[x]
  1. I was just in the 50r and lost a 50 bb pot with a flush draw and one over allin on the flop. After the hand i have 13 bbs in the hijack or hijack minus 1. I looked up right after the hand and DonkeyWrenn was in the big blind sitting out, i figured it was a good spot to shove. Im playing a good amount of tables so i made the mistake of not looking over at him in the bb before i shoved. So i shove and the guy behind me snap reraises with a good stack behind. Then i look up and all of the sudden donkey wrenn is sitting in again. At this point i realized what was going on that if he called and had a hand he was enducing my shove by sitting out, which is a blatant angle. Id like to hear what everyone thinks about this and whether or nut they think it is ethical to do. BTW he called and obv had a hand in 99 and won vs my K8 and AQo slash obv.
     2
  2. He was probably just taking a piss, lose the foil hat.
     
  3. heres HH for u

    pokerstars Game #19694609558: Tournament #100869344, $50+$5 Hold'em No Limit - Level XII (500/1000) - 2008/08/17 - 18:19:08 (ET)
    Table '100869344 39' 9-max Seat #8 is the button
    Seat 1: DonkeyWrenn (16813 in chips) is sitting out
    Seat 2: KtheKing (51532 in chips)
    Seat 3: bradb_rad12 (40024 in chips)
    Seat 4: CPT CRUX (6539 in chips)
    Seat 5: A6540 (26814 in chips)
    Seat 6: QTgirlE3 (11419 in chips)
    Seat 7: Tmay420 (13462 in chips)
    Seat 8: My Brim Low (72568 in chips)
    Seat 9: bEatNicK"OG" (53294 in chips)
    DonkeyWrenn: posts the ante 100
    KtheKing: posts the ante 100
    bradb_rad12: posts the ante 100
    CPT CRUX: posts the ante 100
    A6540: posts the ante 100
    QTgirlE3: posts the ante 100
    Tmay420: posts the ante 100
    My Brim Low: posts the ante 100
    bEatNicK"OG": posts the ante 100
    bEatNicK"OG": posts small blind 500
    DonkeyWrenn: posts big blind 1000
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to QTgirlE3 [Js 5c]
    KtheKing: folds
    bradb_rad12: folds
    CPT CRUX: folds
    A6540: folds
    DonkeyWrenn has returned
    QTgirlE3: folds
    Tmay420: raises 12362 to 13362 and is all-in
    My Brim Low: raises 12362 to 25724
    bEatNicK"OG": folds
    DonkeyWrenn: calls 15713 and is all-in
    Uncalled bet (9011) returned to My Brim Low
    *** FLOP *** [Tc Qh 9s]
    *** TURN *** [Tc Qh 9s] [Qc]
    *** RIVER *** [Tc Qh 9s Qc] [8h]
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    DonkeyWrenn: shows [9d 9c] (a full house, Nines full of Queens)
    My Brim Low: shows [Ac Qd] (three of a kind, Queens)
    DonkeyWrenn collected 6702 from side pot
    Tmay420: shows [8c Kh] (two pair, Queens and Eights)
    DonkeyWrenn collected 41486 from main pot
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 48188 Main pot 41486. Side pot 6702. | Rake 0
    Board [Tc Qh 9s Qc 8h]
    Seat 1: DonkeyWrenn (big blind) showed [9d 9c] and won (48188) with a full house, Nines full of Queens
    Seat 2: KtheKing folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 3: bradb_rad12 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 4: CPT CRUX folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 5: A6540 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 6: QTgirlE3 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 7: Tmay420 showed [8c Kh] and lost with two pair, Queens and Eights
    Seat 8: My Brim Low (button) showed [Ac Qd] and lost with three of a kind, Queens
    Seat 9: bEatNicK"OG" (small blind) folded before Flop
  4. def fine

    u got owned
     
  5. Oh please, for god's sake, you have no proof that this is 'blatant angle shooting'.

    edit: He sat back in BEFORE you shoved. What is your problem?
     
  6. it is possible that he temporarily disconnected.

    but excluding this possibility, i don't think its any more of an angle shoot than someone shoving on a player just bc he's sitting out (which i obv do btw).
  7. lol, this is not 'angle shooting'
    im pretty sure most top players like donkeywrenn are playing way too many tables to try and sitout/trap someone with a measly pair of nines. im sure he was just taking a leak or whatever and came back to see he had nines. it happens all the time to me
  8. Oh please, everyone else who posted agreed that you have nothing to be concerned with here. Nothing illegal, nothing unethical.

    Don't ask a question if you don't want to hear the answer.
     
  9. it depends on intention. If he actually did that to trap someone, then ya its an angle shoot and unethical.
     
  10. Well intention obv can't be known. But the fact that he only had 99 and sat back in well before Tmay shoved, certainly doesn't seem to give any weight to the theory that he was being intentionally deceptive.
     
  11. I have thought about this on those occasions when someone is sitting out and returning over and over.

    I have wondered whether they were trying to induce a raise or shove so I end up just watching carefully until it is my turn to act.

    If people are doing this, I think its pretty shitty but I guess you just have to play it as it comes, if he's sitting out when its your turn to act go for it. If he sits back in do what you have to do.
  12.  
    Originally Posted by charder View Post


    it depends on intention. If he actually did that to trap someone, then ya its an angle shoot and unethical.

    is it any more unethical than the universally accepted practice of shoving on him just because you think he is disconnected?
  13.  
    Originally Posted by MUPokerPlayer View Post

     
    Originally Posted by charder View Post


    it depends on intention. If he actually did that to trap someone, then ya its an angle shoot and unethical.

    is it any more unethical than the universal practice of shoving on him just because you think he is disconnected?

    LOL QFT
  14.  
    Originally Posted by MUPokerPlayer View Post

     
    Originally Posted by charder View Post


    it depends on intention. If he actually did that to trap someone, then ya its an angle shoot and unethical.

    is it any more unethical than the universal practice of shoving on him just because you think he is disconnected?

    Nothing unethical about raising a BB sitting out or acting as if he's out. In a live game if he's not there, his hand is already folded.
  15. ya srsly u shove on him light because u think hes sitting out and then get mad when he "angles u" and rly is there and takes ur chips

    u had this coming, maybe next time shove if u have a hand not becus u think the bb isnt there
     
  16. make a note on him not to consider the shove in the future in similar spot lol
  17.  
    Originally Posted by AGame18 View Post

    ya srsly u shove on him light because u think hes sitting out and then get mad when he "angles u" and rly is there and takes ur chips

    u had this coming, maybe next time shove if u have a hand not becus u think the bb isnt there

    LOL u cant be serious agame
  18. Wait until you run bad for 2 years Tim.
     
  19. It's online poker... no more angle shooting than blinding someone out when then they disconnect. Either one sucks, and maybe you don't do it to a friend, but it comes with the territory in this game.
     
  20. lol at this post
  21. On the scale of questionable things done by players online - this is about a 2 (with 10 being potripper). If it even was an angle.
     
  22. agame i really hope your joking, this is a good topic, i think that its a good rule that if your sitting out to start the hand, u cant sit down in the middle of the hand
     
  23.  
    Originally Posted by number1pen View Post

    agame i really hope your joking, this is a good topic, i think that its a good rule that if your sitting out to start the hand, u cant sit down in the middle of the hand

    Once again, in live play your hand is folded once the last card is dealt if you are not at your seat. People should not have to act while they are guessing if you are going to return or not. It changes the game.

    This is a very good post and raises the valid issue of whether a hand should be folded if the player is not sitting in upon the completion of the deal.

    It would resolve the issue of raising blinds of those sitting out and those sitting out to gain advantage agaiinst those who might raise their blind.
  24.  
    Originally Posted by MUPokerPlayer View Post

     
    Originally Posted by charder View Post


    it depends on intention. If he actually did that to trap someone, then ya its an angle shoot and unethical.

    is it any more unethical than the universally accepted practice of shoving on him just because you think he is disconnected?

    What a childish original post. Your angle shooting b/c the guy is sittin out THEN bitchin that you got OUT ANGLED? I think the play is smart, but I dont utilize it.

    AT LEAST the guy is thinking...
  25. if people think its an issue, then they should start a petition to have stars and other sites change their software
  26.  
    Originally Posted by Willywoo View Post

     
    Originally Posted by number1pen View Post

    agame i really hope your joking, this is a good topic, i think that its a good rule that if your sitting out to start the hand, u cant sit down in the middle of the hand

    Once again, in live play your hand is folded once the last card is dealt if you are not at your seat. People should not have to act while they are guessing if you are going to return or not. It changes the game.

    This is a very good post and raises the valid issue of whether a hand should be folded if the player is not sitting in upon the completion of the deal.

    It would resolve the issue of raising blinds of those sitting out and those sitting out to gain advantage agaiinst those who might raise their blind.

    yeah, but this isnt live poker. its ONLINE poker. it is different, and this is one of the differences. sorry tmay, this is a dumb post
    1
  27. <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td> Willywoo:</td><td></td></tr></table><blockquote><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td> number1pen:</td><td></td></tr></table>
    agame i really hope your joking, this is a good topic, i think that its a good rule that if your sitting out to start the hand, u cant sit down in the middle of the hand

    </blockquote>

    Once again, in live play your hand is folded once the last card is dealt if you are not at your seat. People should not have to act while they are guessing if you are going to return or not. It changes the game.

    This is a very good post and raises the valid issue of whether a hand should be folded if the player is not sitting in upon the completion of the deal.

    It would resolve the issue of raising blinds of those sitting out and those sitting out to gain advantage agaiinst those who might raise their blind.

    ---------------------------------------------------

    I thought in live play as long as you get back to your seat b4 your turn to act, then you can play the hand?
  28. what if all the players in between you 2 had "fold" clicked ???? he wouldnt even have enough time to sit back in to play his "monster"... ???
     
  29. Not an angle shoot IMO. Perhaps he had to go the bathroom, maybe a phone call. Who knows? Too many possibilities to call this an outright angle shoot. You decided to shove on him light because he wasn't there, and then when he returns to rightfully play his hand you complain because he didn't sit out like you planned. You simply got the cookie jar lid slammed on your fingers.
  30.  
    Originally Posted by tcstunna View Post

     
    Originally Posted by Willywoo View Post

     
    Originally Posted by number1pen View Post

    agame i really hope your joking, this is a good topic, i think that its a good rule that if your sitting out to start the hand, u cant sit down in the middle of the hand

    Once again, in live play your hand is folded once the last card is dealt if you are not at your seat. People should not have to act while they are guessing if you are going to return or not. It changes the game.

    This is a very good post and raises the valid issue of whether a hand should be folded if the player is not sitting in upon the completion of the deal.

    It would resolve the issue of raising blinds of those sitting out and those sitting out to gain advantage agaiinst those who might raise their blind.

    yeah, but this isnt live poker. its ONLINE poker. it is different, and this is one of the differences. sorry tmay, this is a dumb post

    Obviously this is online and live is live, but if there is a reasonable solution to a difference that is also a solution to a problem, if it really is, why not make a change?

    To just say this is "ONLINE", even if it is all caps, is rather shallow. Do you have an articulable reason for maintaining the difference or is saying this is "ONLINE" sufficient to make your point?

Similar Threads