Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Somewhat interesting article in the New York Times on poker bots.
Edited By: tyson219 Mar 14th, 2011 at 05:01 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/sc....html?src=recg
Sorry if this is a repost. -
It truly is a horrible article.
-
surprise surprise
(Full Tilt did not respond to requests for comment.)
-
Hint: You don't need to spot them to beat them easily.
-
gosh that article sucks
the most tilting part was "(Internet gambling is illegal in the United States, but online casinos operate offshore.)" -
if u cant beat a machine that plays every spot the same way u suck
-
lol, is this some new multi million dollar bot that can adjust, they are coded to act a certain way they dont think on their own
Edited By: MakeMeMaster Mar 15th, 2011 at 01:39 AM -
Bots are extremely profitable...for the guys selling them at $129 a pop...
-
This is just another case for keeping online poker illegal. Bots should be banned and so should the people using them. I hope they keep cracking those individuals that are harming our game.
-
i think theyre GREAT for everyone! a bot cant determine you fold most of the times someone 3bets you.. it cant determine if you often fold to a reraise on your flop continuance bet... or that you fold to a continuance in a 3bet pot more often than not.. or that you limp alot of hands and usually just fold if anyone raises.. i mean i dont know about the rest of you guys but id rather play against bots than skilled players anytime.. just sayin... i know its a losing arguement and in the end everyone will agree that bots are terrible for the game.... but damn id be rich if i just played bots.... cause they know how to fold! lmao
-
yes it can...
Originally Posted by daddywarduxx
i think theyre GREAT for everyone! a bot cant determine you fold most of the times someone 3bets you.. it cant determine if you often fold to a reraise on your flop continuance bet... or that you fold to a continuance in a 3bet pot more often than not.. or that you limp alot of hands and usually just fold if anyone raises.. i mean i dont know about the rest of you guys but id rather play against bots than skilled players anytime.. just sayin... i know its a losing arguement and in the end everyone will agree that bots are terrible for the game.... but damn id be rich if i just played bots.... cause they know how to fold! lmao
not saying i disagree with your overall point, but a well programmed bot can/should also read HH's to develop stats to use in algorithm's to find "the most profitable" move. emphasis on well programmed, im sure theres mostly crap out there -
Gold. If only those fools folded to my continuance bets I'd be riiiiiiiiiiiiich.
Originally Posted by daddywarduxx
i think theyre GREAT for everyone! a bot cant determine you fold most of the times someone 3bets you.. it cant determine if you often fold to a reraise on your flop continuance bet... or that you fold to a continuance in a 3bet pot more often than not.. or that you limp alot of hands and usually just fold if anyone raises.. i mean i dont know about the rest of you guys but id rather play against bots than skilled players anytime.. just sayin... i know its a losing arguement and in the end everyone will agree that bots are terrible for the game.... but damn id be rich if i just played bots.... cause they know how to fold! lmao
Similar Threads
-
3 Replies
Poker bots raise the stakes for human players (article)
By MadProfesor in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Nov 28th, 2008, 06:38 PM - 9 Replies
-
25 Replies
Why poker bots are NOT chess bots...
By supermoves in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Nov 27th, 2006, 06:19 PM - 0 Replies










