Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

*PLB COMP FINAL RESULTS* 1k singles heat and 3-person heat

Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 42 3 4
  1. brainwash brainwash is offline

    San Clemente, CA
    United States

    Posts: 219
    Joined: May 05

    Nov 15th, 2009 (11/15/2009 2:30am) in reply to szusza84

    who decided that was the rule regarding chops? and how do you know what scores came in tourneys that were chopped? seems a little silly that this rule comes right after you chopped and got 2nd in taht big super turbo so it benefits your team and then hurts pikapp's big score.
     2
  2. PiKappRaider PiKappRaider is offline

    United States

    Posts: 1,208
    Joined: Jul 07

    Nov 15th, 2009 (11/15/2009 6:33am) in reply to brainwash

     
    Originally Posted by brainwash View Post

    who decided that was the rule regarding chops? and how do you know what scores came in tourneys that were chopped? seems a little silly that this rule comes right after you chopped and got 2nd in taht big super turbo so it benefits your team and then hurts pikapp's big score.

    i guess i should have thought of this when i thought i was saving a little equity by chopping lol. i obviously wish i got 1st for plb points but if thats the rule then im fine with it =/
     
  3. govshark2 govshark2 is offline

    United States

    Posts: 111
    Joined: Jul 07

    Nov 15th, 2009 (11/15/2009 11:00am) in reply to PiKappRaider

    i got first in 109 cubed on wen. and that was for 300 so plbs and it is not on the spreadsheet
  4. szusza84 szusza84 is offline Disabled account

    Posts: 27
    Joined: Dec 07

    Nov 15th, 2009 (11/15/2009 11:29am) in reply to brainwash

    well i thought it was settled in the last thread. deals were not allowed in the first place iirc, playing for less money on the line ppl play differently as apestyles said. but whatever u want, lets vote about this, but voting after two big chops is just as silly.
    1
  5. PiKappRaider PiKappRaider is offline

    United States

    Posts: 1,208
    Joined: Jul 07

    Nov 15th, 2009 (11/15/2009 12:29pm) in reply to szusza84

     
    Originally Posted by szusza84 View Post

    well i thought it was settled in the last thread. deals were not allowed in the first place iirc, playing for less money on the line ppl play differently as apestyles said. but whatever u want, lets vote about this, but voting after two big chops is just as silly.

    its not like i made a chop so my opponent would dive to me hu in an ftops, and we were still playing for 9k... but i know that voting on it now could affect scoring b/c the way chops have been done so idk... all i know is i want my extra 100 points for the ship =)
     
  6. brainwash brainwash is offline

    San Clemente, CA
    United States

    Posts: 219
    Joined: May 05

    Nov 15th, 2009 (11/15/2009 12:47pm) in reply to titantom32

    well in the other contest, you got the points for where you finished. there were some chops, but theres no way that you can track the chops or monitor them. i think the only fair way to do this is to get the points based on your finish position and go by the honor system and leave somethingto play for if youre gonna chop.
     2
  7. apestyles apestyles is offline Moderator

    Vancouver
    Canada

    Posts: 5,087
    Joined: Sep 05

    Nov 15th, 2009 (11/15/2009 12:56pm) in reply to titantom32

    I brought that up in the last competition and the rule was not switched to being the average so I don't see why we would here szusza. Pretty sure there is no rule against chopping in this comp right?
     282 12 

    apestyles is an instructor at PocketFives Training . To get more of his advice and to watch his training videos, click here.

  8. apestyles apestyles is offline Moderator

    Vancouver
    Canada

    Posts: 5,087
    Joined: Sep 05

    Nov 15th, 2009 (11/15/2009 12:59pm) in reply to PiKappRaider

    Since there is no rule I think 1st place stands but I mean.... didn't u say no chops in the last comp thread? I realize u guys were both playing ur best hu for sure though, and run better at that final table btw.
     282 12 
  9. szusza84 szusza84 is offline Disabled account

    Posts: 27
    Joined: Dec 07

    Nov 15th, 2009 (11/15/2009 1:13pm) in reply to apestyles

    ok, ill correct it after the session
    1
  10. PiKappRaider PiKappRaider is offline

    United States

    Posts: 1,208
    Joined: Jul 07

    Nov 15th, 2009 (11/15/2009 1:41pm) in reply to apestyles

     
    Originally Posted by apestyles View Post

    Since there is no rule I think 1st place stands but I mean.... didn't u say no chops in the last comp thread? I realize u guys were both playing ur best hu for sure though, and run better at that final table btw.

    i did say no chops in the other thread b/c im pretty much against them and this is the first one ive done at a big ft. just down a little and it was cool to lock up that much... and ape i'm still embarassed about the 910 hand, guess i couldnt run much better =)
     
  11. apestyles apestyles is offline Moderator

    Vancouver
    Canada

    Posts: 5,087
    Joined: Sep 05

    Nov 15th, 2009 (11/15/2009 2:40pm) in reply to PiKappRaider

    heh, i thought u played well. congrats man =)
     282 12 
  12. brainwash brainwash is offline

    San Clemente, CA
    United States

    Posts: 219
    Joined: May 05

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 1:36am) in reply to titantom32

    here's our scores from today

    brain 8th ub500. 112.15
    ape 5th stars 50^3. 111.91
    ape 9th ftp 150r. 153.82
    gov 62nd ps million 160.73
    gov 6th ps 200r 159.86
    ape 2nd ps 200r 309.03

    and this yesterday that needs to be added
    ape 1st ftp 50rt 158.43

    i think this puts us in 1st for the teams, even after bela's 3rd in 100rt, and titantoms 2nd in the warmup.
     2
  13. Belabacsi Belabacsi is offline

    Budapest
    Hungary

    Posts: 38
    Joined: Jul 07

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 2:02am) in reply to brainwash

    Yea, it looks like you managed to win it in the last minute by a little bit.:( Szusza will update it with the main scores I think.

    GG and congrats!
    101
  14. szusza84 szusza84 is offline Disabled account

    Posts: 27
    Joined: Dec 07

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 2:07am) in reply to brainwash

    yep, updated it, uve won with about 120. congrats. im too tired to check everyones scores tho, i will take a week off after 20days of soulkilling grindin. gg guys.
    1
  15. apestyles apestyles is offline Moderator

    Vancouver
    Canada

    Posts: 5,087
    Joined: Sep 05

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 3:08am) in reply to titantom32

    boom goes the dynamite

    yea, really sick sweats in this was obviously really close and tons of luck involved obviously. Thanks gg everyone! Thanks to brain and gov. I'm over poker.. until wednesday probably. Brain hurts.
     282 12 
  16. titantom32 titantom32 is offline

    Oshkosh, WI
    United States

    Posts: 464
    Joined: Dec 06

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 1:52pm) in reply to titantom32

    the last spreadsheet you posted isn't correct. There were a couple scores that didn't count because they were less than the 30r, 50fo buy in requirement and also you counted belabasci's partypoker score in your spreadsheet which clearly isn't allowed.

    Also, plb points awarded to you by p5's in order of the place you finished will stand, i'm not doing average for chops and all this bullshit when we never made it clear beforehand and now ppl are trying to find loopholes or w/e. Sorry if you chopped and then didn't win but thats the way it goes. pocketfives points will stand according to your place and no average finish points or whatever you're talking about.

    There were a few cashes from the 2500 ftops that are not in there yet either...
      
    Thread Starter
  17. Doc Sands Doc Sands is offline

    Posts: 239
    Joined: Sep 08

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 2:00pm) in reply to titantom32

    LOL@trying to award points for chop equity rather than actual finish.
    992 11
  18. bbbbb33 bbbbb33 is offline

    Posts: 2,624
    Joined: Jan 06

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 3:20pm) in reply to Doc Sands

    pretty fucking sick sunday for you guys with backs against the wall. geeg.
     1
  19. titantom32 titantom32 is offline

    Oshkosh, WI
    United States

    Posts: 464
    Joined: Dec 06

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 4:39pm) in reply to titantom32

    final results for team: team ape - 4,765.92, team belbacsi - 4,440.97, team titantom - 4,398.83
    i did the tedious math for the 3 teams in contention, if anyone has arguements let me know but i went back and checked all the scores on OPR and double checked on p5s to make sure all scores were accounted for and right now it looks pretty clear.
      
    Thread Starter
  20. IamSound IamSound is offline

    Switzerland

    Posts: 15
    Joined: Nov 08

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 5:01pm) in reply to titantom32

    i think you forgot my 50r score yesterday.. i have around 1660 points (but maybe i'm wrong)
    268 
  21. PiKappRaider PiKappRaider is offline

    United States

    Posts: 1,208
    Joined: Jul 07

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 5:02pm) in reply to titantom32

    congrats dsands and team ape for the wins

    thanks for doin this tom and sick score sunday

    hope theres more to come
     
  22. titantom32 titantom32 is offline

    Oshkosh, WI
    United States

    Posts: 464
    Joined: Dec 06

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 5:14pm) in reply to IamSound

     
    Originally Posted by IamSound View Post

    i think you forgot my 50r score yesterday.. i have around 1660 points (but maybe i'm wrong)

    Double checked and you indeed finish with 1.659.95 for 3rd. Not sure if your first 100c win counted on the 1st but it doesn't really matter either way. thanks for letting me know.
      
    Thread Starter
  23. apestyles apestyles is offline Moderator

    Vancouver
    Canada

    Posts: 5,087
    Joined: Sep 05

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 5:50pm) in reply to titantom32

     
    Originally Posted by titantom32 View Post

    Double checked and you indeed finish with 1.659.95 for 3rd. Not sure if your first 100c win counted on the 1st but it doesn't really matter either way. thanks for letting me know.

    Damn, I thought I had 3rd locked up. Thanks for doing this tom btw.
     282 12 
  24. Doc Sands Doc Sands is offline

    Posts: 239
    Joined: Sep 08

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 6:12pm) in reply to apestyles

    Most thanks goes to Tom for a organizing and tallying - neither are fun but I am sure the latter was a lot better coming off your first SIX figure score!

    Grats on the win Team Ape.

    Not sure how I ran that hot during the week...doubt I got more than 1/4 of my points on Sunday.

    Lets do this again soon. My guess is even those who didn't win the comp made money as s result of the added motivation to grind.

    GG ALL.
    992 11
  25. IamSound IamSound is offline

    Switzerland

    Posts: 15
    Joined: Nov 08

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 6:57pm) in reply to Doc Sands

    yeah, thanks tom! was quite funny and close (unlucky apestyles, i hope you dont 3bet me light the next few hands we play together ;))

    and grats doc and team ape!
    268 
  26. szusza84 szusza84 is offline Disabled account

    Posts: 27
    Joined: Dec 07

    Nov 16th, 2009 (11/16/2009 9:04pm) in reply to IamSound

    noone has ever asked or thankd us for doing this. it was clear that apes team won, there mite have been mistakes, but its bullshit blaming us for not making a tidy sheet. i was oi after we were clearly losing, doubt i care about finishing 2nd or 3rd in this. and i wasnt involved in the single comp. gg neways
    1
  27. titantom32 titantom32 is offline

    Oshkosh, WI
    United States

    Posts: 464
    Joined: Dec 06

    Nov 17th, 2009 (11/17/2009 5:21pm) in reply to szusza84

     
    Originally Posted by szusza84 View Post

    noone has ever asked or thankd us for doing this. it was clear that apes team won, there mite have been mistakes, but its bullshit blaming us for not making a tidy sheet. i was oi after we were clearly losing, doubt i care about finishing 2nd or 3rd in this. and i wasnt involved in the single comp. gg neways

    i never blamed you for anything man, just took responsiblity to make sure i knew who the winners were and wanted to make an error free spreadsheet for myself so i felt confident in sending money to people. no need for hostility. gg, it was a fun 2 weeks.
      
    Thread Starter
Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 42 3 4

Similar Threads