Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
Hey guys. I've been going through some old hands that I saved, and was looking for a hand to post for another good strategy discussion. Generally I look for unusual or strange hands where there is good multi-street discussion...but i came across something a little different.
This hand is from another 50 freezout on stars. it's super early, as you can tell by chipstacks, everyone is right around 3k. I decide to just flat the button raise with aces here, sure, i could 3bet, but cause it was probably only the like 10th hand of the tourney i just decided to flat...everyone knows the advantages and disadvantages to 3betting pre, so i'd rather just ignore the flat pre for now and assume it's fine/standard. either way...bb comes along too, and the flop is pretty bad for our AA, lots of draws. usually on these boards i'll check/call once or twice, and hang around if no spade falls...but on this particular board, being that i'm out of position and that there's a 3rd player in the hand as well i decided to just check/fold
What are your thoughts about simply giving up here on the flop and not even calling one bet? I felt i was so often going to have to fold on the turn or river that it wasn't even worth calling the first bet. not to mention the fact that i dont' think this guy is necessarily going to cbet thatttt wide on a board like this into 2 players. What about if the flop was K94sss, would c/f be good then? how about K74sss? K42sss? on a less draw heavy board like the K74sss should we be check/calling once? twice? 3 times?
Basically, even though this is going to be tough to play, is it too weak to just fold the flop?
pokerstars Game #xxxxxxxx: Tournament #xxxxxxx, $50+$5 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - xxxx/xx/xx xx:xx:xx ET
Table 'xxxxxxxxx xx' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: ALXPro (2840 in chips)
Seat 2: Woopiglewie (3060 in chips)
Seat 3: lrounderl (2880 in chips)
Seat 4: pkb6786 (2980 in chips)
Seat 5: Garry26 (2960 in chips)
Seat 6: PvillePlaya (2970 in chips)
Seat 7: Gags30 (3010 in chips)
Seat 9: Look4Waldo (3400 in chips)
Gags30: posts small blind 10
Look4Waldo: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Gags30 [Ac Ad]
ALXPro: folds
Woopiglewie: folds
lrounderl: folds
pkb6786: folds
Garry26: folds
ARMOSANCJ is connected
PvillePlaya: raises 40 to 60
Gags30: calls 50
Look4Waldo: calls 40
*** FLOP *** [Ks Ts 4s]
Gags30: checks
Look4Waldo: checks
PvillePlaya: bets 100
Gags30: folds
I obviously have some thoughts about all of these questions that I posed, but I thought this was a rather odd/interesting spot that doesn't come up too often that people often times struggle with and wind up bleeding chips
also, to add some more things to discuss, how about when the board runs out all spades? with absolutely no reads on a player, is this a losing call, or does a random player bluff often enough to make blindly clicking call profitable here?
Full Tilt Poker Game #xxxxxxx: $14,000 Guarantee (Rebuy) (xxxxxxxx), Table xx - 1700/3400 Ante 400 - No Limit Hold'em - xx:xx:xx ET - xxxx/xx/xx
Seat 2: xxxxxxxx(179,299)
Seat 3: jbk2 (260,130)
Seat 5: Gags30 (158,439)
Seat 6: 3_AM_THUNDER (140,973)
xxxxxxxxx antes 400
jbk2 antes 400
Gags30 antes 400
3_AM_THUNDER antes 400
jbk2 posts the small blind of 1,700
Gags30 posts the big blind of 3,400
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Gags30 [8d 9d]
3_AM_THUNDER folds
xxxxxxxxx raises to 8,500
jbk2 folds
Gags30 has 15 seconds left to act
Gags30 has requested TIME
Gags30 calls 5,100
*** FLOP *** [5h 9s Js]
Gags30 checks
xxxxxxxxxx bets 13,999
Gags30 calls 13,999
*** TURN *** [5h 9s Js] [5s]
Gags30 checks
DeepInCidurr checks
*** RIVER *** [5h 9s Js 5s] [7s]
Gags30 checks
xxxxxxxxx has 15 seconds left to act
xxxxxxxxx has requested TIME
xxxxxxxxx bets 29,000
Gags30 has 15 seconds left to act
Gags30 calls 29,000
thoughts?
Gags30 is an instructor at PocketFives Training . To get more of his advice and to watch his training videos, click here.
-
I think you have to c/c at least the flop on the 1st hand. You really dont believe he's capable of a wide range on such a draw heavy board?? You're hand is so underrepped that you prob could min c/r here and find out for sure where you stand. Seems to me you're giving up a lot of value not pursuing the hand a little further.
On the 2nd hand, the turn check by the villian smells like a made hand. I'm not calling that river bet, ever which is probably a leak. -
You've obviously played alot more poker than me and I'm probably wrong here, but I'm definately raising to 250 to find out where Im at with AA on the flop, and folding if he reraises me. If he flats Im putting him on a flush draw and betting for value if I get checked to on the turn (assuming a spade doesnt hit). If he bets out on the turn after flatting I would try gauge by the size of the bet, whether it was a defensive bet trying to get a cheap river(in which case I flat and hope no spade falls), or if he bets out big on the turn i fold. I check down the river if he checks to me (assuming the draw misses) just to be safe. If he bets the river (assuming no spade hits) I guess I'm Calling assuming its a bluff on a missed draw.
I cant see myself folding 89 the way the hand played out. you set it up for him to bluff at, and i know i would have taken a stab at a pot that big in that situation. -
Hand #1 - I think I would check call the flop than just proceed with caution. I still think were ahead of his cbetting range. The scary turns for us could be scary for him as well. Best case scenario turn is nonspade and it goes c/c than river is nonspade and than I would prolly go for a value bet cause I wouldnt expect a king or maybe a ten to fold with all the draws he can put us on. If he bets on turn I would reevaluate and I guess go off feel, based on timing and sizing with sizing being the more important of the two. On nonspades I could see c/c or c/f tough to say without seeing how much he bets and how fast he bets it. Early in a tournament I usually tend to air on the side of caution in these spots and fold if he puts some serious pressure on us. Cause if he bets the turn hard than we have to worry about a river bet as well and than the pot is way to big for the strength of our hand. My line is prolly the same on K74 k42 etc. Overall though I wouldn't be terribly surprised if c/f the flop showed the least amount of loss in the longrun, I just know if I was in this situation I'd be to stubborn to c/f aces on the flop.
Hand #2 - Id be more inclined to check fold this flop than the previous one just cause were much shallower (id prolly fold pre sometimes 3/b), we start the hand with only 45 bbs. There are a ton of bad turns that can come. Id be interested to hear what your plan on the turn was if he had bet on that 5s. We cant c/r the flop cause only hand we can really rep is 55 or J9. Not sure what the 3/4/5 bet dynamic was but I would expect that he would expect you would try to get 99, JJ in pre and maybe AJ 4 handed. This is just a real sticky spot that I kinda like to avoid by just c/f the flop (maybe a leak). As far as the river it would probably be player dependent and my feel of that opponent, I can see call or fold. I would try to remember or look back at the hand history and the sizing of his river value bets and if he was ever caught bluffing the river. 29k on the dot a little more than half the pot kinda seems bluffy to me. Maybe im putting to much thought into that idk. -
Hand 1 I'd lead in some instances and go from there. In some instances I think c/f is best but I'd take sizing into account.
Edited By: Steve Murkle Jan 24th, 2012 at 05:04 AM
Hand 2 I think is welp. I expect most ppl to check back weaker spades and 1 pair hands otr so he's repping few value hands and a lot of those he probably barrels on the turn. So I call river here
Im falling asleep I'll try to post deeper insight tomorrow. Interesting tho -
Hand 1 : I'm definitely floating and re-evaluating based on what comes on the turn and what action there is. His c-bet here is super standard and your hand is way under-repped. I'm a pretty leaky player though so I'm interested in what everyone else has to say.
Hand 2: This all comes down to reads. With no reads at all I'm thinking this is a fold, since I don't see any hands in his range that play like he does that you're beating.
However, if you think he is a thinking/capable player, then I think your hand is pretty face up here as a 1-pair weak J or 9x type hand given the action. That being said, he expects a bet will fold out your Jx or 9x hands. With that knowledge, his value range on the river typically consists of decent strength spades or exactly 99, JJ, or 77 (or of course 55 for quads). He's probably happy to check behind a jack here, so he's repping a really small range with that bet on the end so more often than not I'm calling here in real time. I expect to lose to a random a majority of the time though, so I'm not hating a fold here. -
Hand 1 there is no way I check foldflop. You are underrepped to begin with and his cbet range should be very wide especially when 2 players check. Check call flop and potentially check call blanks ( bet sizing, timing, reads on player), on turn and river is what I would do. Though I doubt I call 3 streets onthis board, hopefully he checks turn or bets a weak amount.
Hand 2 - depends on reads. One of those spots where your feeling will have a big part in making the right decision, you can level and reason all you like but unless have an idea how this player thinks you dont know what to do.
I personally have seen A lot of players will bluff these boards when you show weakness, because it's a tough call if you don't have a high spade. I used to feel like I had to bluff these boards a lot but have slowed down because certain players will check with intention of calling, especially after turn is checked. I don't think he bets any better pairs than yours in an attempt to get you to fold a flush. I think he checks back with a pair. I also think he would value bet a flush or boat here so any reads on his typical river value sizing would help. Really for me would depend on what i had seen. What worse hands does he expect a call from on river when he bets 65% of the pot? I dont think a big bet makes sense for him given you most likely have a bluff catcher, but he might not know that ( about his bet sizing). he should bet smaller to get an obligatory call from your little pair. -
I like what you did on hand 1, and I think I understand your mindset there. It's not so much that you think you're behind is that you know you're highly unlikely to win a big pot there but could certainly lose one. Your reasoning for flatting pre is to try and extract chips from an unsuspecting late position bettor. If you now can't comfortably extract chips, what's the point of going on? If you check-call him he'll probably be suspicious that you have a big hand or big draw. If he continues betting, you'll have to assume he may have that big hand or big draw. You don't want to lose all your chips on this hand, and you're unlikely to be able to stay in long enough to win all or even many of his. So you're just cutting your losses and getting out before you get into trouble. Again it's not thinking you're necessarily behind, it's avoiding getting into a very uncomfortable situation where you're out of position and have no idea if you're up against one of the very many hands that could have you beat or end up beating you at this point
-
I'd always call at least one more on the flop (although you got me thinking maybe I shouldn't since we do indeed fold so many turns). I think hand 2 depends on the player, a good player likely won't be bluffing here with this line, whereas someone bad/unaware could definitely just be blindly barreling the 4th spade here as a pure bluff

the_dean22 is an instructor at PocketFives Training . To get more of his advice and to watch his training videos, click here.
-
Originally Posted by Adam
I like what you did on hand 1, and I think I understand your mindset there. It's not so much that you think you're behind is that you know you're highly unlikely to win a big pot there but could certainly lose one. Your reasoning for flatting pre is to try and extract chips from an unsuspecting late position bettor. If you now can't comfortably extract chips, what's the point of going on? If you check-call him he'll probably be suspicious that you have a big hand or big draw. If he continues betting, you'll have to assume he may have that big hand or big draw. You don't want to lose all your chips on this hand, and you're unlikely to be able to stay in long enough to win all or even many of his. So you're just cutting your losses and getting out before you get into trouble. Again it's not thinking you're necessarily behind, it's avoiding getting into a very uncomfortable situation where you're out of position and have no idea if you're up against one of the very many hands that could have you beat or end up beating you at this point
ya i agree with pretty much everything adam wrote here, you summarized a lot of my thoughts on the hand pretty well -
Hand 2: Tough spot to fold on the river because you'd expect him to barrel turn with most flush draws as well as baby flushes. Value betting Jx or a straight doesn't make much sense since you could have a spade. Seems like he will have a lot of air in his range trying to rep a flush (somewhat poorly) and hoping you'll fold any non spade hand.
Edited By: tyson219 Jan 25th, 2012 at 09:09 PM
What are you doing on the river facing various bet sizes? 1/2 pot? 70-75%? pot? overpot?
Thoughts on leading river? Yes, it's a pure bluff at that point, but since he has so much air in his range, is bet/folding 30-40% pot better than calling a really large polarized river bet? -
i really dont mind the c/f in hand #1 since basically half the deck is somewhat scary on turns and rivers.
Edited By: matze_widi Jan 26th, 2012 at 03:07 PM
i mean if we c/c flop what are we going to do on a K,Q,J,T,9 and all spades turns? if he barrols again?
blindly c/c again seems kinda ugly.
and he is cbetting a monotone board into 2 players in the first level, some might just not bother cbetting air here so early vs 2 ppl.
w/o any reads i think its prolly the best play to just c/f.
and yeah we are underrept but is that really worth anything in that spot?
Hand #2 is well played i would say w/o doing any math etc...
so we need to call 30k to win roughly 80k so we need to be good 35ish % if im correct.
He raises the BTN so he obv has a wide range, but there are lets say 16 combos of A4 and we would think he bets a flush on the turn. So there are 6 combos with spades ut of 15, 3 of them are low spades and prolly check back the river. So 3 cobmos of 15 have the As in them which is 20% of all the A4 combos.
If im not totally off here this has to be true for basically all non paird hands.
u would think a boat or trips will bet the turn, he could have binked with pocket 77s but that just another 3 cmobos.
Not sure if all that makes sence but i think he shows up with air here a decent % trying to get us to fold our one pair type hands -
interesting c/f on the first hand,i can dig the logic for sure. idk though, i feel like randoms aren't barreling with enough frequency to just give up here after one street. obv you're gonna give up on a lot of turns or whatever, but it's early and dolts will just cbet wide regardless of textures. if it goes ck ck on the turn, you're gonna be faced with a fairly easy decision on a lot of rivers. I think i would peel
Edited By: FenwayKing Jan 27th, 2012 at 02:35 PM
think hand 2 is def really well played and a good call; hes not gonna be vbetting many spades and a lot of those would be betting the turn -
Originally Posted by FenwayKing
interesting c/f on the first hand,i can dig the logic for sure. idk though, i feel like randoms aren't barreling with enough frequency to just give up here after one street. obv you're gonna give up on a lot of turns or whatever, but it's early and dolts will just cbet wide regardless of textures. if it goes ck ck on the turn, you're gonna be faced with a fairly easy decision on a lot of rivers. I think i would peel
the problem i have here is, A. if it doesn't go check/check on the turn, then i'm in a really bad spot, i'm out of position, still unsure of how wide he's betting, and still will have to dodge probably 14 outs at least...plus, from the flop, at least 50% of run-outs i'm going to have to give up on, and then not to mention the times that the board bricks but he keeps barreling and i have to fold.
and ya, i agree that people are bad and cbet without thinking and stuff...but i'm not so sure about a board like this, i mean, it's 3 spades and it's 2 high cards and fairly coordinated AND it's vs 2 people...i think even dolts realize that they're gonna get called by a lot of spades so they just slow down unless they have something decent (pair and a spade, draw and a spade, etc.)
Similar Threads
-
69 Replies
P5's Training Strategy Discussion: Hand From $50fo
By Gags30 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Oct 7th, 2011, 03:14 AM -
95 Replies
P5s Training Strategy Discussion - Hand from $50 Cubed
By Gags30 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Aug 20th, 2011, 10:27 PM -
2 Replies
Comic book writers/discussion boards
By bukowski101 in Off Topic
Last Post: Feb 20th, 2011, 01:18 AM - 7 Replies
-
21 Replies
WHY CANT THERE BE MULTIPLE P5's LEADER BOARDS BASED ON LIMITS?
By RAISETOWIN in Poker Discussion
Last Post: May 2nd, 2007, 12:14 AM










