[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
<span><span>Is poker predominantly a game of luck or a game of skill?
</span></span>Vote at WSJ.com (click here) -
luck always prevails
-
cash game = skill
tourney/mtt = luck + skill -
If you take a small enough sample size everything is luck.
Golf, Basketball,everything....
This is why the morons who think it is luck only look at single hands.
I think the PGA tour should adopt a system where they only hit the ball once.
First to get a hole in one wins. -
its a game of bots
-
"If you take a small enough sample size everything is luck.
Golf, Basketball,everything...."
-TheJacob
This is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my entire life. So basically your saying if I got a group of 5 random guys together we could beat the 5 best players from the NBA in a game of hoops if we played them over a small sample size...say about 10-20 games. LOL, the random guys would be LUCKY to score a single basket.
Hell if PGA is such a joke, I should join the tour. Can't be that hard to win the masters if you play it a few times, am I right??
There's a reason poker is considered GAMBLING. Some random joe could play whoever you consider the best player in the world and there's no guarentee that the better player will win EVERY time. In basketball and golf, the outcome of the game isn't determined by the turn of a card. -
In a game to five with make it take it any random joe could beat Kobe.
-
What if it was a game to 21?
-
Yea, shortstack is exactly right.
I think that 2 teams at the top of their game in basketball can be determined by luck. A lucky bounce off a rebound can determine a game. However, there is a WORLD of difference between the luck in poker and the luck in a real sport.
An infant clicking all in every hand will probably beat phil ivey a decent amount of times heads up, and there is nothing phil can do to counter it. He can get his money in with the best hand, and win MORE times overall, but he will fall victim to luck a pretty significant amount of time. -
no chance in hell obv.
-
If it wasn't luck, the world chess tournament would have 8000 players.
-
Short term e.g. any given day luck>skill
Long term e.g. 6+ months luck<skill -
In the text of poker, most know a few hands or sessions are luck.
Over your life, skill -
mtt's on stars are 100% luck. never got through one without a suckout and the only one i have ft'd my 10s lost to a9. i agree with everyone else though that cash games are skill in the long term.
-
A game is a battle of decisions. Some games leave all the decisions to the player (chess) and some games leave all the decisions to chance (craps). Chess is all skill, where craps is all luck. Poker falls in the middle, however it is unique because the player can make the decision as to whether or not he wants chance to make the decision.
I like what Lederer said in the article at PPA...
So if no one shows his cards, Mr. Lederer says, "can you legally argue that the outcome was determined by luck?" -
Must be luck and im the unluckiest bastard on the planet......
Similar Threads
- 1 Replies
-
6 Replies
Proving (legally) that poker is a game of mostly skill
By Skallagrim in Poker Legislation
Last Post: Dec 7th, 2007, 12:30 PM -
14 Replies
theres no skill in poker. its a game of luck
By oscar 1 1 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Oct 4th, 2007, 01:48 PM - 3 Replies
-
29 Replies
Poker is a game of skill (warning: rant)
By Zpaceman in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Feb 5th, 2007, 07:48 PM










