[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
I never play Omaha8 so I'm trying to figure out this hand. In retrospect I don't think I played it very well, but I need someone who actually understands this game to tell me if this is just one of those hands that play themselves, or if I screwed the pooch and messed it up. Is badkittyx3's call a good one?
Thanks.
pokerstars Game #12750169104: Tournament #64706999, $3.00+$0.40 Omaha Hi/Lo Pot Limit - Level VII (150/300) - 2007/10/20 - 22:50:00 (ET)
Table '64706999 1' 10-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 4: care4bear42 (3942 in chips)
Seat 6: badkittyX3 (5318 in chips)
Seat 7: platypus22 (4291 in chips)
Seat 8: dbcoyotes (1449 in chips)
dbcoyotes: posts small blind 150
care4bear42: posts big blind 300
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to platypus22 [Kd Ac Ad Js]
badkittyX3: raises 750 to 1050
platypus22: raises 2550 to 3600
dbcoyotes: folds
care4bear42: folds
badkittyX3: raises 1718 to 5318 and is all-in
platypus22: calls 691 and is all-in
*** FLOP *** [2d 9h Qh]
*** TURN *** [2d 9h Qh] [4h]
*** RIVER *** [2d 9h Qh 4h] [Qd]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
badkittyX3: shows [6s 2h 4s Ah] (HI: a flush, Ace high)
platypus22: shows [Kd Ac Ad Js] (HI: two pair, Aces and Queens)
badkittyX3 collected 9032 from pot
No low hand qualified
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 9032 | Rake 0
Board [2d 9h Qh 4h Qd]
Seat 4: care4bear42 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: badkittyX3 showed [6s 2h 4s Ah] and won (9032) with HI: a flush, Ace high
Seat 7: platypus22 (button) showed [Kd Ac Ad Js] and lost with HI: two pair, Aces and Queens
Seat 8: dbcoyotes (small blind) folded before Flop -
You both had great hands 4 handed, shit happens, can't fault either one of you.
-
Honestly I don't know. I've played some O8b live, but it's always been limit. I should read a book on PL/NL omaha8 I guess.
-
From my very limited Omaha8 experience, Kitty's call is loose but not horrible....she's double suited with high and low possibilities....you are pushing this with only the high end covered....omaha8 is a tough game....i don't play it much and that is why I say "gank owns" when anybody rips his game...to win a wsop bracelet in this game is CRAZY!!!!
-
Id rather see a flop with this high only hand. i might even fold it to a raise....i dont really want to be in a HU pot with a 1 way hand.......if you had a smaller stack, lower M then its well worth the shot but here its pretty iffy ....and im pretty positive i wouldnt reraise with it HU.
-
Good point. Thanks for the input!
-
Ummm it sounds like im in the miniority, but I think I fold there. There are times when I will reraise, but I think with the large stack making that raise adds to the decision. Your hand is ahead such a high % of the time, I dont hate the reraise. In O8 If your hand holds up as the best high hand, you still have to have there be no qualifying low to avoid a chop. Whether Im Flamed or not, I think I fold in that spot.
-
***WARNING! SOME OF THE ABOVE ADVICE IS VERY BAD!!!***
Reraise is a terrible play on the bubble of a SNG!
DO NOT RERAISE!!!
Should you fold, your equity in this SNG is $8.56:
<TABLE border=1><TBODY><TR><TH>Player</TH><TH>Chips</TH><TH>Prob 1st</TH><TH>Prob 2nd</TH><TH>Prob 3rd</TH><TH>Equity</TH></TR><TR class=oddrow><TD>You
</TD><TD>4291</TD><TD>0.2861</TD><TD>0.2897</TD><TD>0.2777</TD><TD>$8.56</TD></TR><TR class=evenrow><TD>Player 2
</TD><TD>5318</TD><TD>0.3545</TD><TD>0.3064</TD><TD>0.2373</TD><TD>$9.50</TD></TR><TR class=oddrow><TD>Player 3
</TD><TD>3942</TD><TD>0.2628</TD><TD>0.2777</TD><TD>0.2918</TD><TD>$8.19</TD></TR><TR class=evenrow><TD>Player 4
</TD><TD>1449</TD><TD>0.0966</TD><TD>0.1262</TD><TD>0.1931</TD><TD>$3.74</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Obviously, should you reraise and go on to lose the hand, your equity is zero.
Should you go on to win the hand, your equity becomes $11.95:
<TABLE border=1><TBODY><TR><TH>Player</TH><TH>Chips</TH><TH>Prob 1st</TH><TH>Prob 2nd</TH><TH>Prob 3rd</TH><TH>Equity</TH></TR><TR class=oddrow><TD>You
</TD><TD>8582</TD><TD>0.5704</TD><TD>0.3071</TD><TD>0.1044</TD><TD>$11.95</TD></TR><TR class=evenrow><TD>Player 2
</TD><TD>1073</TD><TD>0.0713</TD><TD>0.1276</TD><TD>0.2814</TD><TD>$3.91</TD></TR><TR class=oddrow><TD>Player 3
</TD><TD>3942</TD><TD>0.2620</TD><TD>0.3959</TD><TD>0.2543</TD><TD>$9.02</TD></TR><TR class=evenrow><TD>Player 4
</TD><TD>1449</TD><TD>0.0963</TD><TD>0.1694</TD><TD>0.3600</TD><TD>$5.13</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Therefore, you are risking $8.56 to win $3.39. In order to make up for that difference, you must win this hand, should you reraise, 71.63% of the time!!!
You should not even raise the BEST POSSIBLE starting hand, AA23 double suited here (unless you were POSITIVE he was raising any 4 cards, and even then, it's quite a marginal shove that gains you a very small bit of equity!!!):
<TABLE class=pptSimTable cellSpacing=0 border=1><TBODY><TR class=pptSimLabels><TH>Hand</TH><TH>Pot equity</TH><TH>Scoops</TH><TH>Wins Hi</TH><TH>Ties Hi</TH><TH>Wins Lo</TH><TH>Ties Lo</TH></TR><TR class=oddrow><TD class=pptSpec>AdAs2d3s</TD><TD class=pptEV>72.54%</TD><TD class=pptScoops>368,728</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>400,772</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>3,612</TD><TD class=pptWinsLo>264,360</TD><TD class=pptTiesLo>12,711</TD></TR><TR class=evenrow><TD class=pptSpec>****</TD><TD class=pptEV>27.46%</TD><TD class=pptScoops>102,215</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>195,616</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>3,612</TD><TD class=pptWinsLo>29,669</TD><TD class=pptTiesLo>12,711</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Your actual hand vs any 4:
<TABLE class=pptSimTable cellSpacing=0 border=1><TBODY><TR class=pptSimLabels><TH>Hand</TH><TH>Pot equity</TH><TH>Scoops</TH><TH>Wins Hi</TH><TH>Ties Hi</TH><TH>Wins Lo</TH><TH>Ties Lo</TH></TR><TR class=oddrow><TD class=pptSpec>KdAcAdJs</TD><TD class=pptEV>55.03%</TD><TD class=pptScoops>261,276</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>395,257</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>4,312</TD><TD class=pptWinsLo>0</TD><TD class=pptTiesLo>0</TD></TR><TR class=evenrow><TD class=pptSpec>****</TD><TD class=pptEV>44.97%</TD><TD class=pptScoops>200,431</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>200,431</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>4,312</TD><TD class=pptWinsLo>215,270</TD><TD class=pptTiesLo>0</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Your actual hand vs. top 50% of hands:
<TABLE class=pptSimTable cellSpacing=0 border=1><TBODY><TR class=pptSimLabels><TH>Hand</TH><TH>Pot equity</TH><TH>Scoops</TH><TH>Wins Hi</TH><TH>Ties Hi</TH><TH>Wins Lo</TH><TH>Ties Lo</TH></TR><TR class=oddrow><TD class=pptSpec>KdAcAdJs</TD><TD class=pptEV>52.55%</TD><TD class=pptScoops>234,499</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>389,587</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>7,488</TD><TD class=pptWinsLo>0</TD><TD class=pptTiesLo>0</TD></TR><TR class=evenrow><TD class=pptSpec>50%</TD><TD class=pptEV>47.45%</TD><TD class=pptScoops>202,925</TD><TD class=pptWinsHi>202,925</TD><TD class=pptTiesHi>7,488</TD><TD class=pptWinsLo>260,218</TD><TD class=pptTiesLo>0</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
...as you can see, you are in deep shit vs. the 71.63% you need. INSTAMUCK this hand!!!!! Calling wouldn't be horrible, but I dislike it here.
For more information check out this article:
Advanced SNG bubble play using ICM
Badkitty's call was ok.
Hope that helps!
Jen -
I still can't find where Kitty calls anything. Looks like a raise and a re-raise ai
-
This is a $3.40 SNG, so the chances of Kitty folding are equivilent to the chances of Frosty the Snowman taking an August stroll thru downtown hell and walking away intact!
Reraise is bad here, see my post below for why. -
Pocket aces can be extremely overvalued in this game. Even if you hit one on flop you better boat up and if you do that a wicked small percentage of the time you better watch out for quads lol.
If you have them with deuce three double suited then get excited. In this case after the turn(although you were ahead at the time) you were on a shitty low draw with your ace six. You were also on a straight draw with flush draw on board.
The wisest Omaha tip I ever heard was if your betting and raising then have the nuts with redraws to the nuts. -
Careful, even reraising AA23 double suited here is a bad play on a SNG bubble. I would call and see what the flop brought. See my post above for why.
-
Ya that makes a lot of sense. I usually play cash games as opposed to tourneys. In cash games I think it is silly to raise preflop a lot of the time. Obviously it depends on situation. But seeing a flop cheaply and going forward from there usually works for me. HI LO is a better game for me because it is so much more forgiving lol.
-
Jennifear....as usual you provide the super well thought out answer. Thanks. That makes perfect sense!
-
In a cash game, platy's hand is marginal, and I like your call, especially since you can put postflop pressure on flops that contain only low draws, which are a lot in this instance!
-
NP Platy!
I was afraid that many others didn't either see that it was a SNG bubble, or that they weren't aware of the cEV/$EV implications, or possibly both.
Glad I could help!
Jen -
Hello Jennifear.
Though I find it very educational and frequently correct to follow, I think sometimes (here, for example) ICM can lead us astray.
Both players played this fine. I think Platypus' reraise was good. If he's folding aces to every raise of the big stack then he's going to get chipped away so far down as to make winning this very difficult. When I'm big stack in a situation like the above one, I'm raising 50%+ of my hands, because I know no hand in O8 is that big of a dog. However, because of that aggression it becomes absolutely necessary for the other players, even those with medium stacks, to take a stand. If they don't the big stack will cruise to victory.
Platypus' hand is a favorite against any other hand, save AA-low-x, and is also very difficult to play on the flop in this situation. Therefore, his best option is to raise. He does have some fold equity, especially if the big stack is raising with most hands, and is also the favorite to be the big stack himself should he be called, at which point he could be the bullier who would likely cruise to victory.
Summary: Folding pre- is not an option due to the opener's wide range. Calling 25% of stack with a hand that is very difficult to play post- is not an option. Given hand is a favorite, therefore...push. Well played Platypus, unlucky here blah blah blah, make the same play next time. -
"If he's folding aces to every raise of the big stack then he's going to get chipped away so far down as to make winning this very difficult"
Winning is not his priority here. It's cashing. That's the reasoning behind the math. Reraise is very terrible here, because if you fold, your chances of cashing are very high.
"Platypus' hand is a favorite against any other hand, save AA-low-x, and is also very difficult to play on the flop in this situation."
This is not true at all. In Omaha 8/b, aces are a good hand, but not a premium one. Platy's hand is a marginal favorite at best over most hands in the raiser's range. As seen in my post, platy's hand is about 53-47 over a range as wide of 50% of all hands.
Taking a stand here is about a $4 error, which is a critical mistake in a $3.40 SNG.
Folding pre is the most profitable option, and it's not close.
To put things in NLH terms, reraising here is akin to calling an allin with A-10 on the bubble with the same stacks. -
"Platypus' hand is a favorite against any other hand, save AA-low-x, and is also very difficult to play on the flop in this situation."
This is not true at all.
I shouldn't post after my third glass. You are absolutely correct that I am incorrect here...
However...I stand by my original assertion that a stand must be taken. If the only hand that is >71% is AA23ds then the big stack can open raise any four until the cows come home, which greatly skews the equity numbers in your ICM calculation because they are based on current chips vs. total chips and prize pool. This is similar to the QQ NLH hand from a couple days ago... If the calling or re-raising requirements are so stringent so as to not likely arise with the relatively few remaining hands left in the tournament, then the likelihood of Platypus taking down first is much much much lower than the ICM represents.
Edit: I do stand by this, though perhaps all the winner-take-all satellites I've been playing on FTP lately are affecting me. -
This formula was made for games where almost all hands have one winner. There needs to be some sort of adjustment to the tables here for PLO8. Most hands chop and in your tables you are only using pot equity. You are saying that he only survives about 52.55% which is not true. He actually survives about 66%. It has to make a difference in the computations. I am not exactly sure how.
Matty and myself have played a ton of these games and there is no way that hand can be folded. If there is any game out there that you can come back from a micro stack of say 30 chips and blinds at 200/400, it is this one. If you are folding this hand you will end up in more trouble bubbling because the short stack may make it through the blinds a couple of times or more. -
Trust me doc, there's no way you can do anything BUT fold that hand. I used pot equity for simplicity sake. You are right that his survival rate is higher, but 66% won't cut it here either. If you'd like to do the math regarding survival rates as opposed to pot equity, you'll find he needs to survive more than 80% of the time to make this call.
This is the bubble! It doesn't matter if it's NLH or PLO8B, the fact remains that second place needs to play UBER-tight against the big stack's shove. The only player who will benefit substantially from this confrontation is shorty.
Note: This is BARELY a shove in a game where cEV is the only factor. You have a good hand, against a raise, with two players left to act. You have about 53% pot equity against his range. That makes it a small favorite!
Using your math, if you die 1/3 of the time, you lose $8.56 in equity 1/3 of the time. Even if you outright won the whole pot EVERY OTHER time you survived (which you wouldn't), and won $3.39 2/3 of the time, you don't make up for that.
I reiterate, this is not a close decision. This is a clear fold. -
"You should not even raise the BEST POSSIBLE starting hand, AA23 double suited here (unless you were POSITIVE he was raising any 4 cards, and even then, it's quite a marginal shove that gains you a very small bit of equity!!!)"
Ugh. I don't care what the maths says I'm still never passing this hand in a non-sat tourney. F bubbling. -
Hiya DJam21 :)
Always hate playing with ya on FTP (take that as a compliment!)
If that's your line of thinking, please look over this thread, you won't regret it!
http://www.pocketfives.com/1396BB6C-...B958B48BE.aspx -
Careful, even reraising AA23 double suited here is a bad play on a SNG bubble?
why exactly, is that sarcasm? -
Jennifear, all your ICM analysis is of course correct.
HOWEVER, I don't agree when you say that badkittyX3 will never ever fold to a reraise here. Come on! If you have 5300 and somebody re-pots it, essentially putting themselves all in for about 75% of your stack, on the sng bubble with a 5bb stack around, you gotta have something good to call!
BUT, even with let's say 50% folds from badkittyX3, it might be -$EV, so folding might still be correct...
I just don't think it's good to say somebody never folds to a reraise, even in a $3 game. He should be just afraid of bubbling as you. What if he raised "any four" just to steal some blinds, trying to bully the table?
.mbardsen -
He could have raised any four, but how many $3.40 players really know anything about ICM, let alone what those 3 letters stand for. Most of the players at this level are thinking either, "don't screw up, make the money" or "I have pot odds, I call." I've played enough of these to know that a raise and fold in the same betting round is rare at this point of the game. People just think they are never that far behind in o8b so they call. Seriously, this player will call about 95-97% of the time here.
-
Read the above post and it will make more sense.
-
You are correct that the reraise is going to get called in a $3 sng. That reraise gets called about 90% of the time in $50-60 that I play. There is no fold equity on this hand to consider here. I also agree that the shorty does benefit.
Believe me I understand how good/bad AA(high)(high) is in this game. Especially post flop.
I understand how ICM works and do use that type of thinking for NLH games. It doesn't work nearly as well for PLO8 unless someone is very short stacked.
Generally I am an O8 specialist playing at the highest levels online for tournaments (limit and pot limit) and sngs (pot limit).
My question is how do you get your $8.56 in equity if the rest of the bubble you are not going to play a hand? This game plays so much different than a NLH game. Someone with 30 chips and blinds of 150/300 is very rarely going to get through the blinds in NLH. In PLO8 with the split pots it is much easier. I am not going to go so far as to say it is likely, but definately not uncommon at all. If I play UBER-tight I would end up losing way too many blinds to end with a $8.56 equity when the bubble breaks. The short stack has a whole lot easier time of staying alive with all of the chopped pots that occur and the fact that they are almost never worse than a 60-40 dog in any hand.
My experience is that it doesn't work for PLO8 the same way as NLH. I have tried it and had horrible results with it. I did it for long enough it should have evened out and it didn't get better. The problem was that the bubble would last so long so often that I would end of as the short stack almost every time. Then I would be forced to play weaker hands. Sure I could stick around for awhile like the other short stacks, but if I did make it I would usually finish in 3rd.
The math needs to be changed somehow to reflect the split pots.
Doc
Similar Threads
-
0 Replies
Guidance and tips on managing the big stack please!!
By creg27 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Nov 23rd, 2007, 07:23 AM - 0 Replies
- 1 Replies
-
2 Replies
Some Guidance Please (Hand Histories Included)
By oasisnutt in Poker Discussion
Last Post: May 10th, 2006, 03:05 PM - 1 Replies










