turn for deception he should be value betting the river because a ton of your range checks behind for showdown.
IMO, the only made hand that makes sense given his actions is pocket jacks. He should still be value betting the river hear because often times you will be checking behind weak aces and he has no reason to believe you will call a check-raise.
I really feel like villain is just spazzing trying to push you off of something because you have shown little strength throughout the hand. In his mind you virtually never check behind trips on the turn and your river value bet could just mean top pair or busted flush draw.
I could very well be wrong, and I'm not thrilled to get it in because I do think he may show up with a full house or trips a decent amount of the time - but I don't think it's enough of the time for me to lay down my hand to such an odd and polarized line. Plus, he's from Brazil. -
Well, If it was me in this hand instead of villain... I know you have a hand w/ value when you check back the turn, so I'm like 99% sure you will bet the river for value If I check the river. So if I had a nut type hand I would always check/jam the river here, especially when I have a really aggro image. W/ this image I never expect you to fold an ace to a check jam. If I have a tight image I take a different line though.
Edited By: Steve Murkle Feb 28th, 2011 at 03:39 PM
Considering Villain is a winning player means he has some understanding of the game. I don't like bet/fold because it is possible he turns certain hands into bluffs but I can't really fathom that he expects you to fold an ace. -
This was a pretty surprising result.
First, I do play this much faster in a typical small/midstakes tourney. I'm 3-bet/calling against this type of villain and never giving it a second thought. However the Sunday DEG plays like an FTOPS/SCOOP type tourney and I played it conservatively and don't mind disagreeing about it.
Otherwise, I saw it almost identically to Apology (thanks for spending the time man). I never expected villain to play a better ace this oddly and would be shocked if villain ever tabled a ten or better. So I bet intending to call shove and snapcalled when he did...
[SIZE=3]*** RIVER *** [Ah Th Tc 5s] [Js][/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]dirty.brasil: checks [/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]s.l. halper: bets 2400[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]dirty.brasil: raises 35795 to 38195 and is all-in[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]s.l. halper: calls 7171 and is all-in[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Uncalled bet (28624) returned to dirty.brasil[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]*** SHOW DOWN ***[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]dirty.brasil: shows [Ts Kh] (three of a kind, Tens)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]s.l. halper: shows [9d Ad] (two pair, Aces and Tens)[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]dirty.brasil collected 24192 from pot[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]s.l. halper finished the tournament in 1650th place[/SIZE]
oops....:)
Thx again for the responses. -
you played it fine...bet the river now
seems like a real easy fold if he jams...idk how people can say call here. i mean, his line is odd...but 99.9% of people never have one bluff in their range here
you could 3b/call pre if you think the guy's gonna tool...flatting is fine too
Gags30 is an instructor at PocketFives Training . To get more of his advice and to watch his training videos, click here.
-
appreciate the great explanation. def makes a lot of sense. i only asked tho, because i just usually dont give randoms enough credit here to use the same kinda thought process that u discussed. i feel like therss a very small percentage of players out there who are willing to risk their whole stack on a bluff here and most likely is just some trappy random. very interesting yet common spot tho, surprised not to see more discusion
Originally Posted by apology7
I'm not folding because the line he took doesn't make any sense for someone trying to get value from his hand.
Suppose he has an ace. It's understandable that he checks the turn for pot control. If he has a weak ace he will likely even check the river. AQ, AK type hands likely lead the river for value but they never check raise on a paired board.
If villain flopped a 10 I see no reason why he would check back the turn when it's now likely that your range includes an ace. If he does check the turn for deception he should be value betting the river because a ton of your range checks behind for showdown.
IMO, the only made hand that makes sense given his actions is pocket jacks. He should still be value betting the river hear because often times you will be checking behind weak aces and he has no reason to believe you will call a check-raise.
I really feel like villain is just spazzing trying to push you off of something because you have shown little strength throughout the hand. In his mind you virtually never check behind trips on the turn and your river value bet could just mean top pair or busted flush draw.
I could very well be wrong, and I'm not thrilled to get it in because I do think he may show up with a full house or trips a decent amount of the time - but I don't think it's enough of the time for me to lay down my hand to such an odd and polarized line. Plus, he's from Brazil.
im with this guyOriginally Posted by Gags30
you played it fine...bet the river now
seems like a real easy fold if he jams...idk how people can say call here. i mean, his line is odd...but 99.9% of people never have one bluff in their range here
you could 3b/call pre if you think the guy's gonna tool...flatting is fine too -
Edited By: Steve Murkle Mar 1st, 2011 at 07:09 AMI feel the exact opposite, almost all of S.L.'s value range is betting the river after calling the flop and checking back the turn (Either an Ace, 10, or air). This should be obvious and some winning villains would know this. In all likely hood, villain knows that his only chance of getting max value with nut type hands (S.L.'s other ~8k in chips behind) here is by c/j.Originally Posted by apology7
I'm not folding because the line he took doesn't make any sense for someone trying to get value from his hand.
Suppose he has an ace. It's understandable that he checks the turn for pot control. If he has a weak ace he will likely even check the river. AQ, AK type hands likely lead the river for value but they never check raise on a paired board.
If villain flopped a 10 I see no reason why he would check back the turn when it's now likely that your range includes an ace. If he does check the turn for deception he should be value betting the river because a ton of your range checks behind for showdown.
If he does lead the river he only profits equal to what he bets (S.L. never shoves worse). However, if he check jams either A. S.L. folds and villain makes the same chips if he would have led the river or B. S.L. calls and he gets it all.
Seems more profitable to c/s river from villains standpoint than to bet the river.
As played he never check shoves any ace or bluffs imo because he never expects you not to have an ace or a hand with value from the way you played it
Similar Threads
-
30 Replies
Sick spot on the river at the FT of the $75 24k on Sunday
By nadler in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jul 21st, 2010, 04:49 PM -
4 Replies
I hate Sunday part 2- 20c river decision
By s.l. halper in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jan 31st, 2010, 11:52 PM - 8 Replies
- 4 Replies
-
27 Replies
River spot in the Sunday 500
By NeverScaredB in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Oct 21st, 2008, 03:26 PM










