-
<table id="t1" border="1" bordercolor="black"><tbody id="tablerows"><tr id="www43#pokerstars&null"><td align="center">137</td><td title="The Av. Profit is the Average Profit Per Game after rake has been subtracted." align="right">-$2 </td><td title="The Av. Stake is the average tournament buy-in amount." align="right">$7 </td><td title="The Av. ROI is the Average of each game's Return On Investment. It is the average of each (Payout-(Stake+Rake))/(Stake+Rake). This is not the same as total ROI which is (Total Payouts-(Total Rake+Total Stakes))/(Total Stakes+Total Rake)." align="center">39%</td><td title="The Total Profit is the net profit for this player (and includes rake)." align="right">-$223 </td><td title="Super Hot=6 straight payouts. Hot=3 straight payouts. Tilt=4 straight losses. Super Tilt=8 straight losses." align="center">-</td><td align="center">PokerStars</td></tr></tbody></table>
this is the stats from some guy I was playin in a 180 on stars...
is that cuz he does well at the lower buyins and lost his money in the higher ones? -
That's it!
-
im smart
-
Yes, you're thinking is right. Sharkscope shows you AVG. ROI per game played, not total ROI for all games played.
-
weeee
Similar Threads
- 3 Replies
-
2 Replies
comments(positive or negative) please ot my new blog.....please check it out.
By FullTiltGrinder in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jul 2nd, 2007, 02:41 PM -
20 Replies
POSITIVE UB thread - No negative comments please
By jesterwords in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Apr 23rd, 2007, 12:39 PM -
8 Replies
Highest ROI with negative profit
By Moosebabies in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jan 13th, 2007, 11:51 PM - 1 Replies









